Distressed and dumped: Market dynamics of low-value, foreclosed properties during the advent of the federal neighborhood stabilization program

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 48-61

  Immergluck, Dan ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

foreclosures; mortgages; neighborhood stabilization; vacant properties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856995654     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X11423263     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Armour S.2010. Investors with cash are buying houses. USA Today, March22. http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2010-03-22-homeinvestors22_ST_N.htm (accessed April 2, 2011).
2. Bradford C.Financing homeownership: The federal role in neighborhood decline.Urban Affairs Review. 1979;14:313-35.
3. Bratt, R. 2011. Homeownership risk and responsibility before and after the U.S. mortgage crisis. In Beyond home ownership, ed. R. Ronald and M. Elsinga. London: Routledge.
4. Business and Professional People for the Public Interest. 2010. How can municipalities confront the vacant property challenge?Chicago: Business and Professional People for the Public Interest. http://www.bpichicago.org/documents/HowCanMunicipalitiesConfronttheVacantPropertyChallenge_AnIntroductoryGuide-1.pdf (accessed November 10, 2010).
5. Clauretie T.Estimating the house foreclosure discount corrected for spatial price interdependence and endogeneity of marketing time.Real Estate Economics. 2009;37:43-67.
6. CoultonC.SchrammM.HirschA.2008. Beyond REO: Property transfers at extremely distressed prices in Cuyahoga County, 2005-2008. Cleveland, OH: Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development, Case Western University. http://blog.case.edu/msass/2008/12/09/20081209_beyond_reo_final.pdf (accessed January 2, 2010).
7. Cutts, A. C., and W. Merrill. 2008. Interventions in mortgage default: Policies and practices to prevent home loss and lower costs. In Borrowing to live: Consumer and mortgage credit revisited, ed. N. Retsinas and E. Belsky. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8. Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation. 2009. Land bank reaches agreement with Fannie Mae for property acquisition, demolition assistance. Cleveland: Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation. December16. http://www.cuyahogalandbank.org/articles/20091216_fannie_mae_agreement.php (accessed October 20, 2010).
9. DudaM.ApgarW.2005. Collateral damage: The municipal impact of today's mortgage foreclosure boom. Minneapolis: Homeownership Preservation Foundation. May 11. http://www.nw.org/Network/neighborworksProgs/foreclosuresolutions/pdf_docs/Apgar-DudaStudyFinal.pdf (accessed October 22, 2010).
10. Engel K.,McCoy P.The subprime virus: Reckless credit, regulatory failure, and next steps. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
11. Neighborhood Stabilization Program: HUD and grantees are taking actions to ensure program compliance but data on program outputs could be improved. 2010;.
12. Greenstein R.,Sungu-Eryilmaz Y.Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2004.
13. Harding J.,Rosenblatt E.,Yao V.The contagion effect of foreclosed properties.Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;66:164-78.
14. Hollander J.Sunburnt cities: The great recession, depopulation and urban planning in the American sunbelt. London: Routledge; 2011.
15. Immergluck D.The accumulation of lender-owned homes during the U.S. mortgage crisis: Examining metropolitan REO inventories.Housing Policy Debate. 2010;20:619-45.
16. Immergluck D.,Smith G.The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values.Housing Policy Debate. 2006a;17 (1): 57-80.
17. Immergluck D.,Smith G.The impact of single family mortgage foreclosures on crime.Housing Studies. 2006b;21 (6): 851-66.
18. LeonardJ.MallachA.2010. Restoring properties, rebuilding communities: Transforming vacant properties in today's America. Washington, DC: Center for Community Progress. http://www.communityprogress.net/filebin/pdf/RestoringProperties_Final.pdf (accessed October 24, 2010).
19. Lind M.A new way to value REO.Mortgage Banking. 2010;:64.
20. Mallach A.Bringing buildings back: From abandoned properties to community assets. Montclair, NJ: National Housing Institute; 2006.
21. Mallach, A. 2010. NSP properties, housing markets, and the shadow inventory. In REO and vacant properties: Strategies for neighborhood stabilization, ed. P. Chakrabarti, M. Lambert, and M. Petrus, 13-22. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and Cleveland and the Federal Reserve Board.
22. Mallach A.Meeting the challenge of distressed property investors in America's neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Local Initiatives Support Corporation; 2011.
23. MarcusMillichap. 2011. 2011 annual rental market report, p. 10. http://www.marcusmillichap.com/research/reports/Apartment/Atlanta_NAR11.pdf (accessed April 2, 2011).
24. National Community Stabilization Trust. 2011. Property transfer executions. http://www.stabilizationtrust.com/programs_services/property_acquisition/executions/ (accessed April 11, 2011).
25. Pennington-Cross A.The value of foreclosed properties.Journal of Real Estate Research. 2006;28:193-214.
26. Reid, C. 2010. Shuttered subdivisions: REOs and the challenges of neighborhood stabilization in suburban cities. In REO and vacant properties: Strategies for neighborhood stabilization, ed. P. Chakrabarti, M. Lambert, and M. Petrus, 23-32. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and Cleveland and the Federal Reserve Board.
27. Rephann T.Rental housing and crime: The role of property ownership and management.Annals of Regional Science. 2009;43:435-51.
28. Rogers W.Declining foreclosure neighborhood effects over time.Housing Policy Debate. 2010;20:687-706.
29. Rohe W.,Stewart L.Homeownership and neighborhood stability.Housing Policy Debate. 1996;7:37-81.
30. Schuetz J.,Been V.,Ellen I.G.Neighborhood effects of concentrated mortgage foreclosures.Journal of Housing Economics. 2008;17 (4): 306-19.
31. SmithG.DudaS.2009. Roadblock to recovery: Examining the disparate impact of vacant, lender-owned properties in Chicago. http://www.woodstockinst.org/publications/download/roadblock-to-recovery%3a-examining-the-disparate-impact-of-vacant-lender%11owned-properties-in-chicago/ (accessed January 2, 2010).
32. Theologides, S. 2010. Servicing REO properties: The servicer's role and incentives. In REO and vacant properties: Strategies for neighborhood stabilization, ed. P. Chakrabarti, M. Lambert, and M. Petrus, 77-88. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and Cleveland and the Federal Reserve Board.
33. Treuhaft S.,Rose K.,Black K.When investors buy up the neighborhood: Preventing investor ownership from causing neighborhood decline. Washington, DC: Policy Link; 2010.
34. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2010. HUD secretary announces national first look program to help communities stabilize neighborhoods hard-hit by foreclosure. http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2010/HUDNo.10-187 (accessed October 23, 2010).
35. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2011. Summary of the "Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008."http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/about/conplan/foreclosure/pdf/housingeconrecovactsum.pdf (accessed September 14, 2011).