Cultivar discrimination at different site elevations with remotely sensed vegetation indices

Italian Journal of Agronomy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-5

  Basso, Bruno ^a,b,c   Cammarano, Davide ^c   Cafiero, Giovanni ^a   Marino, Stefano ^d   Alvino, Arturo ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Elevation; Potato cultivar; Proximal sensing; Vegetation indices

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; CANOPY; CULTIVAR; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ELEVATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROWING SEASON; LEAF AREA; POTATO; RADIOMETER; REFLECTANCE; REMOTE SENSING; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS; VEGETATION INDEX;

ITALY;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84857245507     PISSN: 11254718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/ija.2011.e1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aparicio N., Villegas D., Araus J.L., Casadeus J., Royo C., 2002. Relationship between growth traits and spectral vegetation indices in Durum Wheat. Crop Sci. 42:1547-1555.
2. Aparicio N., Villegas D., Casadesus J., Araus J.L., Royo C., 2000. Spectral Vegetation Indices as Nondestructive Tools for Determining Durum Wheat Yield. Agron. J. 92:83-91.
3. Asrar G., Fuchs M., Kanemasu E.T., Hatfield J.L., 1984. Estimating absorbed photosynthetic radiation and LAI from spectral reflectance in durum wheat. Agron. J. 76:300-306.
4. Baret F., Guyot G., 1991. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Rem. Sens. Environ. 35:161-173.
5. Barnes E.M, Clarke T.R., Richards S.E., 2000. Coincident detection of crop water stress, nitrogen status and canopy density using ground based multispectral data. In: P.C. Robert, R.H. Rust, W.E. Larson (eds), Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on precision agriculture, Madison, WI, USA.
6. Basso B., Cammarano D., Chen D., Cafiero G., Amato M., Bitella G., Rossi R., Basso F., 2009. Landscape position and precipitation effects on spatial variability of wheat yield and grain protein in Southern Italy. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195:301-312.
7. Blackmer T.M., Schepers J.S., 1995. Use of a chlorophyll meter to monitor nitrogen status and schedule fertigation for corn. J. Prod. Agric. 8:56-60.
8. Broge N.H., Leblanc, E., 2000. Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density. Remote Sens. Environ. 76:156-172.
9. Daughtry C.S.T., Walthall C.L., 1998. Spectral discrimination of Cannabis sativa L. leaves and canopies. Remote Sens. Environ. 64:192-201.
10. Daughtry C.S.T., Walthall C.L., Kim M.S., de Colstoun E.B., McMurtrey III J. E., 2000. Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration from Leaf and Canopy Reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 74 229-239.
11. Demetriades-Shah, T.H., Steven M.D., Clark J.C., 1990. High resolution derivative spectra in remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 33:55-64.
12. Galvao L.S., Formaggio A.R., Tisot D.A., 2005. Discrimination of sugarcane varieties in Southeastern Brazil with EO-1 Hyperion data. Remote Sens. Environ. 94:523-534.
13. Galvao L.S., Roberts D.A., Formaggio A.R., Numata I., Breuning F.M., 2009. View angle effects on the discrimination of soybean varieties and on the relationships between vegetation indices and yield using off-nadir Hyperion data. Remote Sens. Environ. 113:846-856.
14. Haboudane D., Miller J.R., Tremblay N., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Dextraze L., 2002. Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophill content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 81:416-426.
15. Huete A.R., 1988. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens. Environ. 25:295-309.
16. Huete A.R., Jackson R.D., Post D.F., 1985. Soil background effects on canopy reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 17:37-53.
17. Inoue Y., 2003. Synergy of remote sensing and modeling for estimating ecophysiological processes in plant production. Plant Prod. Sci. 6:3-16.
18. Lawes Agricultural Trust, 2007. GenStat 10th edition, ver. 10.1. Lawes Agricultural Trust. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
19. Li, H., Lascano, R.J., Barnes, E.M., Booker, J., Wilson, L.T., Bronson, K.F., Segarra, E., 2001. Multispectral reflectance of cotton related of plant growth, soil water and texture, and site elevation. Agron. J. 93:1327-1337.
20. Pfeiffer T.W., 1996. Choosing soybean varieties from yield trials: multiple maturity groups and yield variability. J. Prod. Agric. 9:371-376.
21. Qi J., Chehbouni A., Huete A.R., Kerr Y.H., Sorooshian S., 1994. A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens. Environ. 48:119-126.
22. Rondeaux G., Steven M., Baret F., 1996. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens. Environ. 55:95-107.
23. Thenkabail, P.S., 2002. Optimal hyperspectral narrow bands for discriminating agricultural crops. Remote Sens. Environ. 20:257-291.
24. Wiegand C.L., Gerbermann A.H., Gallo K.P., Blad B.L., Dusek D., 1990. Multisite analyses of spectral-biophysical data for corn. Remote Sens. Environ. 33:1-16.
25. Zhu Y., Tian Y., Yao X., Liu X., Cao W., 2007. Analysis of common canopy reflectance spectra for indicating leaf nitrogen concentrations in wheat and rice. Plant Prod. Sci. 10:400-411.