Detection of mycobacterium bovis-infected dairy herds using PCR in bulk tank milk samples

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 132-137

  Zumárraga, Martín José ^a   Soutullo, Adriana ^b   García, María Inés ^c   Marini, Rocío ^c   Abdala, Alejandro ^a   Tarabla, Héctor ^a   Echaide, Susana ^a   López, Marcela ^d   Zervini, Elsa ^d   Canal, Ana ^b,c   Cataldi, Angel Adrián ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA INTA   (Argentina)

^b Ciencia y Tecnología de la Provincia de Santa Fe   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL LITORAL   (Argentina)

^d Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Dr Emilio Coni   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TAQ POLYMERASE;

ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS; CERTIFICATION; CULTURE MEDIUM; DAIRYING; DNA TEMPLATE; HERD; MILK; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; ARGENTINA; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DNA, BACTERIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MILK; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE; ZOONOSES;

BOVINAE; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS;

EID: 84856859998     PISSN: 15353141     EISSN: 15567125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2011.0963     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdala AA, Tarabla HD, and Bertero S. Estimacion de la pre-valencia de tuberculosis bovina en rodeos lecheros del de-partamento Las Colonias, Santa Fe. Revista FAVE Ciencias Veterinarias 2002;1:13-20. (In Spanish.)
2. Abu Al-Soud W and Radstrom P. Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-inhibiting samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:3748-3753. (Pubitemid 28462967)
3. Antognoli MC, Salman MD, Triantis J, et al. A one-tube nested polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis in spiked milk samples: An evaluation of concentration and lytic techniques. J Vet Diagn Invest 2001;13:111-116. (Pubitemid 33654172)
4. Bennett RM. Farm costs associated with premovement testing for bovine tuberculosis. Vet Rec 2009;164:77-79.
5. Bernardelli A, Nicola A, Alonso B, et al. Tuberculosis bovina: Evaluacion de tecnicas de diagnostico. Rev Med Vet 2005;86:183-194. (In Spanish.)
6. Cornejo BJ, Sahagun-Ruiz A, Suarez-Güemes F, et al. Comparison of C18-carboxypropylbetaine and glass bead DNA extraction methods for detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine milk samples and analysis of simples by PCR Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:3099-3101. (Pubitemid 28363194)
7. de la Rua-Domenech R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, et al. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: A review of the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci 2006;81:190-210. (Pubitemid 43905909)
8. de Kantor I: El tratamiento de la muestra previo al cultivo. In: Manual de Normas y Procedimientos Tecnicos para la Bacterioloǵia de la Tuberculosis. Nota Tecnica n° 11. Kantor I (ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro Panamericano de Zoonosis CEPANZO, OPS/OMS Press, 1986, pp. 27-29. (In Spanish.)
9. de Kantor IN, Ambroggi M, Poggi S, et al. Human Mycobacterium bovis infection in ten Latin American countries. Tuberculosis 2008;88:358-365.
10. Di Pinto A, Ciccarese G, Forte VT, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in milk using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Food Control 2006;17:776-780.
11. Ellingson JL, Anderson JL, Koziczkowski JJ, et al. Detection of viable Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in retail pasteurized whole milk by two culture methods and PCR. J Food Prot 2005;68:966-972. (Pubitemid 40641219)
12. Etchechoury I, Echeverŕia Valencia G, Morcillo N, et al. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium bovis isolates in Argentina: First description of a person-to-person transmission case. Zoonoses Public Health 2010;57:375-381.
13. Francis J, Seiler RJ, Wilkie IW, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of various tuberculin tests using bovine PPD and other tuberculins. Vet Rec 1978;103:420-425. (Pubitemid 9040448)
