Gabor deconvolution: Estimating reflectivity by nonstationary deconvolution of seismic data

Geophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Margrave, Gary F ^a   Lamoureux, Michael P ^a   Henley, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; FACTORIZATION; GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING; NUMERICAL METHODS; REFLECTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC WAVES; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

APPROXIMATE FACTORIZATION; ATTENUATION FUNCTION; ATTENUATION PROCESS; DISCRETE GABOR TRANSFORM; MULTIPLICATIVE FACTORS; NONSTATIONARY SIGNALS; NUMERICAL APPROACHES; WINDOWED FOURIER TRANSFORMS;

WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

DECONVOLUTION; FOURIER TRANSFORM; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC REFLECTION; SMOOTHING;

EID: 84857240230     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3560167     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards, 2002, uantitative seismology, second edition: University Science Books.
2. Bickel, S. H., and R. R. Natarajan, 1985, Plane-wave deconvolution: Geophysics, 50, 1426-1439 10.1190/1.1442011
3. Claerbout, J., 1976, Fundamentals of geophysical data processing: McGraw-Hill.
4. Clarke, G. K. C., 1968, Time-varying deconvolution filters: Geophysics, 33, 936-944 10.1190/1.1439987
5. Futterman, W. I., 1962, Dispersive body waves: Journal of Geophysical Research, 73, 3917-3935.
6. Griffiths, L. J., F. R. Smolka, and L. D. Trembly, 1977, Adaptive deconvolution: A new techniue for processing time-varying seismic data: Geophysics, 42, 742-759 10.1190/1.1440743
7. Hargreaves, N. D., and A. J. Calvert, 1991, Inverse filtering by Fourier transform: Geophysics, 56, 519-527 10.1190/1.1443067
8. Kjartansson, E., 1979, Constant -wave propagation and attenuation: Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, B9, 4737-4748 10.1029/JB084iB09p04737
9. Koehler, F., and M. T. Taner, 1985, The use of the conjugate-gradient algorithm in the computation of predictive deconvolution operators: Geophysics, 50, 2752-2758 10.1190/1.1441895
10. Landa, L., I. Belfer, and S. Keydar, 1999, Multiple attenuation in the parabolic ;- p domain using wavefront characteristics of multiple generating primaries: Geophysics, 64, 1806-1815 10.1190/1.1444686
11. Ma, Y., and G. F. Margrave, 2008, Seismic depth imaging with the Gabor transform: Geophysics, 73, no. 3, S91-S97 10.1190/1.2903821
12. Margrave, G. F., 1998, Theory of nonstationary linear filtering in the Fourier domain with application to time-variant filtering: Geophysics, 63, 244-259 10.1190/1.1444318
13. Margrave, G. F., P. C. Gibson, J. P. Grossman, D. C. Henley, V. Iliescu, and M. P. Lamoureux, 2004, The Gabor transform, pseudodifferential operators, and seismic deconvolution: Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 9, 1-13.
14. Margrave, G. F., and M. P. Lamoureux, 2001, Gabor deconvolution: CREWES Research Report, 13, 241-276, accessed 31 January 2011; http://www.crewes.org/ForOurSponsors/ResearchReports.
15. Margrave, G. F., M. P. Lamoureux, J. P. Grossman, and V. Iliescu, 2002, Gabor deconvolution of seismic data for source waveform and correction: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2190-2193.
16. Montana, C. A., and G. F. Margrave, 2005, Phase correction in Gabor deconvolution: 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2173-2176.
17. Montana, C. A., and G. F. Margrave, 2006, Surface-consistent Gabor deconvolution: 76th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2812-2816.
18. O'Doherty, R. F., and N. A. Anstey, 1971, Reflections on amplitudes: Geophysical Prospecting, 19, no. 3, 430-458 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00610.x
19. Peacock, K. L., and S. Treitel, 1969, Predictive deconvolution: Theory and practice: Geophysics, 34, 155-169 10.1190/1.1440003
20. Perz, M., L. Mewhort, G. F. Margrave, and L. Ross, 2005, Gabor deconvolution: Real and synthetic data experiences: 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 494-497.
21. Robinson, E. A., 1954, Predictive decomposition of time series with applications to seismic exploration: Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
22. Robinson, E. A., 1967, Predictive decomposition of time series with application to seismic exploration: Geophysics, 32, 418-484 10.1190/1.1439873
23. Robinson, E. A., and S. Treitel, 1967, Principles of digital Wiener filtering: Geophysical Prospecting, 15, no. 3, 311-332 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1967.tb01793.x
24. Sheriff, R. E., and L. P. Geldart, 1995, Exploration seismology: Cambridge University Press.
25. Stein, E. M., 1993, Harmonic analysis: Princeton University Press.
26. Treitel, S., P. Gutowski, and D. Wagner, 1982, Plane-wave decomposition of seismograms: Geophysics, 47, 1375-1401 10.1190/1.1441287
27. Wang, Y., 2002, A stable and efficient approach of inverse filtering: Geophysics, 67, no. 2, 657-663 10.1190/1.1468627
28. Wang, Y., 2006, Inverse -filter for seismic resolution enhancement: Geophysics, 71, no. 3, V51-V60 10.1190/1.2192912
29. Wards, B. D., G. F. Margrave, and M. P. Lamoureux, 2008, Phase-shift time-stepping for reverse-time migration: 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2262-2266.
30. Yilmaz, O., 2008, Seismic data analysis: SEG.
31. Zhang, C., and T. J. Ulrych, 2007, Seismic absorption compensation: A least-suares inverse scheme: Geophysics, 72, no. 6, R109-R114 10.1190/1.2766467