Home and Where the Heart Is: Marriage Timing and Joint Home Purchase;Où se trouve le coeur, là est la maison: Calendrier du mariage etachat conjoint d́un logement

European Journal of Population

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 65-89

  Holland, Jennifer A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Event history analysis; Housing; Marriage; Sweden

Indexed keywords

HOUSING; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MARRIAGE; MODELING;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84857064434     PISSN: 01686577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-011-9242-1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andersson, G. (2008). Family forerunners? Family dynamics in the Nordic countries versus Europe. Nordic Demographic Symposium. Helsinki, Finland.
2. Andersson, G., & Philipov, D. (2002). Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research, 7(4), 67-144.
3. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Bernhardt, E. (2002). Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations and plans. Scandinavian Population Studies, 13, 157-170.
5. Bernhardt, E. (2004). Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in Sweden. Austrian Institute for Family Studies publication.
6. Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Baizán, P. (2001). Leaving home in Europe: The experience of cohorts born around 1960. International Journal of Population Geography, 7(5), 339-356.
7. Blossfeld, H.-P., Golsch, K., & Rohwer, G. (2006). Event history analysis with Stata. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
8. Bøe, S. (2010). Sambos med barn bör gifta sig [Cohabitors with children should marry]. Stockholm: Dagens Nyheter.
9. Bracher, M., Santow, G., Morgan, S. P., & Trussell, J. (1993). Marriage dissolution in Australia: Models and explanations. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 47(3), 403-425.
10. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848-861.
11. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-220.
12. Dagens Nyheter. (2010). De flesta sparar till bröllopet [Most save for the wedding]. Stockholm: Dagens Nyheter.
13. Duvander, A.-Z. E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage: A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues, 20(5), 698-717.
14. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Feijten, P., & Mulder, C. H. (2002). The timing of household events and housing events in the Netherlands: A longitudinal perspective. Housing Studies, 17(5), 773-792.
16. Feijten, P., & van Ham, M. (2010). The impact of splitting up and divorce on housing careers in the UK. Housing Studies, 25(4), 483-507.
17. Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301-1312.
18. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U. S. women. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 506-519.
19. Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1214-1230.
20. Hiscock, R., Kearns, A., MacIntyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2001). Ontological security and psycho-social benefits from the home: Qualitative evidence on issues of tenure. Housing Theory and Society, 18(1-2), 50-66.
21. Hoem, J. M., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2006a). Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research: Part 1: Education and first childbearing. Demographic Research, 15(16), 461-484.
22. Hoem, J. M., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2006b). Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research: Part 2: Marriage and first birth. Demographic Research, 15(17), 485-498.
23. Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(1), 1-21.
24. Kulu, H., & Vikat, A. (2007). Fertility differences by housing type: The effect of housing conditions or of selective moves? Demographic Research, 17(26), 775-802.
25. Lauster, N. T. (2008). Better homes and families: Housing markets and young couple stability in Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(4), 891-903.
26. Lauster, N. T., & Fransson, U. (2006). Of marriages and mortgages: The second demographic transition and the relationship between marriage and homeownership in Sweden. Housing Studies, 21(6), 909-927.
27. Lesthaeghe, R. J., & van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografishe transities? (two demographic transitions?). In R. J. Lesthaeghe, & D. J. v. d. Kaa (Eds.), Bevolking: Groei en Krimp (Population: Growth and decline) (pp. 9-24). Deventer: van Loghum Slaterus.
28. Malmberg, B. (2010). Low fertility and the housing market: Evidence from Swedish regional data. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 26(2), 229-244.
29. Mandic, S. (2007). Entry to autonomous housing as an outcome of housing policy: A comparative analysis among groups of EU member states. Dublin: ENHR Comparative Housing Policy Working Group Workshop.
30. Megbolugbe, I. F., & Linneman, P. D. (1993). Home ownership. Urban Studies, 30(4-5), 659-682.
31. Michielin, F., & Mulder, C. H. (2008). Family events and the residential mobility of couples. Environment and Planning A, 40(11), 2770-2790.
32. Morgan, S. P., & King, R. B. (2001). Why have children in the 21st century? Biological predisposition, social coercion, rational choice. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 17(1), 3-20.
33. Mulder, C. H. (2006). Home-ownership and family formation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3), 281-298.
34. Mulder, C. H., & Billari, F. C. (2010). Homeownership regimes and low fertility. Housing Studies, 25(4), 527-541.
35. Mulder, C. H., & Lauster, N. T. (2010). Housing and family: An introduction. Housing Studies, 25(4), 433-440.
36. Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (1998). First-time home-ownership in the family life course: A West German-Dutch comparison. Urban Studies, 35(4), 687-713.
37. Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (2001). The connections between family formation and first-time home ownership in the context of West Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 17(2), 137-164.
38. Myrdal, A., & Myrdal, G. (1935). Kris i Befolkningsfrågan [Crisis in the population question]. Stockholm: A. Bonnier.
39. Noack, T., Bernhardt, E., Wiik, K. A., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2011). The realization of marriage plans among cohabiting couples in Scandinavia. In Population association of America annual meetings. Washington, DC: Population Association of America.
40. Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden's marriage revival: An analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 65(2), 183-200.
41. Scanlon, K., & Whitehead, C. (2004). International trends in housing tenure and mortgage finance. London: Council of Mortgage Lenders.
42. Smits, A., & Mulder, C. H. (2008). Family dynamics and first-time homeownership. Housing Studies, 23(6), 917-933.
43. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). Everything's there except money: how money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 680-696.
44. Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19(6), 85-138.
45. Statistics Sweden. (2008). Leaving home. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
46. Statistics Sweden. (2010). Real estate prices up to and including August 2010: Average price more than SEK 2 million. Press release. Statistics Sweden. Retrieved September 29, 2010, from http://www. scb. se/Pages/PressRelease____300300. aspx.
47. Ström, S. (2010). Housing and first births in Sweden, 1972-2005. Housing Studies, 25(4), 509-526.
48. Ström, S., & Brandén, M. (2006). HOLK-The codebook. Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.
49. Ström, S., Brandén, M., & Thomson, E. (2008). Self-reported retrospective housing biographies: A modified life history calendar approach. In Population association of America annual meetings. New Orleans, LA: Population Association of America.
50. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132-147.
51. Tucker, M. B. (2000). Marital values and expectations in context: Results from a 21-city survey. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 166-187). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
52. Thornton, A., & Philipov, D. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 25(2), 123-156.
53. Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39(2), 311-329.
54. Waaldijk, K. (Ed.). (2005). More or less together: Levels of legal consequences of marriage, cohabitation and registered partnership for different-sex and same-sex partners. Paris: Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques.
55. Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., & Noack, T. (2010). Love or money? Acta Sociologica, 53(3), 269-287.
56. Ytterberg, H., & Waaldijk, K. (2005). Major legal consequences of marriage, cohabitation and registered partnership for different-sex and same-sex partners in Sweden. In K. Waaldijk (Ed.), More or less together: Levels of legal consequences of marriage, cohabitation and registered partnership for different-sex and same-sex partners (pp. 169-186). Paris: Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques.