Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: Epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Olesen, Sarah C ^a   Butterworth, Peter ^a   Jacomb, Patricia ^a   Tait, Robert J ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD ABUSE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; ADULT SURVIVORS OF CHILD ABUSE; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEW SOUTH WALES; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 84856980912     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-34     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Arbyn M, Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, Ferlay J, Ann Oncol 2011 22 12 2675 2686 10.1093/annonc/mdr015 21471563
2. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE, Lancet 2004 364 249 256 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16674-9 15262102 (Pubitemid 38942814)
3. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E, BMJ 1999 318 904 908 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904 10102852 (Pubitemid 29191925)
4. Cervical screening in Australia 2006-2007. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cancer Series no 47 Cat no CAN 43 Canberra: AIHW 2009
5. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, College Statement C-Gyn 5: Screening for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer Melbourne: RANZCOG 2010 http://www.ranzcog.edu.au
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Women's Health 2008. Prevalence and Trend Data Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 2009 22338646
7. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, NHS Cervical Screening Programme: Annual Review 2009 Sheffield: National Health Service 2009 http://www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk
8. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V, BMJ 2009 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2025
9. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. Waller J, Bartoszek M, Marlow L, Wardle J, J Med Screen 2009 16 199 204 10.1258/jms.2009.009073 20054095
10. Recent pap tests among Canadian women: is depression a barrier to cervical cancer screening- Kaida A, Colman I, Janssen PA, J Women's Health 2008 17 1175 1181 10.1089/jwh.2007.0626 22337910
11. Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. Women aged 25-64: Data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Nelson W, Moser RP, Gaffey A, Waldron W, J Women's Health 2009 18 1759 1768 10.1089/jwh.2009.1430 22337910
12. Why many visible minority women in Canada do not participate in cervical cancer screening. Amankwah E, Ngwakongnwi E, Quan H, Ethn Health 2009 14 337 349 10.1080/13557850802699122 19280443
13. Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives-Findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2000-2006. Steele CB, Cardinez CJ, Richardson LC, Tom-Orme L, Shaw KM, Cancer 2008 113 1131 1141 10.1002/cncr.23727 18720374
14. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and Non-Latina Whites. Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gammon MD, Am J Public Health 2004 94 1393 1398 10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1393 15284049 (Pubitemid 39006815)
15. Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain. Sutton S, Rutherford C, Social Sci Med 2005 61 2460 2465 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.017 (Pubitemid 41446249)
16. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: The case of cervical screening in Britain. Sabates R, Feinstein L, Social Sci Med 2006 62 2998 3010 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.032
17. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000-2002. Coughlin SS, King J, Richards TB, Ekwueme DU, Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2006 15 2154 2159 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0914 (Pubitemid 44877040)
18. The accuracy of Pap smear utilization self-report: a methodological consideration in cervical screening research. Bowman JA, Redman S, Dickinson JA, Gibberd R, Sanson-Fisher RW, Health Serv Res 1991 26 97 107 2016170
19. An investigation of the effects of social desirability on the validity of self-reports of cancer screening behaviors. Johnson T, O'Rourke D, Burris J, Warnecke RB, Med Care 2005 43 565 573 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163648.26493.70 15908851 (Pubitemid 40847293)
20. The accuracy of self-reported Pap smear utilisation. Bowman JA, Sanson-Fisher R, Redman S, Soc Sci Med 1997 44 969 976 10.1016/S0277-9536(96) 00222-5 9089918 (Pubitemid 27129932)
21. A source of error in self-reports of pap test utilization. Pizarro J, Schneider TR, Salovey P, J Community Health 2002 27 351 356 10.1023/A: 1019888627113 12238733 (Pubitemid 38481342)
22. Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population. Caplan LS, McQueen DV, Qualters JR, Leff M, Garrett C, Calonge N, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1182 1187 14652278 (Pubitemid 37499441)
23. Analysis of 13 million individual patient records pertaining to Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies and surgery on the uterine cervix (Belgium, 1996-2000). Arbyn M, Simoens C, Van Oyen H, Foidart J-M, Goffin F, Simon P, Fabri V, Preventive Med 2009 48 438 443 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.021
24. Cervical cancer screening in the Flemish region (Belgium): measurement of the attendance rate by telephone interview. Arbyn M, Quataert P, Hal G, Oyen HV, Eur J Cancer Prev 1997 6 389 398 10.1097/00008469-199708000-00012 9370103 (Pubitemid 27492125)
25. Inconsistent self-reported mammography history: findings from the national population health survey longitudinal cohort. Bancej CM, Maxwell CJ, Snider J, BMC Health Serv Res 2004 4 32 10.1186/1472-6963-4-32 15541176 (Pubitemid 40117631)
