An analysis of delayed breast reconstruction outcomes as recorded in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 289-294

  Ogunleye, Adeyemi A ^c   De Blacam, Catherine ^a   Curtis, Michael S ^b   Colakoglu, Salih ^a   Tobias, Adam M ^a   Lee, Bernard T ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Complications; Infection; Morbidity; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL INFECTION; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84857040453     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: 18780539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, and W. Henderson The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care J Am Coll Surg 180 1995 519 531
2. American College of Surgeons National surgical quality improvement programme [ACS NSQIP website] Available at: 2008 www.acsnsqip.org/ [accessed 20.09.10]
3. S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, and W.G. Henderson The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs Arch Surg 137 2002 20 27
4. S.F. Khuri, W.G. Henderson, and J. Daley Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study Ann Surg 248 2008 329 336
5. H.B. Neuman, F. Michelassi, and J.W. Turner Surrounded by quality metrics: what do surgeons think of ACS-NSQIP? Surgery 145 2009 27 33
6. M.E. Cohen, K.Y. Bilimoria, and C.Y. Ko Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery J Am Coll Surg 208 2009 1009 1016
7. M.E. Cohen, K.Y. Bilimoria, and C.Y. Ko Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program Ann Surg 250 2009 901 907
8. J. Feinglass, W.H. Pearce, and G.J. Martin Postoperative and late survival outcomes after major amputation: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgery 130 2001 21 29
9. J. Feinglass, W.H. Pearce, and G.J. Martin Postoperative and amputation-free survival outcomes after femorodistal bypass grafting surgery: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program J Vasc Surg 34 2001 283 290
10. R. Gedaly, P.P. McHugh, and T.D. Johnston Obesity, diabetes, and smoking are important determinants of resource utilization in liver resection: a multicenter analysis of 1029 patients Ann Surg 249 2009 414 419
11. E.M. Grossmann, W.E. Longo, and K.S. Virgo Morbidity and mortality of gastrectomy for cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers Surgery 131 2002 484 490
12. H.T. Hua, R.P. Cambria, and S.K. Chuang Early outcomes of endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the national surgical quality improvement program-private sector (NSQIP-PS) J Vasc Surg 41 2005 382 389
13. M.M. Hutter, S. Randall, and S.F. Khuri Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the national surgical quality improvement program Ann Surg 243 2006 657 662 Discussion 662-656
14. O.N. Johnson 3rd, A.N. Sidawy, and J.M. Scanlon Impact of obesity on outcomes after open surgical and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair J Am Coll Surg 210 2010 166 177
15. H.M. Kaafarani, T.S. Smith, and L. Neumayer Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals Am J Surg 200 2010 32 40
16. E.H. Livingston, D. Arterburn, and T.L. Schifftner National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis of bariatric operations: modifiable risk factors contribute to bariatric surgical adverse outcomes J Am Coll Surg 203 2006 625 633
17. J.A. Margenthaler, W.E. Longo, and K.S. Virgo Risk factors for adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction Ann Surg 243 2006 456 464
18. J.A. Margenthaler, W.E. Longo, and K.S. Virgo Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults Ann Surg 238 2003 59 66
19. L. Neumayer, P. Hosokawa, and K. Itani Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study J Am Coll Surg 204 2007 1178 1187
20. K.R. Tuggle, G. Ortega, and O.B. Bolorunduro Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database J Surg Res 2010
21. J.M. Corman, D.F. Penson, and K. Hur Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the national veterans administration surgical quality improvement program BJU Int 86 2000 782 789
22. L.P. Wallner, R.L. Dunn, and A.V. Sarma Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after urologic surgery: the national surgical quality improvement program J Am Coll Surg 207 2008 904 913
23. E.V. Fehringer, T.R. Mikuls, and K.D. Michaud Shoulder arthroplasties have fewer complications than hip or knee arthroplasties in US veterans Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 2010 717 722
