Pain measurement: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) in clinical trials with OTC analgesics in headache

Cephalalgia

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 185-197

  Aicher, B ^a   Peil, H ^a   Peil, B ^b   Diener, H C ^c  

^a BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH AND CO KG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical endpoint; cut off point; headache; migraine; OTC analgesics; ROC curve analysis; tension type headache; verbal rating scale (VRS); visual analogue scale (VAS)

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CAFFEINE; NON PRESCRIPTION DRUG; PARACETAMOL; PLACEBO;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOTHERAPY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VERBAL RATING SCALE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84856869981     PISSN: 03331024     EISSN: 14682982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/03331024111430856     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Melzack R, Katz J Wall and Melzack's Textbook of Pain. 5 th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2006; 291-304. McMahon SB Klotzenburg M, ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier ; 2006: 291-304.
2. Peters ML, Patijn J, Lamé I. Pain assessment in younger and older pain patients: psychometric properties and patient preference of five commonly used measures of pain intensity. Pain Med. 2007 ; 7: 601-610 (Pubitemid 47490215)
3. Jensen MP, Chenc C, Brugger AM. Postsurgical pain outcome assessment. Pain. 2002 ; 99: 101-109 (Pubitemid 35247534)
4. Jensen MP, Karoly P Handbook of pain assessment. 2 nd edn. New York: Guilford Press, 2001; 15-34. Turk DC Melzack R, ed. New York: Guilford Press ; 2001: 15-34.
5. Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain. Pain. 1989 ; 37: 295-303 (Pubitemid 19149089)
6. Kwong WJ, Pathak DS. Validation of the eleven-point pain scale in the measurement of migraine headache pain. Cephalalgia. 2007 ; 27: 336-342 (Pubitemid 46434957)
7. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C, Diener HC, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine. 2nd ed. Cephalalgia. 2000 ; 20: 765-786 (Pubitemid 32154559)
8. Bendtsen L, Bigal ME, Cerbo R, Diener HC, Holroyd K, Lampl C, et al. on behalf of the International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee: Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in tension-type headache. 2nd ed. Cephalalgia. 2009 ; 30: 1-16
9. Lines CR, Vandormael K, Malbecq W. Comparison of visual analog scale and categorical ratings of headache pain in a randomized controlled clinical trial with migraine patients. Pain. 2001 ; 93: 185-190 (Pubitemid 32568404)
10. Pilgrim AJ. Early-phase clinical trials in migraine: efficacy, safety and dose-finding. Cephalalgia. 1995 ; ((Suppl 15)). 10-13
11. Diener HC, Pfaffenrath V, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is more effective than single substances and dual combination for the treatment of headache: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia. 2005 ; 25: 776-787 (Pubitemid 41368672)
12. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia. 1988 ; 8 (Suppl 7). 1-96
13. Pepe MS The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York: Oxford University Press ; 2003 :
14. McQuay HJ, Moore A Wall and Melzack's Textbook of Pain. 5 th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2006; 415-425. McMahon SB Klotzenburg M, ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier ; 2006: 415-425.
15. Bond M, Pilowsky I. Subjective assessment of pain and its relation to the administration of analgesics in cancer patients. J Psychosomatic Res. 1966 ; 10: 203-208
16. Ohnhaus E, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975 ; 1: 379-384
17. Lara-Munoz C, Ponce de Leon S, Feinstein AR, Puentee A, Wells CK. Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research. I. Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli. Arch Med Res. 2004 ; 35: 43-48 (Pubitemid 38249310)
18. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 ; 17: 45-56 (Pubitemid 13004473)
19. Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME. An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain. 1985 ; 21: 177-185 (Pubitemid 15129599)
20. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Euro Spine J. 2006 ; 15: S17 - S24 (Pubitemid 43188545)
21. Shealy CN, Shealy M-C Pain-New perspectives in therapy and research. Weisenberg M Tursky B, ed. New York: Plenum Press ; 1976: 21-33.
22. Langley GB, Sheppeared H. Problems associated with pain measurement in arthritis: comparison of the visual analogue and verbal rating scales. Clin Experiment Rheumatol. 1984 ; 2: 231-234 (Pubitemid 14016366)
23. Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990 ; 17: 1022-1024 (Pubitemid 20278017)
24. Dijkers M. Comparing quantification of pain severity by verbal rating and numeric rating scales. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010 ; 33: 232-242
25. Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L. The quantification of pain: an analysis of words used to describe pain and analgesia in clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982 ; 32: 143-148 (Pubitemid 13000951)
26. Pilgrim AJ. Methodology of clinical trials of sumatriptan in migraine and cluster headache. Eur Neurol. 1991 ; 31: 295-299
27. Tfelt-Hansen P Frontiers in headache research, vol. 6. Headache treatment: Trial Methodology and new drugs. Olesen J Tfelt-Hansen P, ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publ ; 1997: 111-117.
28. Diener HC, Peil H, Aicher B. The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is effective and safe in the treatment of severe headache attacks: results from a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia. 2011 ; 31: 1466-1476
29. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland CS. When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995 ; 61: 277-284
30. Finn RH. Effects of some variations in rating scale characteristics on the means and reliabilities of ratings. Educ Psychol Measurement. 1972 ; 34: 885-892
31. Ramsay JO. The effect of number of categories in rating scales on precision of estimation of scale values. Psychometrika. 1973 ; 38: 513-533
32. Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica. 2000 ; 104: 1-15
33. von Grafenried B, Nüesch E. Non-migrainous headache for the evaluation of oral analgesics. Br J Clin Pharmac. 1980 ; 10: 225S - 231S (Pubitemid 11214304)
34. Clark P, Lavielle P, Martinez . Learning from pain scales: patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003 ; 30: 1584-1588 (Pubitemid 36835461)
35. Kuball J, Schüz J, Gamm H, Weber M. Bone marrow punctures and pain. Acute Pain. 2004 ; 6: 9-14 (Pubitemid 38581253)
36. Kunz M, Mylius V, Scharmann S, Schepelman K, Lautenbacher S. Influence of dementia on multiple components of pain. Eur J Pain. 2009 ; 13: 317-325
37. Bland JM, Altman DG. Some examples of regression towards the mean. Br Med J. 1994 ; 309: 780-780
38. Guilford JP Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill ; 1954 :
39. Weber M, Schüz J, Kuball J, Gamm H, Jage J. Schmerzerfassung bei invasiven diagnostischen Prozeduren-Vergleich einer elfstufigen numerischen Rangskala mit einer sechsstufigen verbalen Kategorieskala zur Schmerzmessung bei Knochenmarkpunktion. Schmerz. 2005 ; 19: 513-520 (Pubitemid 41681220)
40. Schachtel BP, Thoden WR. Onset of action of ibuprofen in the treatment of muscle-contraction headache. Headache. 1988 ; 28: 471-474
41. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement?. Pain. 1994 ; 58: 387-392 (Pubitemid 24284081)
42. Breivik EK, Björnsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000 ; 16: 22-28 (Pubitemid 30155392)
43. Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Postsurgical pain outcome assessment. Pain. 2002 ; 99: 101-109 (Pubitemid 35247534)
44. Marqui L, Rico Duarte L, Marine C, Lauque D, Sorum PC. How patients and physicians rate patients' pain in a French emergency department using a verbally administered numerical rating scale and a visual analog scale. Acute Pain. 2008 ; 10: 31-37
45. Jage J Medikamente gegen Krebsschmerzen. 4. Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme ; 2003 :
46. Dundee JW. Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics. Br J Clin Pharmac. 1980 ; 10: 329S - 334S (Pubitemid 11214317)
47. Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain. 1981 ; 10: 241-248 (Pubitemid 11096921)
48. Glassman JM, Soyka JP, Pollack M. Treatment of muscle contraction headache: Micrainin vs. Aspirin. Headache. 1982 ; 22: 101-109 (Pubitemid 12105028)
49. Bolognese JA, Schnitzer TJ, Ehrich EW. Response relationship of VAS and Likert scales in osteoarthritis efficacy measurement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 ; 11: 499-507 (Pubitemid 36747870)
50. Serrie A La douleur en pratique quotidienne-Diagnostic et Traitements, 2e edition. Serrie A Thurel C, ed. Rueil-Malmaison: Iditions Arnette ; 2002: 62-84.
51. Chauffour-Ader C, Dayde M-C Comprendre et soulager la douleur. Rueil-Malmaison: Wolters Kluver ; 2008 :
52. Beloeil H, Negre I Mém douleur. Rueil-Malmaison: Groupe Liaisons Cedex ; 2007 :
53. Cabot I, Le May S, Besner G. Revue critique des outils d'évaluation de la douleur chez une clientèle adulte souffrant de cancer. Recherche en soins infirmiers. 2007 ; 90: 35-57
