Water Quality and Biotic Community of a Highland Stream under the Influence of a Eutrophic Fishpond

International Review of Hydrobiology

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 26-40

  Kopp, Radovan ^a,b   Vítek, Tomáš ^a   Štastný, Jan ^a   Sukop, Ivo ^a   Brabec, Tomáš ^a   Ziková, Andrea ^a   Spurný, Petr ^a   Mareš, Jan ^a  

^a MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Chemical analyses; Fish; Macrozoobenthos; Phytobenthos; Pond

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CYANOBACTERIUM; DISCHARGE; EUTROPHIC ENVIRONMENT; FISH; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; MACROINVERTEBRATE; PHOSPHORUS; PHYTOBENTHOS; PHYTOPLANKTON; SPECIES RICHNESS; STREAM; UPLAND REGION; WATER QUALITY; ZOOBENTHOS;

ALGAE; CYANOBACTERIA; WORONICHINIA NAEGELIANA;

EID: 84857292790     PISSN: 14342944     EISSN: 15222632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.201111426     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adámek, Z. and P. Jurajda, 2001: Stream habitat or water quality - what influences stronger fish and macrozoobenthos biodiversity? - Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 1: 305-311.
2. Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright and M. T. Furse, 1983: Performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites. - Water Res. 17(3): 333-347.
3. Atazadeh, I., M. Sharifi and M. G. Kelly, 2007: Evaluation of the Trophic Diatom Index for assessing water quality in River Gharasou, western Iran. - Hydrobiologia 589: 165-173.
4. Birk, S. and D. Hering, 2006: Direct comparison of assessment methods using benthic macroinvertebrates: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive intercalibration exercise. - Hydrobiologia 566: 401-415.
5. Boyd, C. E. 2003: Guidelines for aquaculture effluent management at the farm-level. - Aquaculture 226: 101-112.
6. Brabec, K., S. Zahrádková, D. Němejcová, P. Pařil, J. Kokeš and J. Jarkovský, 2004: Assessment of organic pollution effect considering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats. - Hydrobiologia 516: 331-346.
7. Cen 2004: Water Quality - Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatom Samples from Running Waters. - EN 14407: 2004. Cimité European de Normalisation, Geneva.
8. Cen 2010: Water Quality - Guidance Standard for the surveying, sampling and laboratory analysis of phytobenthos in shallow running water. - EN 15708: 2009. Cimité European de Normalisation, Geneva.
9. Centis, B., M. Tolotti and N. Salmaso, 2010: Structure of the diatom community of the River Adige (North-Eastern Italy) along a hydrological gradient. - Hydrobiologia 639: 37-42.
10. Dam, V. H., A. Mertens and J. Sinkeldam, 1994: A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. - Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 28: 117-133.
11. Dodds, W. K., J. R. Jones and E. B. Welch, 1998: Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus. - Water Res. 32: 1455-1462.
12. Dratnal, E. and K. Kasprzak, 1980: The response of the invertebrate fauna to organic pollution in a well oxygenated karst stream exemplified by the Pradnik Stream (South Poland). - Acta Hydrob. 22: 263-278.
13. European Commission, 2000: Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. - Off. J. Eur. Communities, L 327/1, 22. 12. 2000.
14. EN ISO 748, 2007: Hydrometry. Measurement of liquid flow in open channels using current-meters or floats. - BSI, 58 pp.
15. Fott, B., 1954: Pleurax, a synthetic resin for diatom preparation. - Preslia 26: 193-194 (in Czech).
16. Griffith, M. B., H. B. Hill, H. F. McCormick, R. P. Kaufmann, T. A. Herlihy and R. A. Selle, 2005: Comparative application of indices of biotic integrity based on periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and fish to southern Rocky Mountain streams. - Ecol. Indic. 5: 117-136.
17. Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin and P. F. M. Vendonschot, 2004: Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. - Hydrobiologia 516: 1-20.
18. Hollingsworth, K. E. and L. M. Vis, 2010: The spatial heterogenity of diatoms in eight southeastern Ohio streams: how far does a single riffle reach? - Hydrobiologia 651: 173-184.
19. Hürlimann, J. and F. Schanz, 1993: The effects of artificial ammonium enhancement on riverine periphytic diatom communities. - Aquat. Sci. 55: 40-64.
20. Jiang, X. M., J. J. Xiong, J. W. Qiu, J. M. Wu, J. W. Wang and Z. C. Xie 2010: Structure of Macroinvertebrate Communities in Relation to Environmental Variables in a Subtropical Asian River System. - Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol. 95(1): 42-57.
21. Jurajda, P., Z. Adámek, M. Janáč and Z. Valová, 2007: Fish and macrozoobenthos in the Vlára stream drainage area (Bílé Karpaty Mountains). - Czech J. Anim. Sci. 52: 214-225.
