Toward a personal learning environment framework

International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 66-85

  Chatti, Mohamed Amine ^a,c   Agustiawan, Mohammad Ridwan ^a   Jarke, Matthias ^a,d   Specht, Marcus ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

^d FIT Institute of Applied IT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Informal Learning; Lifelong Learning; Network Learning; Personal Learning Environment; Personalization; Personalized Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857166514     PISSN: 19478518     EISSN: 19478526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jvple.2010100105     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion.
2. Anderson, T. (2006). PLEs versus LMS: Are PLEs ready for prime time? Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://terrya.edublogs.org/2006/01/09/ples- versuslmsare-ples-ready-for-prime-time/
3. Aspin, D. N., & Chapman, J. D. (2000). Lifelong learning: Concepts and conceptions. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 2-19. doi:10.1080/026013700293421
4. Attwell, G. (2007a). The personal learning environments - the future of elearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1). Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf
5. Attwell, G. (2007b). Personal learning environments for creating, consuming, remixing and sharing. In Proceedings of the 2nd TENCompetence Open Workshop (pp. 36-41). Bolton, UK: Institute of Educational Cybernetics.
6. Baumgartner, P., Hfele, H., & Maier-Hfele, K. (2004). Content Management Systems in e-Education. Auswahl, Potenziale und Einsatzmglichkeiten. Innsbruck-Wien, Germany: StudienVerlag.
7. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale . In Jordan, P. W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. A., & McClelland, A. L. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.
8. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32.
9. Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2003). Next-generation course management systems. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 26(1), 10-13.
10. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of elearning: A shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4/5), 404-420. doi:10.1504/IJKL.2007.016702
11. Cross, J. (2006). Informal learning: rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance. Pfeiffer.
12. CUELC. (2008). Cairo University eLearning Center. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://elearning.eng.cu.edu.eg
13. Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn, 10(1). Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1
14. Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/paper92.html
15. Eckstein, R., Loy, M., & Wood, D. (1998). Java Swing. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
16. Jafari, A., McGee, P., & Carmean, C. (2006). Managing courses, defining learning: What faculty, students, and administrators want. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(4), 50-71.
17. Jennex, M., Olfman, L., Panthawi, P., & Park, Y. (1998). An organizational memory Information Systems success model: An extension of DeLone and McLean's I/S success model. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 157).
18. Klamma, R., Chatti, M. A., Duval, E., Hummel, H., Hvannberg, E. H., & Kravcik, M. (2007). Social software for life-long learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 72-83.
19. L2P. (2008). Lehr- und Lernportal (L2P). Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.cil.rwthaachen.de/L2P.htm
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lubensky, R. (2006). The present and future of Personal Learning Environments (PLE). Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://members.optusnet.com. au/rlubensky/2006/12/presentand-future-of-personallearning.html
22. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledgecreating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University.
23. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. International Journal of Digital Economics, 65, 17-37.
24. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
25. SCORM. (2009). The Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM), Advanced Distributed Learning. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.adlnet.org/Technologies/scorm/default.aspx
26. Siemens, G. (2004). Learning management systems: The wrong place to start learning. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/ lms.htm
27. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/KnowingKnowledge/index.php/Main-Page
28. SUMI. (2008). SUMI-The de facto industry standard evaluation questionnaire for assessing quality of use of software by end users. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://sumi.ucc.ie/
29. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York: Doubleday.
30. Tobin, D. R. (2000). All learning is self-directed: How organizations can support and encourage independent learning. ASTD Press.
31. Van Assche, F., Duval, E., Massart, D., Olmedilla, D., Simon, B., & Sobernig, S. (2006). Spinning interoperable applications for teaching & learning using the simple query interface. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 51-67. (Pubitemid 43723731)
32. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2007). Personal learning environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2), 27-38.