Biomedical research platforms and their influence on article submissions and journal rankings: An update;Biomedicinske istraživačke platforme i njihov odnos s brojem zaprimljenih članaka i vrednovanje kvalitete časopisa

Biochemia Medica

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-14

  Lippi, Giuseppe ^a   Favaloro, Emmanuel J ^b   Simundic, Ana Maria ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Impact factor; Indexing; Medline

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; WEB BROWSER;

BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

SCOPUS;

EID: 84856998946     PISSN: 13300962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (32)

1. Simundic AM. Biochemia Medica indexed in EMBASE/ Excerpta Medica and Scopus. Biochem Med 2006;16:91-2.
2. Simundic AM, Topic E, Cvoriscec D. Biochemia Medica indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded and Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition citation databases. Biochem Med 2008;18:141-2.
3. Simundic AM, Topic E, Cvoriscec D. Biochemia Medica launches a new web page and an online manuscript submission system. Biochem Med 2010;20:125.
4. Simundic AM, Miler M, Nikolac N, Cvoriscec D, Topic E. Biochemia Medica celebrates its first impact factor. Biochem Med 2010;20:277.
5. Plebani M. Thank you, indeed! Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49: 1759-60.
6. Lippi G, Plebani M. Laboratory applications for smartphones: risk or opportunity? Clin Biochem 2011;44:273-4.
7. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science. Science 1955;122: 108-11.
8. Favaloro EJ. Measuring the Quality of Journals and Journal Articles: The Impact Factor Tells but a Portion of the Story. Semin Thromb Hemost 2008;34:7-25.
9. Favaloro EJ. The Journal Impact Factor: don't expect its demise any time soon. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1319-24.
10. Favaloro EJ. Editorial. Winners of the 2010 Eberhard F. Mammen Award for Most Popular Article during 2008-2009. Semin Thromb Hemost 2010;36:685-92.
11. Favaloro EJ. Seminars in thrombosis & hemostasis 2010: Impact Factor and highest-cited articles from 2008 to 2009. Semin Thromb Hemost 2011;37:863-8.
12. Diamandis EP. Journal Impact Factor: it will go away soon. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1317-8.
13. Falagas ME, Alexiou VG. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2008; 56:223-6.
14. Zima T. Impact factor and evaluation of scientific papers or teams. Biochem Med 2008;18:5-6.
15. Lippi G. The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1585-6.
16. Markus T. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus or Google Scholar-Which is the best search engine for an effective literature research in laser medicine? Med Laser Appl 2001;26: 139-44.
17. Anders ME, Evans DP. Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches. Respir Care 2010;55:578-83.
18. Freeman MK, Lauderdale SA, Kendrach MG, Woolley TW. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:478-84.
19. Citrome L. Impact factor? Shmimpact factor!: the journal impact factor, modern day literature searching, and the publication process. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2007;4:54-7.
20. Fu LD, Aliferis C. Models for predicting and explaining citation count of biomedical articles. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008;6:222-6.
21. Harnad S. The self-archiving initiative. Nature 2001;410: 1024-5.
22. Curti M, Pistotti V, Gabutti G, Klersy C. Impact factor and electronic versions of biomedical scientific journals. Haematologica 2001;86:1015-20.
23. Mueller PS, Murali NS, Cha SS, Erwin PJ, Ghosh AK. The effect of online status on the impact factors of general internal medicine journals. Neth J Med 2006;64:39-44.
24. Murali NS, Murali HR, Auethavekiat P, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN, Manek NJ, Ghosh AK. Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:1001-6.
25. Alonso WJ, Fernández-Juricic E. Regional network raises profile of local journals. Nature 2002;415:471-2.
26. Mueller PS, Murali NS, Cha SS, Erwin PF, Ghosh AK. The association between impact factors and language of general internal medicine journals. Swiss Med Wkly 2006;136:441-3.
27. Van Dalen H, Henkens K. Signals in science: on the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics 2005;64:209-33.
28. Blank D, Buchweitz C, Procianoy RS. Impact of SciELO and MEDLINE indexing on submissions to Jornal de Pediatria. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2005;81:431-4.
29. Kovacic N, Misak A. What can be learned from impact factor of Croatian Medical Journal, 1994-2003? Croat Med J 2004;45:13-7.
30. Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT. Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2006;39:436-43.
31. Hightower C, Caldwell C. Shifting sands: science researchers on Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, with implications for library collections budgets. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 2010; 63. Available at: http://www.istl. org/10-fall/refereed3.html. Accessed January 9, 2012.
32. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008;22:338-42.