22. Jurajda, P., Z. Adámek, M. Janáč and Z. Valová, 2010: Longitudinal patterns in fish and macrozoobenthos assemblages reflect degradation of water quality and physical habitat in the Bílina river basin. - Czech J. Anim. Sci. 55: 123-136.
23. Kawecka, B., 1980: Sessile algae in European mountain streams. 1. The ecological characteristics of communities. - Acta Hydrobiol. 22: 361-420.
24. Kelly, M. G., A. Cazaubon, E. Coring, A. Dell'Uomo, L. Ector, B. Goldsmith, H. Guasch, J. Hürlimann, A. Jarlman, B. Kawecka, J. Kwandrans, R. Laugaste, E. A. Lindstrøm, M. Leitao, P. Marvan, J. Padisák, E. Pipp, J. Prygiel, E. Rott, S. Sabater, H. van Dam and J. Vizinet, 1998: Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. - J. Appl. Phycol. 10: 215-224.
25. Kelly, M. G., 2000: Identification of common benthic diatoms in rivers. - Field Study 9: 583-700.
26. Kelly, M. G. and Whitton, B. A., 1995: The Tropic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. - J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 433-444.
27. Lawa 1998: Beurteilung der Wasserbeschaffenheit von Fließgewässern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland - Chemische Gewässergüteklassifikation. - Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser. 1. Edition, Kulturbuchverlag Berlin, 69 pp. (in German).
28. Lorenzen, C. J., 1967: Determination of chlorophyll and phaeopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 343-346.
29. Lukavský, J., J. Bauer, K. Kaštovská, F. Lederer and P. Šmilauer, 2004: Phytobenthos of streams in the Bohemian/Bavarian Forest, under different human impacts. - Silva Gabreta 10: 45-78.
30. Lukavský, J., A. Moravcová, L. Nedbalová and O. Rauch, 2006: Phytobenthos and water quality of mountain streams in the Bohemian Forest under the influence of recreational activity. - Biologia 61(20): 533-542.
31. MacNeil, C., J. A. Dick and R. W. Elwood, 1997: The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda): problems and perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. - Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 72: 349-364.
32. Masseret, E., C. H. Amblard and G. Boudier, 1998: Changes in the structure and metabolic activities of periphytic communities in a stream receiving treated sewage from a waste stabilization pond. - Wat. Res. 32(8): 2299-2314.
33. Petts, G. E. and P. Calow (eds.) 1996: River restoration: Selected extracts from the rivers handbook. - Blackwell Science, London, 231 pp.
34. Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross and R. M. Hughes, 1989: Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers. Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. - EPA/440/4-89/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
35. Řezníčková, P., P. Pařil, and S. Zahrádková, 2007: The ecological effect of drought on the macroinvertebrate fauna of a small intermittent stream - an example from the Czech Republic. - Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol. 92: 514-526.
36. Rosenberg, D. M. and V. H. Resh (eds.). 1993: Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. - Chapman and Hall, New York. pp. 1-9.
37. Rott, E., G. Hofmann, K. Pall. P. Pfister and E. Pipp, 1997: Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil. I. Saprobielle Indikation. - Bundesministerium f. Land. u. Forstwirtschaft, Österreich, 73 pp. (in German).
38. Rott, E. (eds.), 1999: Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen. Teil 2: Trophieindikation und autökologische Anmerkungen. - Bundesministerium f. Land - u. Forstwirtschaft, Österreich, 248 pp. (in German).
39. Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver, 1949: The mathematical theory of communication. - The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
40. Ter Braak, C. J. F. and P. Smilauer, 2002: CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). - Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA, 500 pp.
41. Welch, E. B., J. M. Quinn and C. W. Hickey, 1992: Periphyton biomass related to point-source nutrient enrichment in seven New Zealand streams. - Wat. Res. 26(5): 669-675.
42. Žalud, Z. (eds.), 2008: Biological and technological aspects of sustainability of controlled ecosystems and their adaptability to climate change - indicators of ecosystem services. - Folia Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis I, 4, 176 pp.
43. Zelinka, M. and P. Marvan, 1961: Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 57: 389-407 (in German).
44. Živič, I., Z. Markovič, Z. Filipovič-Rojka and M. Živič, 2009: Influence of a trout farm on water quality and macrozoobenthos communities of the receiving stream (Trešnjica River, Serbia). - Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol. 94(6): 673-687.