Behavioural responses of harbour seals to human-induced disturbances

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 113-121

  Andersen, S M ^a,b   Teilmann, J ^a   Dietz, R ^a   Schmidt, N M ^a   Miller, L A ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anthropogenic disturbance; Boat; Conservation; Pedestrian; Phoca vitulina; Pinnipeds; Wildlife management; Wildlife tourism

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BREEDING SEASON; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DISTURBANCE; ECOTOURISM; HABITUATION; HAULOUT BEHAVIOUR; HUMAN ACTIVITY; MARINE PARK; PINNIPED; REPRODUCTIVE CYCLE; TRADE-OFF; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANHOLT; DENMARK; MIDTJYLLAND;

PHOCA; PHOCA VITULINA; PINNIPEDIA;

EID: 84857031217     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1244     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allen SG, Ainley DG, Page GW, Ribic CA. 1984. The effect of disturbance on harbor seal haul out patterns at Bolinas Lagoon, California. Fishery Bulletin 82: 493-500.
2. Andersen SM, Teilmann J, Harders PB, Hansen EH, Hjøllund D. 2007. Diet of harbour seals and great cormorants in Lim-fjord, Denmark: interspecific competition and interaction with fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 1235-1245.
3. Arroyo B, Razin M. 2006. Effect of human activities on bearded vulture behaviour and breeding success in the French Pyrenees. Biological Conservation 128: 276-284.
4. Baird RW, Hanson MB, Dill LM. 2005. Factors influencing the diving behaviour of fish-eating killer whales: sex differences and diel and interannual variation in diving rates. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83: 257-267.
5. Beale CM. 2007. The behavioral ecology of disturbance responses. International Journal of Comparative Physiology 20: 111-120.
6. Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Gales N, Mann J, Connor R, Heithaus M, Watson-Capps J, Flaherty C, Krutzen M. 2006a. Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conservation Biology 20: 1791-1798.
7. Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Gales N. 2006b. Interpreting short-term behavioural responses to disturbance within a longitudinal perspective. Animal Behaviour 72: 1149-1158.
8. Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Finn H, Allen S. 2009. Impact assessment research: use and misuse of habituation, sensitisation and tolerance in describing wildlife responses to anthropogenic stimuli. Marine Ecology Progress Series 395: 177-185.
9. Bennett VJ, Beard M, Zollner PA, Fernandez-Juricic E, Westphal L, LeBlanc CL. 2009. Understanding wildlife responses to human disturbance through simulation modelling: a management tool. Ecological Complexity 6: 113-134.
10. Blumstein DT, Anthony LL, Harcourt R, Ross G. 2003. Testing a key assumption of wildlife buffer zones: is flight initiation distance a species-specific trait? Biological Conservation 110: 97-100.
11. Boren LJ, Gemmell NJ, Barton KJ. 2002. Tourist disturbance on New Zealand fur seals Arctocephalus forsteri. Australian Mammalogy 24: 85-95.
12. Casas F, Mougeot F, Vinuela J, Bretagnolle V. 2009. Effects of hunting on the behaviour and spatial distribution of farmland birds: importance of hunting-free refuges in agricultural areas. Animal Conservation 12: 346-354.
13. Cassini MH. 2001. Behavioural responses of South American fur seals to approach by tourists - a brief report. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 341-346.
14. Cassini MH, Szteren D, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2004. Fence effects on the behavioural responses of South American fur seals to tourist approaches. Journal of Ethology 22: 127-133.
15. Cunningham L, Baxter JM, Boyd IL, Duck CD, Lonergan M, Moss SE, Mcconnell B. 2009. Harbour seal movements and haul-out patterns: implications for monitoring and management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 398-407.
16. Da Silva J, Terhune JM. 1988. Harbor seal grouping as an anti-predator strategy. Animal Behaviour 36: 1309-1316.
17. Danish Maritime Safety Administration. 2011. [16 August 2011].
18. Danish Nature Agency. 2009. Alphabetic list of the Danish nature and wildlife reserves. [8 August 2011].
19. Edrén SMC, Andersen SM, Teilmann J, Carstensen J, Harders PB, Dietz R, Miller LA. 2010. The effect of a large Danish offshore wind farm on harbor and gray seal haul-out behavior. Marine Mammal Science 26: 614-634.
20. Foster BR, Rahs EY. 1983. Mountain goat response to hydroelectric exploration in northwestern British-Columbia. Environmental Management 7: 189-197.
21. Fowler GS. 1999. Behavioral and hormonal responses of Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) to tourism and nest site visitation. Biological Conservation 90: 143-149.
22. Gerrodette T, Gilmartin WG. 1990. Demographic consequences of changed pupping and hauling sites of the Hawaiian Monk Seal. Conservation Biology 4: 423-430.
