What is the value of forensic science? An overview of the effectiveness of forensic science in the Australian criminal justice system project

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 217-229

  Julian, Roberta D ^a   Kelty, Sally F ^a   Roux, Claude ^b   Woodman, Peter ^c   Robertson, James ^d   Davey, Anna ^e   Hayes, Robert ^c   Margot, Pierre ^f   Ross, Alastair ^g   Sibly, Hugh ^a   White, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Victoria Police   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

^e Forensic Foundations Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^g National Institute of Forensic Science   (Australia)

Author keywords

crime scene; effectiveness; efficiency; intelligence led; investigations; police

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTELLIGENCE; POLICE; REVIEW;

EID: 84857337599     PISSN: 00450618     EISSN: 1834562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2011.610820     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. National Institute of Justice. 2004. Status and needs of forensic science service providers: a report to Congress
2. Dowling, K, Fleming, T, and, Muzzatti, S L. 2006. Constructing crime: media, crime and popular culture. Canad J Criminol Crim Justice, 48 (6): 837-850. (Pubitemid 44874920)
3. Doyle, A C. 1941. Sherlock Holmes detective stories, New York: Court Book Company.
4. Dunsmuir, W, Tran, C, and, Wetherburn, D. 2008. Assessing the impact of mandatory DNA testing of prison inmates in NSW on clearance, charge and conviction rates for selected crime categories, Sydney. NSW: Attorney General's Department. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research;.
5. Peterson, J, Sommers, I, Baskin, D, and, Johnson, D. 2010. The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process (Final Report, No. 2006-DN-BX-0094) National Institute of Justice.
6. Baskin, D, and, Sommers, I. 2010. The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of homicide incidents. J Crim Justice, 38: 1141-1149.
7. Wilson, DB, McClure, D, and, Weisburd, D. 2010. Does forensic DNA help to solve crime? The benefit of sophisticated answers to nave questions. J Contemp Crim Justice, 26 (4): 458-469.
8. Porter, G. 2011. A new theoretical framework regarding the application and reliability of photographic evidence. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 15: 26-61.
9. Weisburd, D, and, Neyroud, P. 2011. Police science: towards a new paradigm. New perspectives in policing, Harvard Kennedy School: National Institute of Justice. US.
10. National Audit Office. 2003. Report on improving service delivery: the forensic science service, London: The Stationery Office.
11. National Institute of Forensic Science. 2001. The advancement of science for justice Melbourne, Australia
12. California Task Force. 2003. Report on Forensic Services California: Office of the Attorney General
13. James, S, and, Norby, J. 2003. Forensic science: an introduction to scientific and investigative techniques, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
14. Lambert, E, Hogan, N, Nerbonne, T, Barton, S B, Watson, P L, Buss, J, and, Lambert, J. 2007. Differences in forensic science views and needs of law enforcement: a survey of Michigan law enforcement agencies. Police Pract Res, 8 (5): 415-430.
15. Werrett, D J, and, Sparkes, R. Proceedings of Ninth International Symposium on Human Identification. Madison, WI: Promega Corporation.
16. Smith, A. Programme delivery and the impact on combating crime and practical implementation issues. Beyond DNA in the UK: Integration and Harmonisation, Forensic Science Conference Proceedings 2004. May 17-19. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London.
17. Bradbury, S, and, Feist, A. 2005. The use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: a review of the research literature, Home Office Online Report 43/05. UK.
18. Briody, M, and, Prenzler, T.D.N.A. 2005. Databases and property crime: a false promise?. Aust J Forensic Sci, 37 (2): 73-86. (Pubitemid 43906951)
19. Williams, R, and, Johnson, P. 2008. Genetic policing: the use of DNA in criminal investigations, Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
20. Innes, M, and, Clarke, A. 2009. Policing the past: cold case studies, forensic evidence and retroactive social control. Brit J Sociol, 60 (3): 543-563.
21. Julian, R, Mason, R, Hickey, G, and, Tomkins, K. 2004. Forensic science and policing in South Australia, Hobart, Tasmania: Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement Studies. University of Tasmania.
