An ontology-based mechanism for automatic categorization of web services

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 214-236

  Kehagias, Dionysios D ^a   Giannoutakis, Konstantinos M ^a   Gravvanis, George A ^b   Tzovaras, Dimitrios ^a  

^a INFORMATICS AND TELEMATICS INSTITUTE   (Greece)

^b DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

data mining; ontologies; service categorization; Web services

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DATA MINING; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; WEBSITES;

AUTOMATIC CATEGORIZATION; AUTOMATIC MECHANISMS; SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL; SEMANTIC CATEGORIZATION; SEMANTIC INFORMATION; SERVICE CATEGORIZATION; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 84857052822     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1818     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ASK-IT: Ambient Intelligence System of Agents for Knowledge-based and Integrated Services for Elderly and Disabled Users. [27 April 2011].
2. OASIS: Open architecture for Accessible Services Integration and Standardisation. [27 April 2011].
3. Nguyen K, et al,. Semantic-enabled organization of Web services. In APWeb 2008 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4976), Zhang Y, et al. (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2008; 511-521, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78849-2-51. (Pubitemid 351693452)
4. UDDI version 3.0.2. [27 April 2011].
5. Sycara K, et al,. Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments. ACM SIGMOD Record, (Special Issue on Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems) 1999; 28 (1): 47-53. DOI: 10.1145/309844.309895. (Pubitemid 129553242)
6. Paolucci M, et al,. Semantic matching of Web services capabilities. In The Semantic Web-Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 2342), Springer-Verlag: London, 2002; 333-347, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48005-6-26.
7. Li L, Horrocks I,. A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic Web technology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2004; 8 (4): 39-60. (Pubitemid 39026783)
8. Kifer M, et al,. A Logical framework for Web service discovery. In ISWC 2004 Workshop on Semantic Web Services: Preparing to Meet the World of Business Applications (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 119), Martin D, et al. (eds). CEUR, 2004.
9. Liu F, et al,. Measuring similarity of Web services based on WSDL. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2010), IEEE Computer Society Washington DC, USA, 2010; 155-162, DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2010.67.
10. th Int. Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS). ACM Press: New York, USA, 2006; 915-922, DOI: 10.1145/1160633.1160796. (Pubitemid 46613751)
11. Klusch M, Kaufer F,. WSMO-MX: a hybrid semantic Web service matchmaker. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 2009; 7 (1): 23-42. DOI: 10.3233/WIA-2009- 0153.
12. Klusch M, et al,. SAWSDL-MX2: A machine-learning approach for integrating semantic Web service matchmaking variants. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2009), IEEE Computer Society: Washington DC, USA, 2009; 335-342, DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2009.76.
13. Martin D, et al,. Bringing semantics to Web services with OWL-S. World Wide Web 2007; 10 (3): 243-277. DOI: 10.1007/s11280-007-0033-x. (Pubitemid 47235911)
14. Bai L, Liu M,. A Fuzzy-set based semantic similarity matching algorithm for Web service. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, Vol. 2, IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 2008; 529-532, DOI: 10.1109/SCC.2008.147.
15. Bellur U, Vadodaria H,. On extending semantic matchmaking to include preconditions and effects. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2008), IEEE Computer Society: Washington DC, USA, 2008; 120-128, DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2008.18.
16. Web services description language (WSDL). [27 April 2011].
17. XML: extensible markup language. [27 April 2011].
18. Dong X, et al,. Similarity search for Web services, Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto, Canada, 29 August-3 September 2004; 372-383.
19. rd European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS). IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 2005; 14-16, DOI: 10.1109/ECOWS.2005.5.
20. Wang Y, Stroulia E,. Flexible interface matching for Web-service discovery. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press: Washington DC, 2003; 147-156, DOI: 10.1109/WISE.2003.1254478.
21. Elgazzar K, et al,. Clustering WSDL Documents to bootstrap the discovery of Web services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2010). IEEE Computer Society: Washington DC, USA, 2010; 147-154, DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2010.31.
22. Liang Q, et al,. Clustering Web services for automatic categorization. In SCC '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; 380-387, DOI: 10.1109/SCC.2009.39.
23. Yang Y, Joachims T,. Text categorization. Scholarpedia 2008; 3 (5): 4242.
24. nd International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 2010; 32-36, DOI: 10.1109/ICMLC.2010.61.
25. th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2004; 553-562, DOI: 10.1145/988672.988747. (Pubitemid 40752789)
26. st Intl. Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3387), Jorge C, Amit S, (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2005; 137-146, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30581-1-12. (Pubitemid 41231318)
27. He A, Kushmerick N,. Learning to attach semantic metadata to Web services. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2870), Fensel D, et al. (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2003; 258-273, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2-17.
28. Roman D, et al,. Web service modeling ontology. Applied Ontology 2005; 1 (1): 77-106.
29. Akkiraju R, et al,. Web Service Semantics -WSDL-S, W3C Member Submission, 2005. [27 April 2011].
30. th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4253), Gabrys B, et al. (eds). Springer-Verlag: 2006; 598-605, DOI: 10.1007/11893011-76. (Pubitemid 44700493)
31. Liang QA, Lam H,. Web Services matching by ontology instance categorization. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 2008; 202-209, DOI: 10.1109/SCC.2008.133.
32. Funk A, Bontcheva K,. Ontology-based categorization of Web services with machine learning. In Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation, Calzolari N, et al. (eds). European Language Resources Association, 2010; 482-488.
33. He J, et al,. A new automatic categorization algorithm for Web services. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 2010; 200-205, DOI: 10.1109/GrC.2010.78.
34. Corella MA, Castells P,. Semi-automatic semantic-based Web service classification. In Business Process Management Workshops (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4103), Dustdar S, et al. (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2006; 459-470, DOI: 10.1007/11837862-43. (Pubitemid 44543272)
35. Crasso M, et al,. AWSC: an approach to Web service classification based on machine learning techniques. Inteligencia Artificial, Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial 2008; 12 (37): 25-36.
36. Luo J, Li Y,. Anchor Semantics enabled ranking method for service discovery and integration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2008). IEEE Computer Society: Washington DC, USA, 2008; 732-739, DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2008.30.
37. Xiao H, et al,. An approach for context-aware service discovery and recommendation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2010). IEEE Computer Society: Washington DC, USA, 2010; 163-170, DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2010.95.
38. Averbakh A, et al,. Exploiting user feedback to improve semantic Web service discovery. In ISWC '09 Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009; 33-48, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9-3.
39. SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer (Second Edition). [27 April 2011].
40. Protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system [27 April 2011].
41. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview. [27 April 2011].
42. Feldman R, Sanger J,. The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches in Analyzing unstructured Data. Cambridge University Press: New York, NA, 2007.
43. WordNet: A lexical database for English. [27 April 2011].
44. Porter M,. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 1980; 14 (3): 130-137.
45. Lan M, et al,. A comprehensive comparative study on term weighting schemes for text classification with support vector machines. In Special interest tracks and posters of 14th International conference on World Wide Web. ACM: New York NY, USA, 2005; 1032-1033, DOI: 10.1145/1062745.1062854.
46. Pedersen T, et al,. WordNet::similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proceedings of Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-04). Association for Computational Linguistics: Morristown, NJ, 2004; 38-41.
47. Burkard R, et al,. Assignment Problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, 2009.
48. The OWL API. [27 April 2011].
49. Jena-A Semantic Web Framework for Java. [27 April 2011].
50. MWSAF: METEOR-S Web Service Annotation Framework Download page. [27 April 2011].