Gender and communication in interpersonal contexts

The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-8

  Wood, Julia T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857224051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976053     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bate, B. (1988). Communication between the sexes. New York: Harper & Row.
2. Butler, J. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay inphenomenology and feminist thought. Theatre Journal 40 (1988). 519-531. doi:10.2307/3207893 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3207893
3. Butler, J. (1990/1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
4. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex." New York: Routledge.
5. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
6. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
7. Campbell, K.K. The rhetoric of women’s liberation: An oxymoron. Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973). 74-86. doi:10.1080/00335637309383155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383155
8. Collins, P.H. Learning from the outsider within. Social Problems 23 (1986). 514-532.
9. Diamond, E. (1996). Introduction. In E. Diamond (Ed.), Performance and cultural politics (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
10. Eakins, B., & Eakins, G. (1978). Sex differences in human communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and theprivilege of partial perspective. Signs 14 (1988). 575-599.
12. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13. Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 283-310). Boston: Ridel.
14. Johnson, F. Political and pedagogical implications of attitudes towards women’s language. Quarterly Journal of Speech 31 (1983). 133-138.
15. Kramer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today 8 (1974). 82-85.
16. Lakoff, R. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 2 (1973). 45-80. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
17. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
18. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Pearson, J. (1985). Gender and communication. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
20. Rose, H. Hand, brain and heart: Towards a feminist epistemology for thesciences. Signs 9 (1983). 73-98. doi:10.1086/494025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494025
21. Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
22. Spender, D. (1980). Man-made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
23. Stewart, L.P., Stewart, A.D., Friedley, S.A., & Cooper, P.J. (1987). Communication between the sexes: Sex differences, and sex role stereotypes. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
24. Thomson, D. "Is race a trope?" Anna Deavere Smith and the question of racial performativity. African American Review 37 (2003). 127-138. doi:10.2307/1512365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1512365
25. Wood, J.T. (Ed.). Women and communication. Communication Quarterly 31 (1983). 99-184. doi:10.1080/01463378309369492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378309369492
26. Wood, J.T. Report on the 1986 conference on gender and communication research. Women’s Studies in Communication 10 (1986). 90-93.
27. Wood, J.T., Phillips, G.M. Report on the 1984 conference on gender and communication research. Communication Quarterly 32 (1984). 175-177. doi:10.1080/01463378409369549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378409369549
28. Wood, J.T., Phillips, G.M. Report on the 1985 conference on gender and communication research. Women’s Studies in Communication 8 (1985). 94-97.