The role of the therapist: The 'forgotten' factor in ROM;De rol van de behandelaar: De 'vergeten' factor in ROM

Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 197-201

  De Jong, Kim ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Feedback; Routine outcome monitoring; Therapist effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;

EID: 84857296890     PISSN: 03037339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Aoun S, Pennebaker D, Janea A. Outcome measurement in rural mental health care: a field trial of rooming-in models. Aust J Rural Health 2002; 10: 302-7.
2. Jong K de, Nugter A. De kunst van het effectief feedback geven: waarom weten niet altijd tot verbeteren leidt. In: Buwalda VJA, Nugter MA, Swinkels JA, Mulder CL, red. Praktijkboek ROM in de ggz; een leidraad voor gebruik en implementatie van meetinstrumenten. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom; 2011.
3. Herold DM, Parsons CK, Rensvold RV. Individual differences in the generation and processing of performance feedback. Educ Psychol Meas 1996; 56: 5-25.
4. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, meta-analyis and preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 254-84. (Pubitemid 126042646)
5. Riemer M, Bickman L. Using program theory to link social psychology and program evaluation. In Mark MM, Donaldson SI, Campbell B, red. Social psychology and evaluation. New York: Guilford; 2011.
6. Walter G, Cleary M, Rey JM. Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome. J Qual Clin Pratt 1998; 18: 109-15. (Pubitemid 28261264)