Identification of infants with major cognitive delay using parental report

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 254-259

  Martin, Andrew J ^a   Darlow, Brian A ^b   Salt, Alison ^c   Hague, Wendy ^a   Sebastian, Lucille ^a   Mann, Kristy ^a   Tarnow Mordi, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR COGNITIVE DELAY; MALE; NEWBORN SEPSIS; PARENT REPORT OF CHILDREN ABILITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; PARENTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84857034391     PISSN: 00121622     EISSN: 14698749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04161.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Salt A, Redshaw M. Neurodevelopmental follow-up after preterm birth: follow up after two years. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 185-97.
2. American Academy of Pediatrics. Postnatal corticosteroids to treat or prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 330-8.
3. Saudino KJ, Dale PS, Oliver B, et al. The validity of parent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of 2-year-olds. Br J Dev Psychol 1998; 16: 349-63.
4. Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Stoskopf B, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the health-status of extremely low-birth-weight children at 8years of age - comparison with a reference group. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 411-7.
5. Johnson S, Marlow N, Wolke D, et al. Validation of a parent report measure of cognitive development in very preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 389-97.
6. Johnson S, Wolke D, Marlow N. Developmental assessment of preterm infants at 2years: validity of parent reports. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 58-62.
7. The INIS Study Collaborative Group. The INIS Study. International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study: non-specific intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for suspected or proven neonatal sepsis: an international, placebo controlled, multicentre randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 52.
8. Marlow N, Greenough A, Peacock JL, et al. Randomised trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation in babies of gestational age 28weeks or less: respiratory and neurological outcomes at 2years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: F320-6.
9. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edn: Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1993.
10. Bell S, Allen B. Book Review: Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edn: Manual. J Psychoeducational Assess 2000; 18: 185-95.
11. Johnson S, Marlow N. Developmental screen or developmental testing? Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 173-83.
12. Johnson S, Wolke D, Marlow N. Outcome monitoring in preterm populations - measures and methods. J Psychol 2008; 216: 135-46.
13. Albers CA, Grieve AJ. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third edition. J Psychoeducational Assess 2007; 25: 180-90.
14. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd edn. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, 2006.
15. Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164: 352-6.
16. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 9-19.
17. NPEU. Disability and Perinatal Care: Measurement of Health Status at Two Years. A Report of Two Working Groups Convened by the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit and the Former Oxford Regional Health Authority. Oxford: NPEU, 1994.
18. Johnson A. Follow up studies: a case for a standard minimum data set. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: F61-3.
19. Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J, Eastaugh J, Griffin C. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 2003; 289: 2554-9.
20. The INIS Study Collaborative Group. Treatment of neonatal sepsis with intravenous immunoglobulin: INIS Study. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1201-11.
21. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-45.
22. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1297-310.
23. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ 1994; 309: 102.
24. Askie L, Brocklehurst P, Darlow B, et al. NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol. BMC Pediatr 2011; 11: 6.