Open versus laparoscopic liver resection: Looking beyond the immediate postoperative period

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 468-472

  Gustafson, Joshua D ^a   Fox, Justin P ^a   Ouellette, James R ^a   Hellan, Minia ^a   Termuhlen, Paula ^a   McCarthy, Mary C ^a   Thambi Pillai, Thavam ^b,c  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^c Sanford Transplant Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic; Liver resection; Morbidity; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER CANCER; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MORBIDITY; OPEN LIVER RESECTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84857045819     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1902-z     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nationwide Inpatient Sample. http://hcupnet.ahrq.go. Accessed 17 Oct 2010
2. KT Nguyen TC Gamblin DA Geller 2009 World review of laparoscopic liver resection: 2,804 patients Ann Surg 250 5 831 841 19801936 10.1097/SLA. 0b013e3181b0c4df
3. Y Endo M Ohta A Sasaki S Kai H Eguchi K Iwaki K Shibata S Kitano 2009 A comparative study of the long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open left lateral hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 19 e171 e174 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bc4091
4. K Ito H Ito C Are PJ Allen Y Fong RP Dematteo WR Jarnagin MI D'Angelica 2009 Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched-pair case-control study J Gastrointest Surg 13 12 2276 2283 19727974 10.1007/s11605-009-0993-5
5. XJ Cai YF Wang YL Liang H Yu X Liang 2009 Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: a safety and feasibility study of 19 cases Surg Endosc 23 11 2556 2562 19347401 10.1007/s00464-009-0454-y
6. AJ Koffron G Auffenberg R Kung M Abecassis 2007 Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more Ann Surg 246 385 392 17717442 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318146996c (discussion 392-394)
7. O Farges P Jagot P Kirstetter J Marty J Belghiti 2002 Prospective assessment of the safety and benefit of laparoscopic liver resections J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg 9 242 248 10.1007/s005340200026 (Pubitemid 34662323)
8. JF Buell MT Thomas S Rudich M Marvin R Nagubandi KV Ravindra G Brock KM McMasters 2008 Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures Ann Surg 248 475 486 18791368
9. JF Buell MJ Thomas TC Doty KS Gersin TD Merchen M Gupta SM Rudich ES Woodle 2004 An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery Surgery 136 804 811 15467665 10.1016/j.surg.2004.07.002 (Pubitemid 39311306)
10. T van Gulik 2009 Open versus laparoscopic resection for liver tumours HPB Oxf 11 465 468 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00080.x
11. SF Jencks MV Williams EA Coleman 2009 Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program N Engl J Med 360 1418 1428 19339721 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvFGju7c%3D
12. T Vanounou JL Steel KT Nguyen A Tsung JW Marsh DA Geller TC Gamblin 2010 Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection Ann Surg Oncol 17 4 998 1009 20033324 10.1245/s10434-009-0839-0
13. D Castaing E Vibert L Ricca D Azoulay R Adam B Gayet 2009 Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in two specialized centers Ann Surg 250 5 849 855 19801934 10.1097/SLA. 0b013e3181bcaf63
14. CH Pilgrim H To V Usatoff PM Evans 2009 Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe procedure for cancer patients HPB Oxf 11 247 251 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009. 00045.x