Transpiration response of de-rooted peanut plants to aquaporin inhibitors

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 78, Issue , 2012, Pages 167-172

  Devi, M Jyostna ^a   Sadok, Walid ^b   Sinclair, Thomas R ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Aquaporin; Inhibitors; Leaf hydraulic conductance; Peanut; Transpiration rate; Vapor pressure deficit

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; INHIBITOR; LEGUME; NITRATE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PROTEIN; SOIL WATER; SOYBEAN; TRANSPIRATION; VAPOR PRESSURE;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; GLYCINE MAX; TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS;

EID: 84857127692     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. 2 and ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:1291-1300.
2. Brockwell J. Plant infection counts of Rhizobia in soils. Nitrogen Fixation of Legumes 1982, 211-221. Academic Press, New York, NY. J.M. Vincent (Ed.).
3. Brodribb T.J., Holbrook N.M. Declining hydraulic efficiency as transpiring leaves desiccate: two types of response. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:2205-2215.
4. Brodribb T.J., Holbrook N.M., Gutierrez M.V. Hydraulic and photosynthetic co-ordination in seasonally dry tropical forest trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25:1435-1444.
5. Cochard H., Venisse J.-S., Bargiah T.S., Brunel N., Herbette S.P., Guilliot A.S., Tyree M.T., Sakr S. Putative role of aquaporins in variable hydraulic conductance of leaves in response to light. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:122-133.
6. Devi M.J., Sinclair T.R., Vadez V. Genotypic variation in peanut for transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:191-196.
7. 2 enrichment) and N-fertilization. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:1500-1512.
8. Fletcher A.L., Sinclair T.R., Allen L.H. Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered 'slow-wilting' and commercial soybean. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61:145-151.
9. Franks P.J. Higher rates of leaf gas exchange are associated with higher leaf hydrodynamic pressure gradients. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:584-592.
10. Gay A.P., Nichols R. The effects of some chemical treatments on leaf water conductance of cut, flowering stems of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Sci. Hort. 1977, 6:167-177.
11. Heinen R.B., Ye Q., Chamont F.O. Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2971-2985.
12. Henzler T., Ye Q., Seudle E. Oxidative gating of water channels (aquaporins) in Chara by hydroxyl radicals. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27:1184-1195.
13. Ketring D.L. Temperature effects on vegetative and reproductive development of peanut. Crop Sci. 1984, 24:877-882.
14. Ligaba A., Katsuhara M., Shibasaka M., Djira G. Abiotic stresses modulate expression of major intrinsic proteins in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Compt. Rend. Biol. 2011, 334:127-139.
15. Luu D.-T., Maurel C. Aquaporins in a challenging environment: molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:85-96.
16. Maggio A., De Pascale S. Hydraulic conductivity of cut flower stems and aquaporins function. Acta Hort. 2007, 755:225-230.
17. Nardini A., Salleo S. Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation?. Trees - Struct. Funct. 2000, 15:14-24.
18. Nardini A., Salleo S. Effects of the experimental blockage of the major veins on hydraulics and gas exchange of Prunus laurocerasus L. leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54:1213-1219.
19. Nardini A., Salleo S., Andri S. Circadian regulation of leaf hydraulic conductance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv Margot). Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:750-759.
20. Niemietz C.M., Tyerman S.D. New potent inhibitors of aquaporins: silver and gold compounds inhibit aquaporins of plant and human origin. FEBS Lett. 2002, 531:443-447.
21. Obrig T.G., Culp W.J., Mckeehan W.L., Hardesty B. The mechanism by which cycloheximide and related glutarimide antibiotics inhibit peptide synthesis on reticulocyte ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246:174-181.
22. Preston G.M., Jung J.S., Guggino W.B., Agre P. The mercury-sensitive residue at cysteine 189 in the CHIP28 water channel. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:17-20.
23. Sack L., Cowan P.D., Jaikumar N., Holbrook N.M. The 'hydrology' of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:1343-1356.
24. Sadok W., Sinclair T.R. Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:955-960.
25. Sadok W., Sinclair T.R. Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) genotypes selected from a recombinant inbred line population. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113:156-160.
26. 3. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:1423-1430.
27. Sadok W., Sinclair T.R. Transpiration response of 'slow-wilting' and commercial soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) genotypes to three aquaporin inhibitors. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:821-829.
28. Sinclair T.R., Zwieniecki M.A., Holbrook N.M. Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132:446-451.
29. Talwar H.S., Takeda H., Yashima S., Senboku T. Growth and photosynthetic responses of groundnut genotypes to high temperature. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:460-466.
30. Tamás L., Dudíková J., Ďurčeková K., HaluŠková L., Huttová J., Mistrík I., Ollé M. Alterations of the gene expression, lipid peroxidation, proline and thiol content along the barley root exposed to cadmium. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165:1193-1203.
31. Tyree M.T., Sinclair B., Lu P., Granier A. Whole shoot hydraulic resistance in Quercus species measured with a new high-pressure flowmeter. Ann. For. Sci. 1993, 50:417-423.
32. Van Doorn W.G., Harkema H., Song J.S. Water relations and senescence of cut Iris flowers: effects of cycloheximide. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1995, 5:345-351.
33. Voicu M.C., Zwiazek J.J. Inhibitor studies of leaf lamina hydraulic conductance in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) leaves. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30:193-204.
34. Voicu M.C., Zwiazek J.J., Tyree M.T. Light response of hydraulic conductance in bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) leaves. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28:1007-1015.
35. Voicu M.C., Cooke J.E., Zwiazek J.J. Aquaporin gene expression and apoplastic water flow in bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) leaves in relation to the light response of leaf hydraulic conductance. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:4063-4075.
36. Williams J.H., Boote K.J. Physiology and modeling-predicting the unpredictable legume. Advances in Peanut Science 1995, 301-353. Am. Peanut Res. Ed. Soc., Stillwater, OK. H.E. Pattee, H.T. Stalker (Eds.).
37. Yang S., Tyree M.T. Hydraulic architecture of Acer saccharum and A. rubrum: comparison of branches to whole trees and the contribution of leaves to hydraulic resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45:179-186.
38. 2 with candidate aquaporin-1 inhibitors DMSO, gold, TEA+ and acetazolamide. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580:6679-6684.
39. Yukutake Y., Tsuji S., Hirano Y., Adachi T., Takahashi T., Fujihara K., Agre P., Yasui M., Suematsu M. Mercury chloride decreases the water permeability of aquaporin-4-reconstituted proteoliposomes. Biol. Cell 2008, 100:355-363.