Comprehensive computational support for collaborative learning from writing

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education: Enhancing and Sustaining New Knowledge Through the Use of Digital Technology in Education, ICCE 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 129-136

  Reimann, Peter ^a   Calvo, Rafael ^a   Yacef, Kalina ^b   Southavilay, Vilaythong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

CSCL; Formative feedback; Process mining; Text mining; Writing

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE WRITING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CSCL; DOCUMENT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT; HIGHER EDUCATION; PROCESS MINING; SOFTWARE SUPPORT; SUBJECT MATTERS; TEAM WRITING; TEXT MINING; TOOL DEVELOPMENT; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING COURSE;

DATA MINING; MINING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS; TECHNICAL WRITING; WORD PROCESSING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84856909699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia, The psychology of written composition. 1987, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
2. Galbraith, D., Writing as a knowledge-constituting process, in Knowing what to write: conceptual processes in text production, T. Torrance and D. Galbraith, Editors. 1999, Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam. p. 139-150.
3. Lowry, P.B., A. Curtis, and M.R. Lowry, Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 2004. 41(1): p. 66-99.
4. Scardamalia, M. and C. Bereiter, Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology, in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, R.K. Sawyer, Editor. 2006, Cambride University Press: New York. p. 97-115.
5. Amalesvoort van, M., J. Andriessen, and G. Kanselaar, Representational tools in computer-supported colloborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2007. 16(4): p. 485-521.
6. Stern, S., Producing Sites, Exploring Identities: Youth Online Authorship, in Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, D. Buckingham, Editor. 2008, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 95-117.
7. Calvo, R.A., et al., Collaborative writing support tools on the cloud. manuscript under review.
8. Villalon, J., et al., Glosser: Enhanced feedback for student writing tasks, in 8th IEEE International Conference on Advance Learning Technologies (ICALT) (Santadar, Spain, July 1-5, 2008; accepted March 2008). 2008: Santadar, Spain.
9. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d., et al., PROM4.0: Comprehensive support for real process analysis, in Petri nets and other models of concurrency (Proceedings 28th International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency, ICATPN 2007, Siedcle, Poland, June 25-29, 2007), J. Kleijn and A. Yakovlev, Editors. 2007, Springer: Berlin. p. 484-494.
10. Reimann, P., J. Frerejean, and K. Thompson, Using process mining to identify models of group decision making processes in chat data, in Computer-supported collaborative learning practives: CSCL2009 conference proceedings, C. O'Malley, et al., Editors. 2009, International Society for the Learning Sciences: Rhodes, Greece. p. 98-107.
11. Southavilay, V., K. Yacef, and R.A. Calvo, WriteProc: A framework for exploring collabortive writing processes, in Australian Document Computing Symposium. 2009: Sydney, Australia.
12. Villalon, J. and R.A. Calvo, Single document semantic spaces, in The Australian Data Mining Conference. 2009.
13. Southavilay, V., K. Yacef, and R.A. Calvo, Process mining to support students' collaborative writing, in Educational Data Mining Conference. 2010: Pittsburgh, PA.
14. Reimann, P., Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 2009. 4: p. 239-257.