Utilizing qualitative data from nominal groups: Exploring the influences on treatment outcome prioritization with rheumatoid arthritis patients

Journal of Health Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 132-142

  Sanderson, Tessa ^a   Hewlett, Sarah ^a   Richards, Pam ^b   Morris, Marianne ^a   Calnan, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chronic illness; Methodology; Outcomes; Participation; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CONSENSUS; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84856865316     PISSN: 13591053     EISSN: 14617277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1359105311410758     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahmed S, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley J and Cohen S (2004) Response shift influenced estimates of change in health-related quality of life poststroke. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57(6): 561-570. (Pubitemid 38891493)
2. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJF and Cooper NS (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 31(3): 315-324. (Pubitemid 18091653)
3. Carr A, Hewlett S, Hughes R, et al. (2003) Rheumatology outcomes: The patient's perspective. Journal of Rheumatology 30(4): 880-883. (Pubitemid 36402793)
4. Craig G (2008) Involving users in developing health services. British Medical Journal 336(7639): 286.
5. Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. London: The Stationery Office.
6. Dewar A, White M, Posade S and Dillon W (2003) Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patients' perceived challenges and needs in a community health region. Health Expectations 6(1): 44-52. (Pubitemid 36460042)
7. Endacott R, Clifford C and Tripp J (1999) Can the needs of the critically ill child be identified using scenarios? Experiences of a modified Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(3): 665-676.
8. Felson DT, Anderson JJ and Boers M (1993) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary cores set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis & Rheumatism 36(6): 729-740. (Pubitemid 23175613)
9. Fleck E, Cumming P and Connolly L (2001) Using the nominal group technique to identify patient priorities for evaluating a service. Journal of Clinical Excellence 3(4): 205-208. (Pubitemid 34070738)
10. Food and Drug Administration (2009) Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labelling Claims, 18 December, UCM 193282. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
11. Ginsburg K, Menapace A and Slap G (1997) Factors affecting the decision to seek health care: The voice of adolescents. Pediatrics 100(6): 922-930. (Pubitemid 27516474)
12. Hewlett S (2003) Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology 30(4): 877-879. (Pubitemid 36402792)
13. Hewlett S, Cockshott Z, Byron M, et al. (2005) Patients' perceptions of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: Overwhelming, uncontrollable, ignored. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research) 53(5): 697-702. (Pubitemid 41463834)
14. Hewlett S, De Wit M, Richards P, et al. (2006) Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research) 55(4): 676-680. (Pubitemid 44289891)
15. Hewlett S, Smith AP and Kirwan JR (2002) Measuring the meaning of disability in rheumatoid arthritis: The personal impact health assessment questionnaire (PI HAQ). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 61(11): 986-993. (Pubitemid 35221687)
16. Jones J and Hunter D (1995) Qualitative research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 311(7001): 376-380.
17. Kalyoncu U, Dougados M, Daures J and Gossec L (2009) Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 68(2): 183-190.
18. Keeney S, Hasson F and McKenna H (2005) Consulting the oracle: Ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53(2): 205-212. (Pubitemid 43455545)
19. Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, Kelsey JL, et al. (1989) Estimates of the prevalence of selected arthritic and musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. Journal of Rheumatology 16(4): 427-441. (Pubitemid 19149397)
20. Loughlin K and Moore L (1979) Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. Journal of Medical Education 54(2): 101-106. (Pubitemid 10053478)
21. O'Hara L, De Souza LH and Ide L (2000) A Delphi study of self-care in a community population of people with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation 14(1): 62-71. (Pubitemid 30072223)
22. Ring L, Hofer S, Heuston F, Harris D and O'Boyle C (2005) Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): The example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 3: 55-62.
23. Sanderson T, Morris M, Calnan M, Richards P and Hewlett S (2010a) What outcomes from pharmacological treatments are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core set. Arthritis Care & Research 62(5): 640-646
24. Sanderson T, Morris M, Calnan M, Richards P and Hewlett S (2010b) Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: The rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacological interventions (RAPP-PI) outcomes. Arthritis Care & Research 62(5): 647-656.
25. Shaw KL, Southwood TR and McDonagh JE (2004) Developing a programme of transitional care for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Results of a postal survey. Rheumatology 43(2): 211-219. (Pubitemid 38219678)
26. Strauss A and Corbin J (1998) Grounded Theory methodology: An overview. In: Denzin N and Lincoln Y (eds) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: SAGE, 158-183.
27. Tuffrey-Wijne I, Bernal J, Butler G, Hollins S and Curfs L (2007) Using nominal group technique to investigate the views of people with intellectual disabilities on end-of-life care provision. Journal of Advanced Nursing 58(1): 80-89.