Investigation of damages to stand caused by selection cutting using skidding system in the Asalem-Nav forest, Iran

Journal of Environmental Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 59, 2011, Pages 89-98

  Tavankar, F ^a   Bonyad, A E ^b   Majnounian, B ^c  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUILAN   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Logging damage; Selection method; Skidding; Stand regeneration; Winching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857293561     PISSN: 10258620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Camp, A. 2002. Damage to residual trees by four mechanized harvest systems operating in smalldiameter, mixed conifer forests on steep slopes in northeastern Washington: A case study. West. J. App. Forestry. 17(1):14-22. (Pubitemid 34148467)
2. Clatterbuck, K. W. 2006. Logging damage to residual trees following commercial harvesting to different overstory retention levels in a mature hardwood stand in Tennessee. P591-594, Proceedings of the 13th biennial southern silvicultural research conference, U. S. A.
3. Ficklin, R. L., et al. 1997. Residual tree damage during selection cuts using two skidding system in the Missouri Ozaraks. P36-46, Proceedings of 11th Central Hardwoods Forest Conference. Columbia.
4. Han, H. S. and L. D., Kellogg. 2000 (a). Damage characteristics in young Doglas-fir stand from commercial thinning with four Timber harvesting systems. West. J. App. Forestry. 15(1):1-7.
5. Han, H. S., L. D., Kellogg. 2000 (b). A comparison of sampling method and a proposed quick survey for measuring residual stand damage from commercial thinning. J. For. Eng. 11:63-69.
6. Hartsough, B. 2003. Economics of harvesting to maintain high structural diversity and resulting damage to residual trees. West. J. App. Forestry. 18(2):133-142.
7. Iskandar, H., et al. 2006. A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. J. For. Ecol. and Manag. 237:83-93. (Pubitemid 44828332)
8. Limbeck-Lilenau, B. 2003. Residual stand damage caused by mechanized harvesting systems. IIP. CD Rom. Steinmuller and Stampfer. Proceedings of High tech forest operations for mountainous terrain. Sclaegl-Austria.
9. Meadows J. S. 1993. Logging damage to residual trees following partial cutting in a green Ash-Sugarberry stand in the Mississippi Delta. P248-260, 9th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, U. S. A.
10. Meng, W. 1978. Residual tree damage during forest harvesting and effects on stand. LFV Baden Wurttemberg press. 159p.
11. Solgi, A., A., Najafi. 2007. Investigation of residual tree damage during ground-based skidding. Pakistan J. Biol. Sciences. 10(10):1755-1758. (Pubitemid 46607985)
12. Pinard, M. A., et al. 1995. Creating timber harvesting guidelines for a reduced impact logging project in Malaysia. J. Forestry. 39(10):41-45. (Pubitemid 26433295)
13. Putz, F. E., D. P., Dykstra, R., Heinrich. 2000. Why poor logging practices persist in the tropics. J. Conservation Biology. 14(4):951-956. (Pubitemid 30610441)
14. Seablom, T. J., D. D., Reed. 2005. Assessment of factors contributing to residual tree damage from mechanized harvesting in northern hardwoods. North. J. App. Forestry. 22:124-131. (Pubitemid 40860297)
15. Sist, P., et al. 1998. Harvesting intensity versus sustainability in Indonesia. J. For. Eco. & Man. 108:251-260. (Pubitemid 28338796)
16. Sist, P. 2000. Reduced impact logging in the tropics: objectives, principles and impacts. International Forestry Review. 2:3-10. (Pubitemid 30234077)
17. Solgi, A., A., Najafi. 2007. Investigation of residual tree damage during ground-based skidding. Pakistan J. Biol. Sciences. 10(10):1755-1758. (Pubitemid 46607985)
18. Yilmaz, M., A., Akay. 2008. Stand damage of a selection cutting system in an uneven aged mixed forest of Cimendagi in Kahramanmarz-Turkey. International J. Nat. and Eng. Sciences. 2(1):77-82.