Routine outcome monitoring and benchmarking: How can treatment results be compared in a responsible manner?;Routine outcome monitoring en benchmarking: Hoe kunnen we behandelresultaten op een zorgvuldige manier vergelijken?

Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 141-145

  Noom, Marc J ^a   De Jong, K ^b   Tiemens, B ^c,d,e   Kamsteeg, F ^f   Markus, M T ^g   Pot, A M ^h   Schippers, G M ⁱ   Swildens, W ^j   Sytema, S ^k   Theunissen, J ^l   Van Der Vlist, H P ^m   Vuyk, J ⁿ   Zondervan, T ^o  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Centre for Education and Science   (Netherlands)

^d Stichting Centrum Voor Zorgmonitoring   (Netherlands)

^e Onderzoek Indigo Service Organisatie   (Netherlands)

^f Kenniscentrum GGNet ^*  (Netherlands)

^g Acad Ctr Child and Adol Psychiat   (Netherlands)

^h NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION   (Netherlands)

ⁱ AMSTERDAM INSTITUTE FOR ADDICTION RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^j Altrecht   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^l VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^m EQ Groep   (Netherlands)

ⁿ Altrecht   (Netherlands)

^o Delta Psychiatrisch Centrum   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Comparison; Mental health care; Routine outcome monitoring

Indexed keywords

MENTAL HEALTH CENTER; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SHORT SURVEY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BENCHMARKING; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 84857272074     PISSN: 03037339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Beurs E de. De genormaliseerde T-score. Een euro voor testuitslagen. Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid 2010; 65: 684-95.
2. Camp RC. Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee: Quality press for the American society for quality control: 1989.
3. France FHR, Mertens I, Closon M, Hofdijk J. Case mix - Global view, local actions: Evolution in twenty countries. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001.
4. Jacobson N, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 12-9.
5. Parabiaghi A, Barbate AD, Avanzo B, Erlichter A, Lora A. Assessing reliable and clinically significant change on health of the nation outcome scales: Method for displaying longitudinal data. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 719-25. (Pubitemid 43904374)
6. Tiemens B, Noorthoorn E, Janssen W, Kloos M. ROM GGZ, een pilot: ervaringen, mogelijkheden en aandachtspunten. Amersfoort: GGZ Nederland; 2010.
7. Zaslavsky AM. Statistical issues in reporting quality data: Small samples and casemix variation. Int J Qual Health Care 2001; 13: 481-8. (Pubitemid 33133923)
8. Zichtbare Zorg ggz. Basisset prestatie-indicatoren 2009-2010 geestelijke gezondheidszorg en verslavingszorg. Den Haag: Zichtbare zorg ggz; 2009.