Measuring similarity in description logics using refinement operators

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6880 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 289-303

  Sánchez Ruiz, Antonio A ^a   Ontañón, Santiago ^b   González Calero, Pedro Antonio ^a   Plaza, Enric ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE IIIA CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESCRIPTION LOGIC; INSTANCE BASED LEARNING; KEY OPERATIONS; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; REFINEMENT OPERATORS; SIMILARITY ASSESSMENT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FORMAL LANGUAGES;

DATA DESCRIPTION;

EID: 84856862427     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23291-6_22     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Armengol, E., Plaza, E.: Relational case-based reasoning for carcinogenic activity prediction. Artif. Intell. Rev. 20(1-2), 121-141 (2003)
2. Ashburner, M.: Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25, 25-29 (2000)
3. Baader, F.: Least common subsumers and most specific concepts in a description logic with existential restrictions and terminological cycles. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 319-324. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2003), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1630659.1630706
4. Baader, F., Calvanese, D.,McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)
5. Badea, L., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.H.: A refinement operator for description logics. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 40-59. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
6. Bergmann, R., Stahl, A.: Similarity measures for object-oriented case representations. In: Smyth, B., Cunningham, P. (eds.) EWCBR 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1488, pp. 8-13. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
7. Blockeel, H., Ramon, J., Shavlik, J.W., Tadepalli, P.: ILP 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4894. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
8. Bodenreider, O., Smith, B., Kumar, A., Burgun, A.: Investigating subsumption in SNOMED CT: An exploration into large description logic-based biomedical terminologies. Artif. Intell. Med. 39, 183-195 (2007), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240342.1240604
9. Cojan, J., Lieber, J.: An algorithm for adapting cases represented in an expressive description logic. In: Bichindaritz, I., Montani, S. (eds.) ICCBR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6176, pp. 51-65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
10. d'Amato, C., Staab, S., Fanizzi, N.: On the influence of description logics ontologies on conceptual similarity. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
11. Emde, W., Wettschereck, D.: Relational instance based learning. In: Saitta, L. (ed.) Machine Learning - Proceedings 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 122-130. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1996)
12. González-Calero, P.A., Díaz-Agudo, B., Gómez- Albarrán, M.: Applying DLs for retrieval in case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Description Logics Workshop, DL 1999 (1999)
13. van Harmelen, F., McGuinness, D.L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C recommendation, W3C (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl- features-20040210/
14. Horváth, T., Wrobel, S., Bohnebeck, U.: Relational instance-based learning with lists and terms. Machine Learning 43(1-2), 53-80 (2001)
15. van der Laag, P.R.J., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.H.: Completeness and properness of refinement operators in inductive logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming 34(3), 201-225 (1998)
16. Larson, J., Michalski, R.S.: Inductive inference of VL decision rules. SIGART. Bull. 63(63), 38-44 (1977)
17. Lehmann, J., Haase, C.: Ideal downward refinement in the EL description logic. In: Raedt, L.D. (ed.) ILP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5989, pp. 73-87. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
18. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: Foundations of refinement operators for description logics. In: Blockeel, H., et al. (eds.) [7], pp. 161-174
19. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: A refinement operator based learning algorithm for the LC description logic. In: Blockeel, H., et al. (eds.) [7], pp. 147-160
20. Ontańón, S., Plaza, E.: On similarity measures based on a refinement lattice. In: Wilson, D., McGinty, L. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5650, pp. 240-255. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
21. Plotkin, G.D.: A note on inductive generalization. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 5, pp. 153-163. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1970)
22. Salotti, S., Ventos, V.: Study and formalization of a case-based reasoning system using a description logic. In: Smyth, B., Cunningham, P. (eds.) EWCBR 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1488, pp. 286-297. Springer, Heidelberg (1998) (Pubitemid 128145884)
23. Sánchez-Ruiz-Granados, A.A., González-Calero, P.A., Díaz-Agudo, B.: Abstraction in knowledge-rich models for case-based planning. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5650, pp. 313-327. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
24. Winkler,W.E., Thibaudeau, Y.: An application of the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage to the 1990 U.S. decennial census. In: U.S. Decennial Census. Technical report, US Bureau of the Census (1987)