Intellectual Property, Dissemination of Innovation and Sustainable Development

Global Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 237-251

  Henry, Claude ^a,b   Stiglitz, Joseph E ^b,c  

^a SCIENCES PO   (France)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857047593     PISSN: 17585880     EISSN: 17585899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00048.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aghion, P. (2003) 'Empirical Estimates of the Relationship between Product Market Competition and Innovation', In J.-P. Touffut (ed.), Institutions, Innovation, and Growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 142-169.
2. Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. and Vickers, J. (2001) 'Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation', The Review of Economic Studies, 68 (3), pp. 467-492.
3. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Aigrain, P. (2005) Cause Commune. Paris: Editions Fayard.
5. Armstrong, M., Cowan, S. and Vickers, J. (1994) Regulation Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Barton, J. H. (1995) 'Patent Breadth and Antitrust: A Rethinking'. Paper presented at the Federal Trade Commission hearings on 'Global and Innovation-Based Competition', Washington, DC, 27 November.
7. Barton, J. H. (2007) 'Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuel, and Wind Technologies'. ICTSD Programme on Trade and Environment, Trade and Sustainable Energie Series, Issue Paper No. 2.
8. Bessen, J. and Maskin, E. (2009) 'Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation', RAND Journal of Economics, 40 (4), pp. 611-635.
9. Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats and Lawyers Put Innovation at Risk. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bhagwati, J. (2004) In Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. (2004) 'The Economics of Ideas and Intellectual Property', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, pp. 1253-1256.
12. Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. (2008) Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Boyle, J. (2003) 'The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain', Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (Winter/Spring), pp. 33-74.
14. Broothaerts, W., Mitchell, H. J. and Weir, B. (2005) 'Gene Transfer to Plants by Diverse Species of Bacteria', Nature, 433, pp. 629-631.
15. Chang, H. F. (1995) 'Patent Scope, Antitrust Policy, and Cumulative Innovation', RAND Journal of Economics, 26 (1), pp. 34-57.
16. Charlton, A. and Stiglitz, J. E. (2005) Free Trade for All. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (chaired by J. H. Barton) (2002) Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. London: UK Department for International Development.
18. Dasgupta, P and Stiglitz, J. E. (1980) 'Uncertainty, Market Structure, and the Speed of R&D', Bell Journal of Economics, 11 (1), pp. 1-28.
19. David, P. (1993) 'Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, Copyrights and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History', in M. B. Wallerstein, M. E. Mogee and R. A. Schoen (eds), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 19-61.
20. Denicoló, V. (2002) 'Two-Stage Patent Race and Patent Policy', RAND Journal of Economics, 31 (3), pp. 488-501.
21. Dosi, G., Marengo, L. and Pasquali, C. (2006) 'How Much should Society Fuel the Greed of Innovators? On the Relations between Appropriability, Opportunities and Rates of Innovation', Research Police, 35 (8), pp. 1110-1121.
22. Duffy, J. F. (2009) 'Ending the Patenting Monopoly: The Global Transition to Patent Office Decentralization', Patent Docs Blog, 20 May.
23. Duttfield, G. (2003) Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries. Aldershot: Ashgate.
24. Federal Trade Commission (2002) 'Competition, Economic and Business Perspectives on Substantive Patent Issues: Non-obviousness and Other Patentability Criteria'. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Roundtable, 30 October 2002. Available from: http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/021030trans.pdf [accessed 13 August 2010].
25. Federal Trade Commission (2003) 'To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy'. Report by the Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.
26. Gallini, N. and Scotchmer, S. (2002) 'Intellectual Property: When is it the Best Incentive System?', in A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stem (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 51-78.
27. Greenwald, B. and Stiglitz, J. E. (2006) 'Helping Infant Economies Grow: Foundations of Trade Policies for Developing Countries', American Economic Review: AEA Papers and Proceedings, 96 (2), pp. 141-146.
28. Greenwald, B. and Stiglitz, J. E. (forthcoming) Creating a Learning Society: A New Paradigm for Development and Social Progress. First Annual Arrow Lecture, Columbia University. New York: Columbia University Press.
29. Harhoff, D. P., Régibeau, P. and Rockett, K. (2001) 'Some Simple Economics of GM Food', Economic Policy, 16 (33), pp. 263-299.
30. Haruvy, E, Wu, F. and Chakravarty, S. (2003) 'Incentives for Developers' Contributions and Product Performance Metrics in Open Source Development'. Working Paper. Available from: http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/publications/data/2005-03-04sujoy.pdf [accessed 13 August 2010].
31. Henry, C. and Matheu, M. (2001) 'New Regulations for Public Services in Competition', in C. Henry, M. Matheu and A. Jeunemaître (eds), Regulation of Network Utilities: The European Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-35.
32. Henry, E. (2010) 'Runner-Up Patents: Is Monopoly Inevitable? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 112 (2), pp. 417-440.
