Experimental determination of unsteady aerodynamic coefficients and flutter behavior of a rigid wing

Journal of Fluids and Structures

Volumn 29, Issue , 2012, Pages 50-61

  Song, Jieun ^a   Kim, Taehyoun ^b   Song, Seung Jin ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic ROM; Aeroelastic ROM; Flutter prediction; System identification; Unsteady aerodynamics; Wind tunnel test

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC MODELS; AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOR; AEROELASTIC MODELS; AIR SPEED; DISCRETE-TIME; DYNAMIC PRESSURES; EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; FLUTTER POINTS; FLUTTER SPEED; GROUND VIBRATION TESTS; LOW SPEED; MODEL YIELDS; MOTION SENSORS; PRESSURE DATA; REDUCED ORDER; STATE-SPACE; STRUCTURAL MODELS; SUB-CRITICAL; SUBSONIC WIND TUNNELS; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION METHODS; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIONS; TIME HISTORY; UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC FORCE; UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS; VARIABLE DYNAMICS; WIND TUNNEL TEST; WING MOTION;

FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); FORECASTING; MODEL STRUCTURES; RIGID WINGS;

AEROELASTICITY;

EID: 84857037882     PISSN: 08899746     EISSN: 10958622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cooper J.E., Emmett P.R., Wright J.R. Envelope function-a tool for analyzing flutter data. Journal of Aircraft 1993, 30(5):785-790.
2. Dimitriadis G., Cooper J.E. Flutter prediction from flight flutter test data. Journal of Aircraft. 2001, 38(2):355-367.
3. Dowell E.H., Thomas J.P., Hall K.C. Transonic limit cycle oscillation analysis using reduced order aerodynamic models. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2004, 19(1):17-27.
4. Epureanu B.I., Dowell E.H., Hall K.C. Reduced-order models of unsteady transonic viscous flows in turbomachinery. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2000, 14(8):1215-1234.
5. Epureanu B.I., Hall K.C., Dowell E.H. Reduced-order models of unsteady viscous flows in turbomachinery using viscous-inviscid coupling. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2001, 15(2):255-273.
6. Juang J.N. Applied System Identification 1994, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7. Kehoe, M.W., 1995. A historical overview of flight flutter testing. NASA TM-4720.
8. Kim T. New system identification for couple fluid-structure systems: aerodynamics is aeroelasticity minus structure. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics 2009, 2009-2073.
9. Kim T. System identification for coupled fluid-structures: aerodynamics is aeroelasticity minus structure. AIAA Journal 2011, 49(3):503-512.
10. Liberge E., Hamdouni A. Reduced order modelling method via proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for flow around an oscillating cylinder. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2010, 26(2):292-311.
11. Lind R., Brenner M. Flutterometer: an on-line tool to predict robust flutter margins. Journal of Aircraft 2000, 37(6):1105-1112.
12. Lind R., Voracek D.F., Truax R., Doyle T., Potter S., Brenner M. A flight test to demonstrate flutter and evaluate the flutterometer. Aeronautical Journal 2003, 107:577-588.
13. Lind R. Flight testing with the flutterometer. Journal of Aircraft 2003, 40(3):574-579.
14. Lind R. Flight-test evaluation of flutter prediction methods. Journal of Aircraft 2003, 40(5):964-970.
15. Nissim, E., Gilyard, G.B., 1989. Method for experimental determination of flutter speed by parameter identification. NASA Technical Paper 2923.
16. Prince S.J., Lee H.K. Evaluation and extension of the flutter-margin method for flight flutter prediction. Journal of Aircraft 1993, 30(4):395-402.
17. Shahverdi H., Nobari A.S., Behbahani-Nejad M., Haddadpour H. Aeroelastic analysis of helicopter rotor blade in hover using an efficient reduced-order aerodynamic model. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2009, 25(8):1243-1257.
18. Torii H., Matsuzaki Y. Flutter margin evaluation for discrete-time systems. Journal of Aircraft. 2001, 38(1):42-47.
19. Zimmerman N.H., Weissenburger J.T. Prediction of flutter onset speed based on flight testing at subcritical speeds. Journal of Aircraft 1964, 1(4):190-202.