Participation as a new mode of governance? Scientists and policymakers linked in a double spiral

Sustainable Forestry: From Monitoring and Modelling to Knowledge Management and Policy Science

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 35-55

  Kouplevatskaya, Irina ^a  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Forest policy; Kyrgyzstan.; Modes of governance; National forest programmes; Participatory process; Power redistribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857115515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Antypas A. and Meidinger, R. (1996) Science-intensive Policy Disputes: an Analytic Overview of the Literature. www.law.buffalo.edu/homepage/eemeid/scholarship/scipol.html
2. Barstad, J. (2002) Iterative Planning Processes: Supporting and Impeding Factors. http://www. metla.fi/eu/cost/e19/barstad.pdf
3. Bormann, B.T., Cunningham, P.G., Brookes, M.H., Manning, V.W. and Collopy, M.W. (1993) Adaptive Ecosystem Management in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Forestry Service Gen. Tech. Report PNW-GTR-341, 22 pp.
4. Buttoud, G. (1999a) Principles of participatory processes in public decision making. In: Niskanen, A. and Vayrinen, J. (eds) Regional Forest Programmes - a Participatory Approach to Support Forest Based Regional Development. Proceedings 32, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 11-28.
5. Buttoud, G. (1999b) Negotiation methods to support participatory forestry planning. In: Niskanen, A. and Vayrinen, J. (eds) Regional Forest Programmes - a Participatory Approach to Support Forest Based Regional Development. Proceedings 32, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 29-47.
6. Buttoud, G. (2000) Linking theory with lessons learnt in forest policy planning: voiced thoughts on the role of science in N/RFP evaluation and formulation. In: National Forest Programmes: Social and Political Context. COST E19 meeting, SECF and Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid, pp. 9-14.
7. Buttoud, G. and Samyn, J.-M. (1999) Politique et Planification Forestière: Guide pour la Formulation et L'évaluation. Intercooperation, Berne, Switzerland.
8. Buttoud, G. and Yunusova, I. (2002) A 'mixed model' for the formulation of a multipurpose mountain forest policy: theory vs. practice on the example of Kyrgyzstan. Forest Policy and Economics 4, 149-160.
9. Buttoud, G. and Yunusova, I. (2003) The mixed model for decision making as a conceptual framework for IMP formulation. In: Brun, F. and Buttoud, G. (eds) The Formulation of Integrated Management Plans (IMPs) for Mountain Forests. Proceedings of the International Research Course, Bardonecchia, Italy, 30 June-5 July 2002, Dipartimento di Economia e Ingeneria Agraria, Forestale e Embientale, University of Torino, Italy, pp. 19-31.
10. Davis, H. and Scase, R. (1985) Western Capitalism and State Socialism. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
11. Etzioni, A. (1967) Mixed scanning: a third approach to decision-making. Public Administation Review 27, 385-392.
12. Faludi, A. (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory. Pergamon Press, New York.
13. Gunton, T. (1984) The role of the professional planner. Canadian Public Administration, Fall 35-49.
14. Hudson, B. (1979) Comparison of current planning theories: counterparts and contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association, October, 387-398.
15. Hunt, S. (1990) Truth in marketing theory and research. Journal of Marketing 54 (July), 1-15.
16. Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova, I. (2004) Spirals of forest policy development, or transformation of participation in an iterative process: the case of Kyrgyzstan. In: Buttoud, G., Solberg, Tikkanen and Pajan (eds) The Evaluation of Forest Policies and Programmes. Proceedings 52, EFI, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 103-114.
17. Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova, I. (2005) The evolution of stakeholders' participation in a process of forest policy reform in Kyrgyz Republic. Swiss Forestry Journal N10, 385-395.
18. Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova, I. and Buttoud, G. (2006) Assessment of an iterative process: the double spiral of re-designing participation. Forest Policy and Economics 8 (5), 529-541.
19. Lindblom, C. (1959) The science of 'muddling through'. Public Administration Review 19, 79-88.
20. Medawar, P. (1990) The Threat and Glory: Reflections on Science and Scientists. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
21. Shannon, M. (2002) Understanding collaboration as deliberative communication, organisational form and emergent institution. In: Gislerud, O. and Neven, I. (eds) National Forest Programmes in a European Context. Proceedings 44, EFI, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 7-26.
22. Yunusova, I., Buttoud, G. and Grisa, E. (2003) Reforming forest policy in Kyrgyzstan: impediments and success of the process in extreme ecological and unstable socio-economic environment. Austrian Journal of Forest Science 20, 73-82.