33. Henry, E. and Ponce, C. J. (2009) 'Waiting to Imitate: On the Dynamic Pricing of Knowledge'. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 7511.
34. Hertel, G., Krishnan, M. and Slaughter, S. (2003) 'Motivation in Open Source Projects: An Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel', Research Policy, 32 (7), pp. 1159-1177.
35. Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J. (2004) Innovation and its Discontents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Jayadev, A. and Stiglitz, J. E. (2010) 'Medicine for Tomorrow: Some Alternative Proposals to Promote Socially Beneficial Research and Development in Pharmaceuticals', Journal of Generic Medicines, 7 (3), pp. 217-226.
37. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002) 'Some Simple Economics of Open Source', Journal of Industrial Economics, 52 (2), pp. 197-234.
38. Lewis, T. and Reichman, J. (2005) 'Using Liability Rules to Stimulate Local Innovation in Developing Countries: Application to Traditional Knowledge', in K. Maskus and J. Reichman (eds), International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-366.
39. Maskin, E. (2007) 'Mechanism Design: How to Implement Social Goals', Nobel Lecture, American Economic Review, 98 (3), pp. 567-576.
40. Maskus, K. and Reichman, J. H. (2004) 'The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods', Journal of International Economic Law, 7 (2), pp. 279-320.
41. Merges, R. P. and Duffy, J. F. (2007) Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials, Dayton, OH: LexisNexis.
42. Merges, R. P. and Nelson, R. R. (1990) 'On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope', Columbia Law Review, 90 (4), pp. 839-916.
43. Nalebuff, B. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1983a) 'Information, Competition and Markets', American Economic Review, 73 (2), pp. 278-284.
44. Nalebuff, B. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1983b) 'Prizes and Incentives: Toward a General Theory of Compensation and Competition', Bell Journal, 14 (1), pp. 21-43.
45. Nickell, S. (1996) 'Competition and Corporate Performance', Journal of Political Economy, 104 (4), pp. 724-746.
46. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Pennisi, E. (2009) 'Systemic Researchers Want to Fend Off Patents', Science, 325, 7 August, p. 664.
48. Pozen, R. (2009) 'Inventing a Better Patent System', New York Times, 16 November, p. A33.
49. Scherer, F. M. (1998) 'Comments on Intellectual Property, Technology Diffusion, and Growth', in R. D. Anderson and N. T. Gallini (eds), Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 104-108.
50. Schumpeter, J. (1911) Theorie der witschaftlichen Entwicklung, translated into English (1934) as The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Scotchmer, S. (1991) 'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), pp. 29-41.
52. Scotchmer, S. (1999) 'Cumulative Innovation in Theory and Practice'. Discussion paper, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
53. Shapiro, C. (2000) 'Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting', in A. Jaffe and J. Lerner (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 119-150.
54. Stiglitz, J. E. (1987) 'On the Microeconomics of Technical Progress', in J. M. Katz (ed.), Technology Generation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries. London: Macmillan, pp. 56-77.
55. Stiglitz, J. E. (1999) 'Knowledge as a Global Public Good', in I. Kaul, I. Grunberg and M. A. Stern (eds), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. United Nations Development Programme. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 308-325.
56. Stiglitz, J. E. (2006) Making Globalization Work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
57. Stiglitz, J. E. (2008) 'The Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property', Duke Law Journal, 57 (6), pp. 1693-1724.
58. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010a) Declaration to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. US Patent and Trademark Office et al., Civil Action No. 09-4515 (RWS). Available from: http://www.aclu.org/files/assets/2010_01_20_-_Declaration_of_Joseph_E__Stiglitz.PDF [Accessed 13 August 2010].
59. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010b) 'Introduction', in J. Schumpeter, Socialism, Capitalism, and Democracy. London: Routledge, pp. ix-xiv.
60. Stiglitz, J. E. (forthcoming) 'Towards a Pro-development and Balanced Intellectual Property Regime', in J. E. Stiglitz and D. Kennedy (eds), Law and Economics with Chinese Characteristics: Institutions for Promoting Development in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.
61. Suppan, S., (2007) 'Patents: Taken for Granted in Plans for a Global Biofuels Market'. Report, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, MN, 18 October.
62. Tirole, J. (2003) 'Protection de la propriété intellectuelle: une introduction et quelques pistes de réflexion'. Rapport du Conseil d'Analyse Economique, Premier minister. Paris: Documentation française.
63. Tom, W. K. and Newberg, J. A. (1998) 'US Enforcement Approaches to the Antitrust-Intellectual Property Interface', in R. D. Anderson and N. T. Gallini (eds), Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 343-393.
64. Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Weber, S. (2005) The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. World Bank (1998) Knowledge for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
67. World Bank (2001) Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries: Making Trade Work for the World's Poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
68. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization (2004) A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All. Geneva: ILO.