Recreation use values and nonuse values of Glen and Grand Canyons

US Geological Survey Circular

Volumn , Issue 1282, 2005, Pages 153-164

  Loomis, John ^a   Douglas, Aaron J ^b   Harpman, David A ^c  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^c U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857295086     PISSN: 1067084X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Learner, E., Radner, R., and Schuman, H., 1993, Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation: Federal Register, v. 58, no. 10, p. 4602-4614.
2. Behan, J., 2000, Recreation in the Colorado River ecosystem and the Adaptive Management Program: Flagstaff, Ariz., Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center.
3. Bishop, R.C., Boyle, K.J., Welsh, M.P, Baumgartner, R.M., and Rathbun, PR., 1987, Glen Canyon Dam releases and downstream recreation: an analysis of user preferences and economic values. Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Report No. 27/87: Washington, D.C., Bureau of Reclamation (available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, as NTIS report no. PB88-182546/AS).
4. Boyle, K., Welsh, M., and Bishop, R., 1993, The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-value studies: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 25, p. S80-S99.
5. Carson, R., Flores, N, Martin, K., and Wright, J., 1996, Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing estimates for quasi-public goods: Land Economics, v. 72, p. 151-163.
6. Champ, P., Bishop, R., Brown, T, and McCollum, D., 1997, Using donation mechanisms to value non-use benefits from public goods: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 33, no. 2, p. 151-162. (Pubitemid 27266564)
7. Douglas, A., 2005, Colorado River environmental and recreational values below Glen Canyon Dam: Fort Collins, Colo., U.S. Geological Survey.
8. Douglas, A.J., and Harpman, D.A., 1995, Estimating recreation employment effects with IMPLAN for the Glen Canyon Dam region: Journal of Environmental Management, v. 44, p. 233-247. (Pubitemid 26430313)
9. Ethier, R., Poe, G, Schulze, W, and Clark, J., 2000, A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for a green-pricing electricity program: Land Economics, v. 76, no. 1, p. 54-67. (Pubitemid 30397979)
10. Grand Canyon National Park, 2004, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Colorado River Management Plan, v. 1.
11. Hall, T., and Shelby, B., 2000, 1998 Colorado River boater study: Grand Canyon, Ariz., Grand Canyon National Park.
12. Hammer, M., 2001, Applying the TCM with secondary data to white water boating in Grand Canyon National Park: Fort Collins, Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, M.S. thesis.
13. Harpman, D., Welsh, M., and Bishop, R., 1993, Nonuse economic value: emerging policy analysis tool: Rivers, v. 4, no. 4, p. 280-291.
14. Hjerpe, E., and Yeon-Su Kim, 2003, Economic impacts of summer steady flows on recreation: Flagstaff, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry.
15. Krutilla, J., 1967, Conservation reconsidered: American Economic Review.
16. Loomis, J., 2002, Integrated public lands management: principles and applications to national forests, parks, wildlife refuges and BLM lands (2d ed.): New York, Columbia University Press.
17. Loomis, J., and Walsh, R., 1997, Recreation economic decisions: comparing benefits and costs (2d ed.): State College, Pa., Venture Publishing.
18. Minnesota Implan Group, 1997, IMPLAN Professional: social accounting and impact analysis software: Stillwater, Minn.
19. National Research Council, 1999, Downstream: adaptive management of Glen Canyon Dam and the Colorado River ecosystem: Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
20. National Research Council, 2005, Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision-making: Washington, D.C., National Academies Press.
21. Richards, M., Wood, B., and Caylor, D., 1985, Sport-fishing at Lees Ferry, Arizona: user differences and economic values: Flagstaff, Ariz., report to Northern Arizona University Organized Research Committee.
22. Roberts, C, and Bieri, J., 2001, Impacts of low flow rates on recreation rafting traffic on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park: Study performed for Bureau of Reclamation and Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center.
23. Roberts, C, Stallman, D., and Bieri, J., 2002, Modeling complex human-environment interactions: the Grand Canyon River Trip Simulator: Ecological Modelling, v. 153, p. 181-196. (Pubitemid 34689049)
24. Stewart, W, Larkin, K., Orland, B., Anderson, D., Manning, R., Cole, D., Taylor, J., and Tomar, N, 2000, Preferences of recreation user groups of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon: Flagstaff, Ariz., Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center.
25. U.S. Department of the Interior, 1986, Natural resource damage assessment regulations. 51. Federal Register 27674. Codified at 43 C.F.R. 11.10-11.93 (1987).
26. U.S. District Court of Appeals, 1989, State of Ohio vs. U.S. Department of the Interior. Case no. 86-1575. District of Columbia, July 14.
27. U.S. Water Resources Council, 1983, Economic and environmental principles for water and related land resource implementation studies: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. Welsh, M.P, Bishop, R.C., Phillips, M.L., and Baumgartner, R.M., 1995, Glen Canyon Dam, Colorado River Storage Project, Arizona-non-use value study final report: Madison, Wis., Hagler Bailly Consulting, Inc., September 8, 1995, 400 p.: Springfield, Va.: National Technical Information Service, NTIS no. PB98-105406.