14. Gardner IA and Hird DW. Environmental source of mycobacter-iosis in California swine herd. Can J Vet Res 1989;53:33-37.
15. Hermans PW, van Soolingen D, Dale JW, et al. Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2051-2058. (Pubitemid 20260988)
16. Infortambo. La producción lechera sigue creciendo en Santa Fe. 2009. Available at: http://www.infortambo.com.ar/inter-na.php?id-editor=1212, accessed November 29, 2011.
17. Jayarao BM, Pillai SR, Wolfgang DR, et al. Evaluation of IS900-PCR assay for detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in cattle using quarter milk and bulk tank milk samples. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2004;1:17-26.
18. Michel AL, Müller B, and van Helden PD. Mycobacterium bovis at the animal-human interface: A problem, or not? Vet Microbiol 2010;140:371-381.
19. Ministerio de la Producción, Gobierno de Santa Fe. Vigilancia epidemiológica de la tuberculosis bovina por medio de la faena en la provincia de Santa Fe. Santa Fe, Argentina, 2008. (In Spanish.)
20. Neill SD, Cassidy J, Hanna J, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in skin test-negative cattle with an assay for bovine interferon-gamma. Vet Rec 1994;135:134-135. (Pubitemid 24245146)
21. Neill SD, Hanna J, Mackie DP, et al. Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from the respiratory tracts of skin test-negative cattle. Vet Rec 1992;131:45-47.
22. Oloya J, Opuda-Asibo J, Kazwala R, et al. Mycobacteria causing human cervical lymphadenitis in pastoral communities in the Karamoja region of Uganda. Epidemiol Infect 2008;136:636-643. (Pubitemid 351472173)
23. Paolicchi FA, Zumárraga MJ, Gioffre A, et al. Application of different methods for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in a dairy cattle herd in Argentina. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2003;50:20-26. (Pubitemid 36260837)
24. Pérez A, Reniero A, Forteis A, et al. Study of Mycobacterium bovis in milk using bacteriological methods and the polymerase chain reaction. Rev Argent Microbiol 2002;34:45-51. (Pubitemid 34285897)
25. Seiler RJ. The non-diseased reactor: Considerations on the interpretation of screening test results. Vet Rec 1979;105: 226-228.
26. SENASA. Resolución 145/2009. 2009a. Available at: http://www.senasa.gov.ar/contenido.php?to=n&in=1403&io=9279, accessed November 15, 2011. (In Spanish.)
27. SENASA. Torres P. Situación de la tuberculosis bovina en la Re-pública Argentina. 2009b. Available at: http://www.senasa.gov.ar/ Archivos/File/File1013-situacion-tuberculosis-31-12- 09.pdf, accessed November 15, 2011. (In Spanish.)
28. Serrano-Moreno BA, Romero TA, Arriaga C, et al. High frequency of Mycobacterium bovis DNA in colostra from tuberculous cattle detected by nested PCR. Zoonoses Public Health 2008;55:258-266. (Pubitemid 351634366)
29. Sreevatsan S, Bookout JB, Ringpis F, et al. A multiplex approach to molecular detection of Brucella abortus and/or Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2602-2610. (Pubitemid 30485137)
30. Torgerson P and Torgerson D. Benefits of stemming bovine TB need to be demonstrated. Nature 2009;457:657.
31. Vitale F, Capra G, Maxia L, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in cattle by PCR using milk, lymph node aspirates, and nasal swabs. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1050-1055. (Pubitemid 28146296)
32. Zanini MS, Moreira EC, Lopes MT, et al. Detection of Myco-bacterium bovis in milk by polymerase chain reaction. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1998;45:473-479. (Pubitemid 128531230)
33. Zumárraga MJ, Meikle V, Bernardelli A, et al. Use of touch-down polymerase chain reaction to enhance the sensitivity of Mycobacterium bovis detection. J Vet Diagn Invest 2005;17: 232-238. (Pubitemid 40747993)
34. Zumarraga MJ, Cataldi A, Bigi F, et al. Aplicacion de la reaccion en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) en la deteccion de micobacterias en leche. Rev Arg Microbiol 1999;31:4-5. (In Spanish.) (Pubitemid 29474134)