Pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments: Do they facilitate or hinder learning?

Proc. Int. Conf. on Computers in Education 2005: "Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences"- Sharing Research Results and Exemplary Innovations, ICCE

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 650-653

  Domagk, Steffi ^a   Niegemann, Helmut M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; INITIAL STAGES; LEARNING OUTCOME; LEARNING PROCESS; LIFE-LIKE CHARACTERS; MULTIMEDIA LEARNING; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84856971536     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. André, E., Rist, T., & Müller, J. (1999). Employing AI methods to control the behavior of animated interface agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 415-448.
2. Atkinson, J. W. (1974). Motivational determinants of intellective performance and cumulative achievement. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 389-410). Washington, DC: Winston.
3. Bendel, O. (2004). Merkmale, Ziele und Funktionen pädagogischer Agenten. Paper presented at the 9. InternationalenSymposiums fur Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2004), Chur, 6.-8. Oktober 2004.
4. Bente, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2001). Psychologische Aspekte bei der Implementierung und Evaluation nonverbal agierender Interface-Agenten. Retrieved 07.10., 2003, from http://www.embassi.de/publi/veroeffent/ phhINP045KHM01.pdf
5. Bloom, B. S. (1973). Individuelle Unterschiede in der Schulleistung: ein überholtes Problem? In W. Edelstein & D. Hopf (Eds.), Bedingungen des Bildungsprozesses (pp. 251-284). Stuttgart: Klett.
6. Bradshaw, J. M. (1997). Software Agents. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press / The MIT Press.
7. Brennan, S. (1990). Conversation as direct manipulation: An Iconoclastic View. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design (pp. 393-404). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
8. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
9. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. L., & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 267-286.
10. Heller, K. (Ed.). (1991). Begabungsdiagnostik in der Schul- und Erziehungsberatung. Bern: Huber.
11. Helmke, A., & Weinert, F. E. (1997). Bedingungsfaktoren schulischer Leistungen. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule (Vol. Bd. 3, pp. 71-176). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
12. Johnson, W. J., Shaw, E., & Ganeshan, R. (1998). Pedagogical Agents on the Web. Retrieved 23.10., 2003, from http://www.isi.edu/isd/ADE/papers/ its98/ITS98-WW.htm
13. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J., Stiles, R., & Munro, A. (1998). Integrating Pedagogical Agents into Virtual Environments. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(6), 523-546. (Pubitemid 128342320)
14. Laurel, B. (1990). Interface agents: Metaphors with character. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The Art of Human- Computer Interface Design (pp. 355-365). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
15. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. R., Barlow, S. T., & Stone, B. A. (1997). The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. Paper presented at the CHI '97, New York.
16. Moreno, R. (2003). Animated Pedagogical Agents: How do they help students construct knowledge from Interactive Multimedia Environments?Unpublished manuscript.
17. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Life-Like Pedagogical Agents in Constructivist Multimedia Environments: Cognitive Consequences of their Interaction. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2000), Montreal, Canada.
18. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001a). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 47(2), 57-66. (Pubitemid 33686677)
19. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001b). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen (Langversion, 2001). Retrieved 30.10., 2003, from http://www.psych.uni-potsdam. de/people/rheinberg/messverfahren/FAMLangfassung.pdf
20. Thórisson, K. R. (1996). Communicative humanoids. A computational model of psychosocial dialogue skills. PHD-Thesis: MIT.