23. Gill JA, Sutherland WJ, Watkinson AR. 1996. A method to quantify the effects of human disturbance on animal populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 786-792.
24. Gill JA, Norris K, Sutherland WJ. 2001. Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance. Biological Conservation 97: 265-268.
25. Härkönen T, Dietz R, Reijnders P, Teilmann J, Harding K, Hall A, Brasseur S, Siebert U, Goodman SJ, Jepson PD, et al. 2006. A review of the 1988 and 2002 phocine distemper virus epidemics in European harbour seals. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 68: 115-130.
26. Henry E, Hammill MO. 2001. Impact of small boats on the haulout activity of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in Métis Bay, Saint Lawrence Estuary, Québec, Canada. Aquatic Mammals 27: 140-148.
27. Higham JES, Shelton EJ. 2011. Tourism and wildlife habituation: reduced population fitness or cessation of impacts? Tourism Management 32: 1290-1298.
28. Holcomb K, Young JK, Gerber LR. 2009. The influence of human disturbance on California sea lions during the breeding season. Animal Conservation 12: 592-598.
29. Jepsen PU. 2005. Management Plan for Common Seal (Phoca vitulina) and Grey Seal (Halichoerus grypus) in Denmark. (In Danish). Ministry of Environment, Danish Nature Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. 37pp.
30. Johnson A, Acevedo-Gutierrez A. 2007. Regulation compliance by vessels and disturbance of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). Canadian Journal of Zoology 85: 290-294.
31. Kenyon KW. 1972. Man versus monk seal. Journal of Mammalogy 53: 687-696.
32. Kovacs KM, Innes S. 1990. The impact of tourism on harp seals (Phoca Groenlandica) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 15-26.
33. Kreutzer M, Kreutzer R, Siebert U, Muller G, Reijnders P, Brasseur S, Härkönen T, Dietz R, Sonne C, Born EW, Baumgartner W. 2008. In search of virus carriers of the 1988 and 2002 phocine distemper virus outbreaks in European harbour seals. Archives of Virology 153: 187-192.
34. Lusseau D, Bejder L. 2007. The Long-term consequences of short-term responses to disturbance experiences from whalewatching impact assessment. International Journal of Comparative Physiology 20: 228-236.
35. Olsen MT, Andersen SM, Teilmann J, Dietz R, Edrén SMC, Linnet A, Härkönen T. 2010. Status of the harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) in southern Scandinavia. NAMMCO Scientific Publications 8: 77-94.
36. Petel TDV, Terhune JM, Hindell MA, Giese MA. 2006. An assessment of the audibility of sound from human transport by breeding Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii). Wildlife Research 33: 275-291.
37. Ragen TJ. 1999. Human activities affecting the population trends of the Hawaiian monk seal. American Fisheries Society Symposium: Monterey, CA.
38. Rees EC, Bruce JH, White GT. 2005. Factors affecting the behavioural responses of whooper swans (Cygnus c. cygnus) to various human activities. Biological Conservation 121: 369-382.
39. Reijnders PJH. 1981. Management and Conservation of the harbor seal, Phoca vitulina, population in the International Wadden Sea Area. Biological Conservation 19: 213-221.
40. Renouf D, Gaborko L, Galway G, Finlayson R. 1981. The effect of disturbance on the daily movements of harbor seals and grey seals between the sea and their hauling grounds at Miquelon. Applied Animal Ethology 72: 1149-1158.
41. Rodgers JA, Smith HT. 1997. Buffer zone distances to protect foraging and leafing waterbirds from human disturbance in Florida. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 139-145.
42. Stankowich T, Coss RG. 2007. Effects of risk assessment, predator behavior, and habitat on escape behavior in Columbian black-tailed deer. Behavioral Ecology 18: 358-367.
43. Stillman RA, Goss-Custard JD. 2002. Seasonal changes in the response of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus to human disturbance. Journal of Avian Biology 33: 358-365.
44. Suryan RM, Harvey JT. 1999. Variability in reactions of Pacific harbor seals, Phoca vitulina richardsi, to disturbance. Fishery Bulletin 97: 332-339.
45. Taylor AR, Knight RL. 2003. Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecological Applications 13: 951-963.
46. Teilmann J, Rigét F, Härkönen T. 2010. Optimizing survey design for Scandinavian harbour seals: population trend as an ecological quality element. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 952-958.
47. Venables UM, Venables LSV, Matthews LH. 1955. Observations on a breeding colony of the seal Phoca vitulina in Shetland. Proceeding of the Zoological Society of London 125: 521-532.
48. Whitfield DP, Ruddock M, Bullman R. 2008. Expert opinion as a tool for quantifying bird tolerance to human disturbance. Biological Conservation 141: 2708-2717.