24. T.A. Radcliff, W.G. Henderson, and T.J. Stoner Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 2008 34 42
25. K.C. Podratz Quality improvement in gynecologic surgery: the new frontier Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 2006 891 895
26. E.J. Kezirian, E.M. Weaver, and B. Yueh Incidence of serious complications after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Laryngoscope 114 2004 450 453
27. S.R. Schwartz, B. Yueh, and C. Maynard Predictors of wound complications after laryngectomy: a study of over 2000 patients Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131 2004 61 68
28. J.D. Birkmeyer, D.M. Shahian, and J.B. Dimick Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: national surgical quality improvement program J Am Coll Surg 207 2008 777 782
29. American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010 report of the 2009 statistics; national clearinghouse of plastics surgery statistics [ASPS website] Available at: 2010 http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/Media/statistics/2009-US- cosmeticreconstructiveplasticsurgeryminimally-invasive-statistics.pdf [accessed 20.09.10]
30. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program User guide for the 2008 participant use data file [NSQIP online user guide] Available at: 2009 https://acsnsqip.org/puf/docs/ACS-NSQIP-Participant- User-Data-File-User-Guide.pdf [accessed 20.09.10]
31. S. Vega, J.M. Smartt Jr., and S. Jiang 500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience Plast Reconstr Surg 122 2008 329 339
32. C.M. McCarthy, B.J. Mehrara, and E. Riedel Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk Plast Reconstr Surg 121 2008 1886 1892
33. C.M. Chen, E.G. Halvorson, and J.J. Disa Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps Plast Reconstr Surg 120 2007 1477 1482
34. A.K. Alderman, E.G. Wilkins, and H.M. Kim Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the michigan breast reconstruction outcome study Plast Reconstr Surg 109 2002 2265 2274
35. M.A. Olsen, M. Lefta, and J.R. Dietz Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation J Am Coll Surg 207 2008 326 335
36. S.R. Sullivan, D.R. Fletcher, and C.D. Isom True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 122 2008 19 28
37. L.D. Crespo, T.J. Eberlein, and N. O'Connor Postmastectomy complications in breast reconstruction Ann Plast Surg 32 1994 452 456
38. D.W. Chang, B. Wang, and G.L. Robb Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 105 2000 1640 1648
39. J.A. Greco 3rd, E.T. Castaldo, and L.B. Nanney Autologous breast reconstruction: the Vanderbilt experience (1998 to 2005) of independent predictors of displeasing outcomes J Am Coll Surg 207 2008 49 56
40. J.C. Selber, J.E. Kurichi, and S.J. Vega Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction Ann Plast Surg 56 2006 492 497
41. N.V. Tran, G.R. Evans, and S.S. Kroll Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 106 2000 313 317 Discussion 318-320
42. L.A. Woerdeman, J.J. Hage, and M.M. Hofland A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria Plast Reconstr Surg 119 2007 455 463
43. B.T. Lee, T.A. Adesiyun, and S. Colakoglu Postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: an analysis of complications and patient satisfaction Ann Plast Surg 64 2010 679 683
44. V. Pinsolle, C. Grinfeder, and S. Mathoulin-Pelissier Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59 2006 1017 1024
45. S.L. Spear, I. Ducic, and F. Cuoco The effect of smoking on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 116 2005 1873 1880
46. S.J. Goodwin, C.M. McCarthy, and A.L. Pusic Complications in smokers after postmastectomy tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction Ann Plast Surg 55 2005 16 19 Discussion 19-20
47. L. Neumayer How do (and why should) I use the national surgical quality improvement program? Am J Surg 198 2009 S36 S40
48. B.L. Hall, K. Richards, and A. Ingraham New approaches to the national surgical quality improvement program: the American College of Surgeons experience Am J Surg 198 2009 S56 S62
49. K. Hammermeister The national surgical quality improvement program: learning from the past and moving to the future Am J Surg 198 2009 S69 S73
50. British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit 2011 Available at: http://www.bapras.org.uk/page.asp?id=750 [accessed 17.05.11]