54. Caraceni A, Cherny N, Fainsinger R, Kaasa S, Poulain P, Radbruch L, De Conno F, and the Steering Committee of the EAPC research Network. Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an expert working group of the European Association of Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002; 23: 239-255. (Pubitemid 34219075)
55. Heft MW, Parker SR. An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain. 1984 ; 19: 153-161 (Pubitemid 14121276)
56. Wallenstein SL, Heidrich III G, Kaiko R, Houde RW. Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics: the measurement of clinical pain. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 ; 10: 319S - 327S (Pubitemid 11214316)
57. Linton SJ, Götestam KG. A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance. Pain. 1983 ; 17: 57-65 (Pubitemid 13004474)
58. Littman GS, Walker BR, Schneider BE. Reassessment of verbal and visual analog ratings in analgesic studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 ; 38: 16-23 (Pubitemid 15242193)
59. Collins SL, Moore A, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain. 1997 ; 72: 95-97 (Pubitemid 27321906)
60. Seymour RA, Kelly PJ, Hawesford JE. The efficacy of ketoprofen and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in postoperative pain after third molar surgery. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 ; 41: 581-585 (Pubitemid 26184680)
61. Stubhaug A, Grimstad J, Breivik H. Lack of analgesic effect of 50 and 100 mg oral tramadol after orthopaedic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo and standard active drug comparison. Pain. 1995 ; 62: 111-118
62. Curtis P, Gartman LA, Green DB. Utilization of ketorolac tromethamine for control of severe odontogenic pain. J Endod. 1994 ; 20: 457-459
63. Gursoy A, Ertugrul DT, Sahin M, Tutuncu NB, Demirer AN, Demirag NG. Needle-free delivery of lidocaine for reducing the pain associated with the fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: time-saving and efficacious procedure. Thyroid. 2007 ; 17: 317-321 (Pubitemid 46776135)
64. Page B, Paterson D, Young D, O'Dwyer PJ. Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain. Br J Surg. 2002 ; 89: 1315-1318 (Pubitemid 36002553)
65. Lampl C, Huber G, Haas S, Rittberger E, Diener HC. Difference in triptan effect in patients with migraine and early allodynia. Cephalalgia. 2008 ; 28: 1031-1038
66. Lundqvist C, Benth J, Grande RB, Aaseth K, Russell MB. A vertical VAS is a valid instrument for monitoring headache pain intensity. Cephalalgia. 2009 ; 29: 1034-1041
67. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 2nd edn. Cephalalgia. 2004 ; 24 (Suppl 1). 9-160
68. Briggs M, Closs JS. A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 ; 18: 438-446
69. Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 ; 4: 407-414 (Pubitemid 37122581)
70. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006 ; 163: 670-675
71. Schürks M, Kurth T, Knorn P, Pageler L, Diener H-C. Predictors of hazardous alcohol consumption among patients with cluster headache. Cephalalgia. 2006 ; 26: 623-627
72. Loos MJA, Houterman S, Scheltinga MRM, Roumen RMH. Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: visual analogue or verbal rating scale?. Hernia. 2008 ; 12: 147-151
73. Paul SM, Zelman DC, Smith M, Miaskowski C. Categorizing the severity of cancer pain: Further exploration of the establishment of cutpoints. Pain. 2005 ; 113: 37-44 (Pubitemid 40038444)
74. Palos GR, Mendoza TR, Mobley GM, Cantor SB, Cleeland CS. Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain. J Pain. 2006 ; 7: 49-56 (Pubitemid 43097263)
75. Dionne RA, Bartoshuk L, Mogil J, Witter J. Individual responder analyses for pain: does one pain scale fit all?. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005 ; 26: 125-130 (Pubitemid 40313591)
76. Dahlöf CGH, Rolan P, Tfelt-Hansen P The Headaches. 3 rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006; 55-61. Olesen J Goadsby PJ Ramadan N Tfelt-Hansen P Welch KM, ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ; 2006: 55-61.
77. Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products for treatment of nociceptive pain. CPMP/EWP/612/00. London: European Medicines Agency ; 2002 :
78. McGrath PJ, Unruh AM Wall and Melzack's Textbook of Pain. 5 th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2009; 291-304. McMahon SB Klotzenburg M, ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier ; 2009: 291-304.
79. Lund I, Lundeberg T, Sandberg L, Norrbrink Budh C, Kowalski J, Svensson E. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 ; 5: 31-31
80. Chapman CR Issues in pain measurement. Chapman CR Loeser JD, ed. New York: Raven Press ; 1989: 1-16.
81. Altman DG Headache treatment: trial methodology and new drugs. Olesen J Tfelt-Hansen P, ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven ; 1997: 27-33.