A comparison of the dispersion relations for anisotropic elastodynamic finite-difference grids

Geophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Bernth, Henrik ^a   Chapman, Chris ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER CAMBRIDGE RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; DIGITAL ARITHMETIC; ELASTIC WAVES; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; QUANTUM THEORY; WAVE EQUATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; DISPERSION RELATIONSHIP; FINITE DIFFERENCE CALCULATIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE GRIDS; FLOATING POINT OPERATIONS; NUMERICAL DISPERSION RELATION; PROPAGATION DIRECTION; STAGGERED GRID SCHEMES;

DISPERSION (WAVES);

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ELASTIC WAVE; ELASTODYNAMICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WAVE DISPERSION; WAVE EQUATION; WAVE PROPAGATION; WAVE VELOCITY;

EID: 84857240134     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3555530     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Anné, L., Q. H. Tran, and W. W. Symes, 1997, Dispersion and cost analysis of some finite difference schemes in one-parameter acoustic wave modeling: Computational Geosciences, 1, no. 1, 1-33. 10.1023/A:1011576309523
2. Davydycheva, S., V. Druskin, and T. Habashy, 2003, An efficient finite-difference scheme for electromagnetic logging in 3D anisotropic inhomogeneous media: Geophysics, 68, 1525-1536. 10.1190/1.1620626
3. Fornberg, B., 1990, High-order finite differences and the pseudospectral method on staggered grids: SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 27, no. 4, 904-918. 10.1137/0727052
4. Holberg, O., 1987, Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentiation in large-scale simulation of wave phenomena: Geophysical Prospecting, 35, no. 6, 629-655 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00841.x.
5. Igel, J., P., Mora, and B., Riollet, 1995, Anisotropic wave propagation through finite difference grids: Geophysics, 60, 1203-1216. 10.1190/1.1443849
6. Lebedev, V. I., 1964, Difference analogues of orthogonal decompositions, basic differential operators and some boundary problems of mathematical physics I: USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 4, no. 3, 69-92.
7. Lisitsa, V., and D., Vishnevskiy, 2010, Lebedev scheme for the numerical simulation of wave propagation in 3d anisotropic elasticity: Geophysical Prospecting, 58, no. 4, 619-635 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00862.x
8. Lisitsa, V. V., 2007, Lebedev schemes for elastic anisotropic problems: Presented at the 69th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
9. Moczo, P., J. O. A. Robertsson, and L. Eisner, 2007, The finite-difference time-domain method for modelling of seismic wave propagation, in R. S. Wu, V. Maupin, and R. Dmowska, eds., Advances in wave propagation in heterogeneous earth: Elsevier Academic Press, volume 48, Advances in Geophysics.
10. Saenger, E., and T. Bohlen, 2004, Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid: Geophysics, 69, 583-591 10.1190/1.1707078
11. Saenger, E. H., N. Gold, and S. A. Shapiro, 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid: Wave Motion, 31, no. 1, 77-92 10.1016/S0165-2125(99)00023-2
12. Virieux, J., 1986, P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite difference method: Geophysics, 51, 889-901 10.1190/1.1442147