Mining OMIM™ for insight into complex diseases

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 753-757

  Cantor, Michael N ^a   Lussier, Yves A ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

cluster analysis; Databases; genetic; genotype; phenotype

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GENE EXPRESSION; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DISEASES;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GENETIC; GENETIC INFORMATION; GENOTYPE; HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING ANALYSIS; METHODS OF ANALYSIS; MICROARRAY TECHNOLOGIES; PHENOTYPE; COMPLEX DISEASE; GENETIC LOCUS; GENETIC RESEARCH; MOLECULAR LEVELS; SIMPLE++; SOURCE MATERIAL;

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857180669     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-753     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Phillips TJ, Belknap JK. Complex-trait genetics: emergence of multivariate strategies. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002;3:478-485.
2. Kanehisa M, Bork P. Bioinformatics in the post-sequence era. Nature Genetics 2003;33:S305-S310.
3. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000;406:747-52.
4. Baldini A. DiGeorge syndrome: the use of model organisms to dissect complex genetics. Human Molecular Genetics 2002;ll(20):2363-69.
5. Burke W. Genomics as a probe for disease biology. New EnglJMed 2003;349(10):969-974.
6. Lussier YA, Sarkar IN, Cantor MN. An integrative model for in-silico clinical-genomics discovery science. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:469-73
7. Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger J, Valle D, McKusick V. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Human Mutation 2000;15:67-61.
8. Wang J, J D, Aasheim HC, Smeland E, Myklebost O. Clustering of the SOM easily reveals distinct gene expression patterns: results of a reanalysis of lymphoma study. BMC Bioinformatics 2002;3(36).
9. Tamayo P, Slonim D, Mesirov J, et al. Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: Methods and applications to hematopoetic differentiation. PNAS 1999;96:2907-12.
10. Alcantara VM, Chautard-Freire-Maia EA, Scartezini M, al. e. Butyrylcholinesterase activity and risk factors for coronary artery disease. Scan J Clin Lab Invest 2002;62:399-404.
11. Hashim Y, Shepherd D, Wiltshire S, et al. Butyrylcholinesterase K variant on chromosome 3 q is associated with Type II diabetes in white Caucasian subjects. Diabetologia 2001;44(12):2227-30.
12. OMIM entry 102770. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim. Updated 6/27/02.
13. Loh E, Rebbeck TR, Mahoney PD, et al. Common variant in AMPD1 gene predicts improved clinical outcome in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1999;99(11): 1422-5.
14. Zelko IN, Mariani TJ, Folz RJ. Superoxide dismutase mul-tigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radic Biol Med 2002;33(3):337-49.
15. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. PNAS 1998;95(25): 14863-14868.
16. Ramoni MF, Sebastiani P, Kohane IS. Cluster analysis and gene expression dynamics. PA45 2002;99(14):9121-9126.
17. Ressom H, Wang D, Natarajan P. Adaptive double self-organizing maps for clustering gene expression profiles. Neural Networks 2003;16:633-640.
18. Cantor MN, Lussier YA. Putting data integration into practice: Using biomedical terminologies to add structure to existing data sources. Proc AMIA Symp 2003:; 125-9.