22. Julian, R, Mason, R, and, Hickey, G. 2005. Forensic science and policing in Victoria. Final Report, Hobart, Tasmania: Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement Studies. University of Tasmania.
23. Peterson, J L. 1975. Forensic science: scientific investigation in criminal justice, New York: AMS Press.
24. National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. National Academies Press.
25. Home, Office. Review of research and development in forensic science terms of reference. Accessed 28 February 2011 from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/ publications/police/forensic-science-regulator1/tor-forensic-science-review, 2011
26. Sparrow, M K. 2011. Governing Science. New Perspectives in Policing Paper Series for the Harvard Executive Session on Police and Public Safety. Boston, MA: Harvard University, National Institute of Justice.
27. Strom, KJ, and, Hickman, MJ. 2010. Unanalyzed evidence in law-enforcement agencies: A national examination of forensic processing in police departments. Criminology and Public Policy, 9 (2): 381-404.
28. Cole, SA. 2010. Forensic identification evidence: Utility without infallibility. Criminology and Public Policy, 9 (2): 375-379.
29. Beaver, K. 2010. The promises and pitfalls of forensic evidence in unsolved crimes. Criminology and Public Policy, 9 (2): 405-410.
30. Roman, J K, Reid, S, Reid, J, Cahlfin, A, Adams, W, and, Knight, C. 2008. The DNA field experiment: cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of DNA in the investigation of high-volume crimes, Washington: Urban Institute. Justice Policy Centre.
31. Speaker, P J. 2009. The decomposition of return on investment for forensic laboratories. Forensic Sci Policy Mgmt, 1: 96-102.
32. Speaker, P J. 2009. Key performance indicators and managerial analysis for forensic laboratories. Forensic Sci Policy Mgmt, 1: 32-42.
33. Houck, M M, Riley, R A, Speaker, P J, and, Witt, T S. 2009. FORESIGHT: a business approach to improving forensic science services. Forensic Sci Policy Mgmt, 1 (2): 85-95.
34. Briody, M. 2004. The effects of DNA evidence on homicide cases in court. Australian New Zealand J. Criminol, 37: 231-253.
35. Schroeder, D A. 2007. DNA and homicide clearance: what's really going on?, City University of New York.
36. ANZPAA NIFS News. 2011. Forensic projects: end to end processes 3 Melbourne, Australia
37. Robertson, J. 2009. Forensic Science: An enabler or dis-enabler for criminal investigation?. In Criminal Investigations Workshop, Canberra: Australian Capital Territory, ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security (CEPS).
38. Kelty, S F, and, Julian, R. 2010. Identifying the skills and attributes of good crime scene personnel. Australasian Policing, 2 (2): 40-41.
39. Julian, R, and, Woodman, P. The effectiveness of forensic science in the criminal justice system. 19th International Symposium on the Forensic Sciences. Melbourne.
40. Kind, S S. 1987. The scientific investigation of crime, Harrogate, Yorkshire, UK: Forensic Science Services Ltd.
41. Barclay, D. 2009. Edited by: J., Fraser and R. Williams (editor). 337-358. Handbook of Forensic Science: Publishing.
42. Ribaux, O, Baylon, A, Roux, C, Delémont, O, Lock, E, Zingg, C, and, Margot, P. 2010. Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence. Forensic Sci Int, 195 (1-3): 10-16.
43. Ribaux, O, Baylon, A, Lock, E, Delémont, O, Roux, C, Zingg, C, and, Margot, P. 2010. Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination. Forensic Sci Int, 199 (1-3): 63-71.
44. Ribaux, O, Walsh, S J, and, Margot, P. 2006. The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic Intelligence. Forensic Sci Int, 156: 171-181. (Pubitemid 43061262)
45. Baylon, A. 2009. Approche basée sur le renseignement pour optimiser les prises de décision liées au processus dintervention sur scène de crime. Revue internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique, 62 (2): 105-106.
46. Anon. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Certain Aspects of the Trial and Conviction of James Driskell Winnipeg MB., Canada. Accessed 15 December, 2010 from http://www.reidreporting.com/driskell.html, 2006
47. Robertson, J, and, Roux, C. 2010. Trace evidence; here today, gone tomorrow?. Science and Justice, 50: 18-22.
48. Day, S P. Forensic science service. Parliamentary Business. Publications & records London. Accessed 23 March 2011 from http://www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmsctech/writev/forensic/m31.htm, 2011
49. Silverman, B. Research and development in forensic science; a review. June 2011. Crown Copyright. ISBN 978-1-84987-480-9
50. Roach, J, and, Pease, K. 2006. DNA evidence and police investigations: a health warning. Police Professional,: 52