Time for a Change of Scene

Environmental Forensics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 312-318

  Hadley, Paul W ^a   Crapps, Earl ^b   Hewitt, Alan D ^c  

^a California Department of Toxic Substances Control   (United States)

^b Alaska Department Environmental Conservation   (United States)

^c Engineer Research and Development Center   (United States)

Author keywords

incremental sampling; soil contamination

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857143107     PISSN: 15275922     EISSN: 15275930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15275922.2011.622344     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barth, D. S. and Mason, B. J. 1984, May. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User's Guide, Las Vegas: NV: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA600/4-84-043
2. Doctor, P. G. and Gilbert, R. O. 1978. "Two studies in variability for soil concentrations with aliquot size and distance". In Selected Environmental Plutonium Research Reports of the Nevada Applied Ecology Group (NAEG), Edited by: White, M. and Dunaway, P. 405-449. Las Vegas, NV: U. S. Department of Energy.
3. Hadley, P. W. and Sedman, R. M. 1990. A health-based approach for sampling shallow soils and hazardous waste sites using the AAL (soil contact) criterion. Environmental Health Perspectives, 84: 203-207.
4. Hewitt, A. D., Ramsey, C. and Bigl, S. 2008. Multi-increment TCE vadose zone investigation. Remediation Journal, 19(1): 125-140.
5. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC). 2008. Use of risk assessment in management of contaminated sites. RISK-2, Washington, DC: ITRC Council, Risk Assessment Resources Team.
6. Jenkins, T. F., Grant, C. L.Brar, G. S. 1996, September. An Assessment of Sampling Error Associated with Collection and Analysis of Soil Samples at Explosives-Contaminated Sites, Hanover, NH: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Special Report 96-15. Available at:http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/techpub/CRREL_Reports/reports/SR96_15.pdf
7. Jenkins, T. F., Hewitt, A. D.Walsh, T M. E. 2005. Representative sampling for energetic compounds at military training ranges. Environmental Forensics, 6: 45-55.
8. Ramsey, C. A. and Hewitt, A. D. 2005. A methodology for assessing sample representativeness. Environmental Forensics, 6: 71-75.
9. Reynolds, S. D, Hadley, P. W. and Sedman, R. M. 1990. A health-based approach for evaluating soil at depth contaminated by hazardous waste: Utilizing the AAL (soil contact) criterion. Risk Analysis, 10(4): 571-574.
10. Schumacher, B. A. and Minnich, M. M. 2000. Extreme short-range variability in VOC-contaminated soils. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(17): 3611-3616.
11. Schweitzer, G. E. and Santolucito, J. A. 1984. Environmental Sampling for Hazardous Wastes, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
12. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE). 2009. Interim Guidance 09-02: Implementation of Incremental Sampling (IS) of Soil for the Military Munitions Response Program Available at http://www.hnd.usace.army.mil/oew/policy/IntGuidRegs/IGD%209-02v2.pdf
13. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume 1:Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A)-Interim Final Washington, DC Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1-89/002
14. Walsh, M. E., Collins, C. M., Bailey, R. N. and Grant, C. L. 1997, December. Composite sampling of sediments contaminated with white phosphorous, Hanover, NH: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Special Report 97-30. Prepared for: U. S. Army Environmental Center, SFIM-AEC-ET-CR-97043