Family decision making in child welfare: Challenges in developing a knowledge base for practice

Child Abuse Review

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 41-52

  Morris, Kate ^a   Connolly, Marie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Care and protection; Family decision making; Family group conferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856857264     PISSN: 09529136     EISSN: 10990852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/car.1143     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Brown L. 2003. Mainstream or margin? The current use of family group conferences in child welfare practice in the UK. Child & Family Social Work 8(4): 331-340.
2. Brown L. 2007. The adoption and implementation of a service innovation in a social work setting-A case study of family group conferencing in the UK. Social Policy and Society 6(3): 321-332.
3. Burford G, Connolly M, Morris K, Pennell J. 2009. Family Involvement Strategies: An Annotated Bibliography. American Humane Association, New York, USA. Available: [20 May 2010]
4. Cameron M. 2006. Alternate Dispute Resolution: Aboriginal Models and Practices: Literature Review. Ministry of Children and Family Development: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
5. Clarke H, Hughes N. 2010. Family minded policy and whole family practice: developing a critical research framework. Journal of Social Policy and Society. 9(4) In press.
6. Connolly M. 2006a. Fifteen years of family group conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand. British Journal of Social Work 36(4): 523-540.
7. Connolly M. 2006b. Upfront and personal: Confronting dynamics in the family group conference. Family Process 45(3): 345-357.
8. Connolly M. 2007. Practice frameworks: Conceptual maps to guide interventions in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work 37(5): 825-837.
9. Connolly M. 2010. Engaging family members in decision making (chapter 10). In Strengthening Fragile Families: Intersections and Innovations, Scott D, Arney F (eds). Cambridge University Press: Melbourne.
10. Connolly M, Healy K. 2009. Social work practice theories and frameworks. In Social Work: Contexts and Practice, Connolly M, Harms L (eds). Oxford University Press: Melbourne; 19-36.
11. Connolly M, Ward T. 2008. Morals, Rights and Practice in the Human Services: Effective and Fair Decision-making in Health, Social Care and Criminal Justice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London.
12. Crow G, Marsh P, Holton E. 2004. Supporting pupils, schools and families: An evaluation of the Hampshire Family Group Conferences in Education Project. University of Sheffield and Hampshire County Council: Sheffield, England.
13. Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008) Revised Every Child Matters Framework. DCSF, London.
14. Desmeules GH. 2003. Family group conferencing: A decolonization journey for aboriginal children and families in child protection services. Unpublished master's thesis, Royal Roads University, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
15. Doolan M. 2009. Social work and youth justice (chapter 22). In Social Work: Contexts and practice, Connolly M, Harms L (eds). Oxford University Press: Melbourne.
16. Duke University, Center for Child and Family Policy, Terry Stanford Institute of Public Policy. 2006. Multiple response system (MRS) evaluation report to the North Carolina Division of Social Services (NCDSS). Durham, NC. June. Available: [28 February 2009].
17. Edwards M, Tinworth K, Burford G, Pennell J. March 2007. Family team meeting (FTM) process, outcome, and impact evaluation phase II report. American Humane Association: Englewood, CO.
18. Falck S. 2008. Do family group conferences lead to a better situation for the children involved? NOVA (Norwegian Social Research): Ministry of Education and Research Oslo, Norway.
19. Glode J, Wien F. 2007. Evaluating the family group conferencing approach in a First Nations context. In Enfants à proteger, parents à aider, des univers à rapproche, Chamberland C, Léveillé S, Trocmé N (eds). Presses de l'Université de Québec; Quebec City, Canada; 264-276.
20. Gould N. (2006). An inclusive approach to knowledge for mental health social work practice and policy. British Journal of Social Work 36: 109-125.
21. Gunderson K, Cahn K, Wirth J. 2003. The Washington State long-term outcome study. Protecting Children 18(1 & 2): 42-47.
22. Holland S, O'Neill S. 2006. 'We had to be there to make sure it was what we wanted': Enabling children's participation in family decision-making through the family group conference. Childhood 13(1): 91-111.
23. Holland S, Rivett M. 2008. 'Everyone started shouting': Making connections between the process of family group conferences and family therapy practice. British Journal of Social Work 38: 21-38.
24. Holland S, Scourfield J, O'Neill S, Pithouse A. 2005. Democratising the family and the state? The case of family group conferences in child welfare. Journal of Social Policy 34(1): 59-77.
25. Horwitz M. 2008. Family conferencing as core child protection practice. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Kiely P, Bussey K. 2001. Family group conferencing: A longitudinal evaluation. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
27. Koch M, Hilt L, Jenkins L, Dunn T. 2006. Family group conferencing: 45 children a 12 month study. Presentation at the World Forum: Future Directions in Child Welfare, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, November.
28. Laws S, Kirby P. 2007. Under the table or at the table: Supporting children and families in family group conferences-a summary of the Daybreak research. Brighton and Hove Children and Young People's Trust.
29. Marsh P, Crow G. 1998. Family Group Conferences in Child Welfare. Blackwell Science: Oxford.
30. Ministry of Justice. 2008. The Public Law Outline. Ministry of Justice: London.
31. Morris K. 2007. Camden FGC service: An evaluation of service use and outcomes. September. Available: [28 February 2009].
32. Morris K, Burford G. 2009. Family Decision Making: New Spaces for Participation and Resistance. In Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Policy, Barnes M, Prior D (eds). Policy Press: Bristol.
33. Morris K, Featherstone B. 2010. Investing in children, regulating parents, thinking family: a decade of tensions and contradictions. Social Policy and Society. 9(4) In press.
34. Morris K, Tunnard J (eds). 1996. Family Group Conferences: Messages from UK research and practice. Family Rights Group: London.
35. nd edition. Blackwell: Oxford.
36. Orend B. 2002. Human Rights: Concept and Context. Broadview Press: Ontario, ON.
37. Pennell J, Burford G. 2000. Family group decision making: Protecting children and women. Child Welfare 79(2): 131-158.
38. Social Exclusion Task Force. 2008. Think Research: Using research evidence to inform service development for vulnerable groups. London: Cabinet Office.
39. Staples J. 2007. Knowle West Family Group Conference Project: Evaluation Report. Bristol, England: Barnardo's/Knowle West Neighborhood Renewal.
40. Sundell K, Vinnerljung B. 2004. Outcomes of family group conferencing in Sweden: A 3-year follow-up. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28:267-287.
41. Titcomb A, LeCroy C. 2003. Evaluation of Arizona's family group decision making program. Protecting Children 18(1 & 2): 58-64.
42. Titcomb A, LeCroy C. 2005. Outcomes of Arizona's family group decision making program. Protecting Children 19(4): 47-53.
43. United Nations. 2006. Conventions on the Rights of the Child (UNCROC). Available: [28 February 2009].
44. Walker L. 2005. A cohort study of ohana conferencing in child abuse and neglect cases. Protecting Children 19(4): 36-46.
45. Ward T, Connolly M. 2008. A human rights-based practice framework for sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 14(2): 87-98.
46. Wheeler CE, Johnson S. 2003. Evaluating family group decision making: The Santa Clara example. Protecting Children 18(1 & 2): 65-69.