Changes in leaf area index, light interception, quality and dry matter yield of an abandoned rangeland as affected by the different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization

Turkish Journal of Field Crops

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 117-120

  Budakli Carpici, Emine ^a  

^a ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ADF; Crude protein; Dry matter yield; NDF; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; TDN

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857015912     PISSN: 13011111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ayan, I., H. Mut, O. Onal-Asci, U. Basaran and Z. Acar, 2010. Effect of manure application on the chemical composition and nutritive value of rangeland hay. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9(13):1852-1857.
2. Aydin, I. and F. Uzun, 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of rangelands affects yield, forage quality and the botanical composition. European Journal of Agronomy, 23:8-14.
3. Balabanli{dotless}, C., S. Albayrak and O. Yüksel, 2010. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on the quality and yield of native rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 2010, 15(2): 164-168
4. Ball D.M., M. Collins, G.D. Lacefield, N.P. Martin, D.A. Mertens, K.E. Olson, D.H. Putnam, D.J. Undersander and M.W. Wolf. 2001. Understanding forage quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL
5. Celebi, Z.C., O. Arvas and O. Terzioglu, 2011. The effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application on herbage yield of natural pastures. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 14(1):53-58.
6. Dasci{dotless}, M. and B. Comakli{dotless}, 2011. Effects of fertilization on forage yield and quality in range sites with different topographic structure. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 2011, 16(1): 15-22
7. Elliott, D.E., R. J. Abbott, 2003. Nitrogen fertilizer use on rainfed pasture in the Mt. Lofty Ranges. 1. Pasture mass, composition and nutritive characteristics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 43: 553-577.
8. Erkovan, H.I., M.K. Gullap, M. Dasci{dotless} and A. Koc, 2009. Changes in leaf area index, forage quality and above-ground biomass in grazed and ungrazed rangelands of eastern anatolia region. Tari{dotless}m Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(3):217-223.
9. Frame, J., 1992. Improved Grassland Management. Farming Pres Books, Ipswich.
10. Goering, M.K. and P.J. Van Soest 1970. Forage Fibre Analysis. USDA Agricultural Handbook, USA,379,1-20.
11. Gokkus, A. and A. Koc, 1995. Hay yield, botanical composition and useful hay content of meadows in relation to fertilizer and herbicide application. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 19: 23-29.
12. Linn, J. G. and N. P. Martin, 1999. Forage quality tests and interpretations. University of Minnesota Extension service, Food and Environmental science. Available at: http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/livestocksystems/DI2637.html
13. Polat, T., B. Bukun and M. Okant, 2007. Dose response effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on forage quality, yield and economic return of rangelands. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(3): 807-816.
14. Rayburn, E. B., 1991. Forage quality of intensive rotationally grazed pastures in the Northeast, 1988 to 1990. 92 p. Seneca Trail RC&D, 2 Park Square, Franklinville NY. Northeastern Dairy Farm Forage Demonstration Project.
15. Tui{dotless}k, 2009. Agriculture. Turkish Statistical Institute. www.tuik.gov.tr.
16. Turk, M., N. Celik, G. Bayram and E. Budakli, 2007a. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on yield and nutritional quality of rangeland. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 19(3):2341-2348.
17. Turk, M., N. Celik, G. Bayram and E. Budakli, 2007b. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on botanical composition, yield and quality of rangelands. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 19(7):5351-5359.
18. Undersander D., 2007. New developments in farage testing. Idaho Alfalfa and Forage Conference 26-27 February 2007, Twin Falls, ID, University of Idaho Cooperative Extension. pp. 24-34.
19. Zaffaroni, E. and P. J. Schneiter, 1989. Water-use efficiency and light interception of semi-dwarf and standard-height sunflower hybrids grown in different row arrangements. Agronomy Journal, 81:831-836.