26. Disparities in preventive procedures: comparisons of self-report and Medicare claims data. Fiscella K, Holt K, Meldrum S, Franks P, BMC Health Serv Res 2006 6 122 10.1186/1472-6963-6-122 17010195 (Pubitemid 44546450)
27. Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy. Bhandari A, Wagner T, Med Care Res Rev 2006 63 217 235 10.1177/1077558705285298 16595412 (Pubitemid 43344151)
28. Psychosocial predictors of adherence to risk-appropriate cervical cancer screening guidelines: a cross sectional study of women in Ohio Appalachia participating in the Community Awareness Resources and Education (CARE) project. Paskett ED, McLaughlin JM, Reiter PL, Lehman AM, Rhoda DA, Katz ML, Hade EM, Post DM, Ruffin MT, Prev Med 2010 50 74 80 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.001 19744509
29. Use of medical services after participation in a community-based epidemiological health survey. Parslow RA, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004 39 311 317 10.1007/s00127-004-0747-3 15085334 (Pubitemid 39369145)
30. Incidence of self-reported brain injury and the relationship with substance abuse: findings from a longitudinal community survey. Tait RJ, Anstey KJ, Butterworth P, BMC Pub Health 2010 10 171 10.1186/1471-2458-10-171
31. Household income, living standards and financial stress. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Year Book Australia 2002, Cat no 13010 Canberra: ABS, Trewin D, 2002
32. Financial hardship, socio-economic position and depression: Results from the PATH Through Life Survey. Butterworth P, Rodgers B, Windsor TD, Soc Sci Med 2009 69 229 237 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.008 19501441
33. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M, Addiction 1993 88 791 804 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x 8329970 (Pubitemid 23194530)
34. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Alcohol Guidelines: Health Risks and Benefits Canberra: NHMRC 2001
35. Behavioural and biological correlates of physical functioning in middle aged office workers: the UK Whitehall II study. Stafford M, Hemingway H, Stansfeld SA, Brunner E, Marmot M, J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 52 353 358 10.1136/jech.52.6.353 9764255 (Pubitemid 28438519)
36. A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Eysenck S, Eysenck H, Barrett P, Pers Individ Dif 1985 6 21 29 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
37. The stress process. Pearlin L, Lieberman M, Menaghan E, Mullan J, J Health Soc Behav 1981 22 337 356 10.2307/2136676 7320473
38. Hays RD, RAND-36 Health Status Inventory San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation 1998
39. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S, Med Care 1996 34 220 233 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 8628042 (Pubitemid 126433231)
40. Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D, BMJ 1988 297 897 899 10.1136/bmj.297. 6653.897 3140969
41. Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Baker DW, Med Care 2002 40 395 404 10.1097/00005650-200205000-00005 11961474
42. Calculating sample weights for the PATH Through Life survey. Butterworth P, Olesen S, Leach L, Jacomb T, Psychiatric Epidemiology and Social Issues Working Paper Series 2010 01 1 11 http://cmhr/working-paper.php
43. Estimating the Population Attributable Risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, Brinton LA, Schairer C, Am J Epidemiol 1985 122 904 914 4050778 (Pubitemid 16207356)
44. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J, Br J Cancer 2003 89 88 93 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974 12838306 (Pubitemid 36897941)
45. Equity in prevention and health care. Lorant V, Boland B, Humblet P, Deliège D, J Epidemiol Community Health 2002 56 510 516 10.1136/jech.56.7.510 12080158 (Pubitemid 34712947)
46. Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines. Aldrich R, Kemp L, Williams JS, Harris E, Simpson S, Wilson A, McGill K, Byles J, Lowe J, Jackson T, BMJ 2003 327 1283 1285 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1283 14644976 (Pubitemid 37487289)
47. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Burns C, Oliver D, Thapar A, Mead N, Safran DG, Roland MO, BMJ 2001 323 784 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.784 11588082
48. Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening- Farley M, Golding JM, Minkoff JR, J Fam Pract 2002 51 827 831 12401150
49. Effect of childhood sexual abuse on gynecological care as an adult. Leeners B, Stiller R, Block E, Gorres G, Imthurn B, Rath W, Psychosomatics 2002 48 385 393
50. Association of sexual abuse with incident high-risk human papillomavirus infection among young African-American women. Wingood GM, Seth P, DiClemente RJ, Robinson LS, Sex Transm Dis 2009 36 784 786 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b3567e 19704392
51. Gender differences in factors affecting use of health services: an analysis of a community study of middle-aged and older Australians. Parslow R, Jorm A, Christensen H, Jacomb P, Rodgers B, Soc Sci Med 2004 59 2121 2129 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.018 15351477 (Pubitemid 39200634)
52. Gender, psychosocial factors and the use of medical services: a longitudinal analysis. Green CA, Pope CR, Social Sci Med 1999 48 1363 1372 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00440-7 (Pubitemid 29197338)
53. Prospective seroepidemiologic study of human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer. Dillner J, Lehtinen M, Bjorge T, Luostarinen T, Youngman L, Jellum E, Koskela P, Gislefoss RE, Hallmans G, Paavonen J, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997 89 1293 1299 10.1093/jnci/89.17.1293 9293920 (Pubitemid 27371950)