Aspects of identification and position in intertextual reference in PhD theses

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 19, Issue , 2005, Pages 31-50

  Thompson, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856951011     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.19.04tho     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bunton, D. (1998). Linguistic and textual problems in PhD and MPhil theses: An analysis of genre moves and metatext. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong.
2. Groom, N. (2000). Attribution and averral revisited: Three perspectives on manifest intertextuality in academic writing. In Thompson (Ed.), 15-26.
3. Hill, S., Soppelsa, B., & West, G. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 333-347.
4. Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 176-207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20 (3), 341-367.
6. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.
7. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 1-35.
8. Ridley, D. (2000). The different guises of a PhD thesis and the role of a literature review. In Thompson (Ed.), 61-76.
9. Shaw, P. (1992). Reasons for the correlation of voice, tense, and sentence function in reporting verbs. Applied Linguistics, 13 (3), 302-319.
10. Sinclair, J. (1988). Mirror for a text. Journal of English and Foreign Languages (Hyderabad, India), 1.
11. Swales, J. (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1), 39-56.
12. Tadros, A. (1993). The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, Description, Discourse. London: HarperCollins.
13. Thomas, S. & Hawes, T. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 129-148.
14. Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12 (4), 365-382.
15. Thompson, P. (1999). Exploring the contexts of writing: Interviews with PhD supervisors. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in EAP writing research and instruction (pp. 37-54). Reading, UK: CALS, The University of Reading.
16. Thompson, P. (2000). Citation practices in PhD theses. In L. Burnard & T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (pp. 91-102). (Lodz Studies in Language.) Hamburg: Peter Lang.
17. Thompson, P. (Ed.). (2000). Patterns and Perspectives: Insights for EAP Writing Practice. Reading, UK: CALS, The University of Reading.
18. Thompson, P. (2001). A pedagogically-motivated corpus-based examination of PhD theses: Macrostructure, citation practices and uses of modal verbs. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Reading.
19. Thompson, P. (2002). Modal verbs in academic writing. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis (pp. 305-324). Amsterdam: Rodopi.