Sustainable river basin management: A dynamic model

Proceedings of the Conference on River Basin Management - Progress Towards Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 151-161

  Da Silva, P Antão ^a   Rocha, J S ^a   Antunes, M P ^b   Santos, R F ^b   Borrego, D ^c  

^a NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c Institute of Marine Research   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS; DRIVING FORCES; ECONOMICAL ASPECTS; EUROPEAN WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE; MANAGEMENT PLANS; PORTUGAL; QUALITATIVE DATA; RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT; RIVER BASINS; WATER DEMAND; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

DYNAMIC MODELS; ECOLOGY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHEDS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84857294609     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Alcamo, J., 2001. Scenarios as Tools for International Environmental Assessments. EEA - European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
2. Chapra, S.C. & Canale, R.P. 1985. Numerical Methods for Engineers. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
3. EC (European Commission), 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, OJ L 327, 22.12.2000.
4. Giupponi, C. 2004. From the DPSIR reporting framework to a system for a dynamic and integrated decision making process. MULINO Conference on European policy and tools for sustainable water management, 21-23 November, Venice, Italy.
5. GIWA. 2002. GIWA Methodology. Detailed Assessment, Causal Chain Analysis, Policy Option Analysis. Version 3.5 Draft, GIWA - Global International Waters Assessment, Kalmar, Sweden.
6. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J. & Kajanus, M. 2000. Utilysing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis - a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy Economics (1), 499-506.
7. Pahl-Wostl, C. 2004. The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management. Keynote Paper for iEMSs 2004, 14-17 June 2004, University of Osnabrück, Germany.
8. Passell, H.D., Tidwell, V.C., Conrad, S.H. & Thomas, R.P. 2003. Cooperative Water Resources Modeling in the Middle Rio Grande Basin. SAND Report, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
9. Rahaman, M.M. & Varis, O. 2005. Integrated water resources management: evolution, prospects and future challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 1(1), 1-8.
10. Reitsma, R.F. & Carron, J.C. 1997. Object-oriented Simulation and Evaluation of River Basin Operations. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 1(1), 9-24.
11. Simonovic, P.S. 2000. Tools for Water Management. One View of the Future. Water International, 25(1), 76-88.
12. Teodosiu, C., Barjoveanu, G. & Teleman, D. 2003. Sustainable water resources management. 1. River basin management and the ec water framework directive. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 2(4), 377-394.
13. van den Belt, M. 2004. Mediated Modeling. A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building. Washington: Island Press.