Learning designs and learning objects: Where pedagogy meets technology

Proc. Int. Conf. on Computers in Education 2005: "Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences"- Sharing Research Results and Exemplary Innovations, ICCE

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 328-335

  Oliver, Ron ^a   Wirski, Ralph ^b   Wait, Lisa ^b   Blanksby, Vivienne ^b  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b E Works ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT PACKAGE; DIGITAL REPOSITORY; LEARNING DESIGNS; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; LEARNING OBJECTS; ONLINE LEARNING; ONLINE RESOURCES; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; QUALITY LEARNING;

DESIGN; EDUCATION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84856959957     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. IEEE LTSC, (2005). Learning Object Metadata Standard. Retrieved Aug 26 2005, from http://ieeeltsc.org/wg12LOM/lomDescription
2. Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version. Retrieved 15 May, 2003, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc
3. Rehak, D. & Mason, R. (2003). In A. Littlejohn (Ed.) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning. London: Kogan Page.
4. Laurillard, D. (2002). Can technical standards unlock the pedagogical innovations needed for elearning? Retrieved May 15 2003 from http://www.imsglobal.org/otf/dl02SeptSheffield.pdf
5. Lasseter, M. & Rogers, M. (2004). Creating Flexible E-Learning Through the Use of Learning Objects. Educause Quarterly, 27(4) 72-74.
6. Jonassen, D., & Churchill, D. (2004). Is There a Learning Orientation in Learning Objects?. International Journal on E-Learning 3(2), 32-41.
7. Bradley, C., & Boyle, T. (2004). The Design, Development, and Use of Multimedia Learning Objects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13(4), 371-389.
8. Jonassen, M. & Land, S. (2000). Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Oliver, R. & Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Wills, S., & Agostinho, S. (2002). Exploring strategies to formalise the description of learning designs. In J. Herrington (Eds.) Proceedings of HERDSA. Joondalup: Edith Cowan University.
10. Koppi, A. & Hodgson, L. & Bayly, J. (2000). The often missing but essential component for online learning: A learning resource catalogue. In (Bordeaux & Heller Eds.) Proceedings of Ed-Media International Conference, (pp502-506). Charlottesville: AACE.
11. MERLOT (2000). Multimedia Education Resource for Learning and Online Teaching. Retrieved 14 April 2003 from http://www.merlot.org
12. Oliver, R. & Blanksby, V. (2003). Online learning designs in the training sector. In G.Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (Eds.) Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of ASCILITE (pp 364-374). Adelaide, ASCILITE.
13. Oliver, R., Towers, S. & Pearl, N. (2000). The ANTA Flexible Toolbox Project: Developing Sustainable and Scalable On-Line Learning Materials for Vocational Education and Training. In J. Bordeau & S. Heller (Eds.) Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. (pp 820-826). Virginia: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
14. Wirski, R., Brownfield, G. & Oliver, R. Exploring SCORM and the National Flexible Learning Toolboxes. In (R. Atkinson & R.Phillips Eds.) Proceedings of ASCILITE 2004. (pp938-947). Murdoch University, ASCILITE.
15. Kraan, W, and Wilson, S.,(2002), "Dan Rehak: "SCORM is not for everyone"", CETIS Discussion Article, CETIS, Retrieved January 15 2003, from: http://www.cetis.ac.uk/content/20021002000737