Capitalization and proximity to agricultural and natural lands: Evidence from Delaware

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 99, Issue , 2012, Pages 110-117

  Borchers, Allison M ^a   Duke, Joshua M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural land; Farmland; Hedonic Pricing Model; Land preservation; Open space

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CAPITALISM; DATA ACQUISITION; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; LAND MANAGEMENT; OPEN SPACE; POPULATION GROWTH; PRICE DYNAMICS; PROPERTY MARKET; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; URBAN AREA;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ARTICLE; CAPITALIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HOUSEHOLD; LAND USE; NATURAL LAND; POPULATION GROWTH; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES;

DELAWARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84857215508     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson S.T., West S.E. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2006, 36:773-789.
2. Anselin L. Spatial econometrics. Econometric Theory 2006, vol. 1:901-969. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. T.C. Mills, K. Patterson (Eds.).
3. Bell K.P., Bockstael N.E. Applying the generalized method of moments approach to spatial problems involving micro level data. Review of Economic and Statistics 2000, 82(1):72-82.
4. Bohlen C., Lewis L.Y. Examining the economic impacts of hydropower dams on property values using GIS. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(S3):S258-S269.
5. Bolitzer O.B., Netusil N.R. The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Management 2000, 59:185-193.
6. Cho S., Clark C.D., Park W.M., Kim S.G. Spatial and temporal variation in the housing market values of lot size and open space. Land Economics 2009, 85(1):51-73.
7. Cropper M.L., Deck L.B., McConnell K.E. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Review of Economics and Statistics 1988, 70(4):668-675.
8. Delaware Agricultural Lands Preservation Foundation Current situation report for June 15, 2010 (accessed 11.10.10). http://dda.delaware.gov/aglands/forms/2009/051209_CSR.pdf.
9. Delaware DataMIL Delaware Land Use Land Cover 2007, State of Delaware, Office of Management and Budget, Delaware Geographic Data Committee, (accessed 05.04.09). http://datamil.delaware.gov/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home/.
10. Delaware Department of Transportation Road network DelDOT centerline file (accessed 05.04.09). http://www.deldot.gov/information/pubs_forms/gis/centerline/index.shtml.
11. Downes T.A., Zabel J.E. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics 2002, 52(1):1-25.
12. Duke J.M., Aull-Hyde R. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics 2002, 42(1-2):131-145.
13. Duke J.M., Ilvento T.W. A conjoint analysis of public preferences for agricultural land preservation. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2004, 33(2):209-219.
14. Figlio D.N., Lucas M.E. What's in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. The American Economic Review 2004, 94(3):591-604.
15. Geoghagen J. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 2002, 19:91-98.
16. Geoghegan J., Lynch L., Bucholtz S. Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2003, 32(2):33-45.
17. Geoghegan J., Wainger L., Bockstael N.E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 1997, 23(3):251-264.
18. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):465-480.
19. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N.E. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space in residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(3):689-704.
20. Johnston R.J., Duke J.M. Willingness to pay for agricultural land preservation and policy process attributes: does the method matter?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2007, 89(4):1098-1115.
21. Johnston R.J., Opaluch J.J., Grigalunas T.A., Mazzotta M.J. Estimating amenity benefits of coastal farmland. Growth and Change 2001, 32(3):305-325.
22. Kane T.J., Riegg S.K., Staiger D.O. School quality, neighborhoods, and housing prices. American Law and Economics Review 2006, 8(2):183-212.
23. Kuminoff N.V. Using a bundled amenity model to estimate the value of cropland open space and determine an optimal buffer zone. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2009, 43(1):68-90.
24. Kuminoff N.V., Parmeter C.F., Pope J.C. Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2010, 60(3):145-160.
25. Lewis L.Y., Acharya G. Environmental quality and housing markets: does lot size matter?. Marine Resource Economics 2006, 21:317-330.
26. McConnell V., Walls M. The Value of Open Space: Evidence from Studies of Nonmarket Benefits 2005, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
27. Neumann B.C., Boyle K.J., Bell K. Property price effects of a national wildlife refuge: Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in Massachusetts. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:1101-1119.
28. Palmquist R.B. Property value models. Valuing Environmental Changes 2005, vol. 2:763-818. Elsevier, North-Holland. K.G. Maler, J.R. Vincent (Eds.).
29. Palmquist R.B., Danielson L.E. A hedonic study of the effects of erosion control and drainage on farmland values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1989, 71(1):55-62.
30. Palmquist R., Roka F.M., Vukina T. Hog operations, environmental effects, and residential property values. Land Economics 1997, 73(1):114-124.
31. Ready R.C., Abdalla C.W. The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: estimating from a hedonic pricing model. American Journal of Agriculture Economics 2005, 87(2):314-326.
32. Ready R.C., Berger M.C., Blomquist G.C. Measuring amenity benefits from farmland: a comparison of hedonic pricing and contingent valuation techniques. Growth and Change 1997, 28:438-458.
33. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service, the census of agriculture 1997, 2002, 2007 (accessed 10.11.09). http://www.agcensus.usda.gov.
34. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census American FactFinder (accessed 01.06.09). http://factfinder.census.gov.