A forgotten migrated intrauterine contraceptive device is not always innocent: A case report

Case Reports in Medicine

Volumn 2010, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Brar, Ranjeet ^a   Doddi, Sudeendra ^a   Ramasamy, Anand ^a   Sinha, Prakash ^a  

^a Princess Royal University Hospital   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857002318     PISSN: 16879627     EISSN: 16879635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2010/740642     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. "Manufacturer halts Saf-T-Coil production," Contraceptive Technology Update, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 109-110, 1982.
2. R. Richter, "Ein Mittel zur Veehuntung der Konzeption," Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 35, p. 1525, 1909.
3. G. P. Gentile and A. M. Siegler, "The misplaced or missing IUD," Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 627-641, 1977.
4. D. Antonelli and J. F. Kustrup Jr., "Large bowel obstruction due to intrauterine device: associated pelvic inflammatory disease," American Surgeon, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1165-1166, 1999.
5. D. K. Biyani, H. Denley, J. Hill, and A. J. M. Watson, "IUCD induced abdomino-pelvic actinomycosis presenting as acute large bowel obstruction," Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 870-871, 2007.
6. R. S. Ledward, C. Healey, and R. Eadie, "Removal of extrauterine Saf-T-Coil through laparoscope," British Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 798, p. 508, 1972.
7. D. Zakin, W. Z. Stern, and R. Rosenblatt, "Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications,