Video quality assessments on digital TV and video streaming services using objective metrics

IEEE Latin America Transactions

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1184-1189

  Zegarra Rodriguez, Demostenes ^a   Bressan, Graca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Digital TV; fading; packet loss; PSNR; QoE; SSIM; streaming; video quality; VQM

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL TV; FADING; PSNR; QOE; SSIM; VIDEO QUALITY; VQM;

ACOUSTIC STREAMING; DIGITAL TELEVISION; MOBILE DEVICES; PACKET LOSS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; VOICE/DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 84856852803     PISSN: 15480992     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2012.6142458     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Y. Lu, B Fallica, FA Kuipers, RE Kooij, Assessing the quality of experience of sopcast, International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology, vol.4, pp. 11-23, 2009.
2. M. N. Zapater, G Bressan A proposed approach for quality of experience assurance of IPTV, First International Conference on the Digital Society, 2007, pp. 25-25, 2007.
3. R. Jain.; Quality of experience, IEEE Multimedia, IEEE, pp. 96, 2004.
4. G. Harman, The Intrinsic Quality of Experience, in Philosophical perspective JSTOR, 1990.
5. B. Corrie, H. Wong, T. Zimmerman, S. Marsh, A.S. Patrick, J. Singer, B. Emond, S. No, Towards quality of experience in advanced collaborative environments, the 3rd Annual Workshop on Advanced Collaborative Environments, Seattle, Washington, June 22, 2003.
6. International Recommendation Union, http://www.itu.int.
7. Video Quality Experts Group, http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg.
8. Video Quality Experts Group, ftp://ftp.crc.ca/crc/vqeg.
9. K. Seshadrinathan, R. Soundararajan, A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack, Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video, accepted for publication, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009.
10. K. Seshadrinathan, R. Soundararajan, A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack, A Subjective Study to Evaluate Video Quality Assessment Algorithms, to appear, SPIE Proceedings Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, Jan. 2010.
11. A. Takahashi, D. Hands, and V. Barriac, Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 78, Feb. 2008.
12. M. Siller and J.Woods, QoE in multimedia services transmission, in Proc. 7th World Multiconf. Systemics, Cybernetics Inf., 2003, vol. 7, pp. 74-76.
13. M. Venkataraman, S. Sengupta, M. Chatterjee, and R. Neogi, Towards a video QoE definition in converged networks, in Proc. Int. Conf. Digital Telecommun., 2007, pp. 92-97.
14. K. Yamagishi and T. Hayashi, Parametric packet-layer model for monitoring video quality of IPTV services, in Proc. Int. Conf. Commun., 2008, pp. 1026-1030.
15. J. Kim, H. Lee, M. Lee, H. Lee, W. Lyu, and G. Choi, The QoE evaluation method through the QoS-QoE correlation model, in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Networked Comput. Adv. Inf. Manage. (NCM), 2008, vol. 2, pp. 719-725.
16. P. Simoens, S. Latre, B. De Vleeschauwer, W. Van de Meerssche, F. De Turck, B. Dhoedt, P. Demeester, S. Van Den Berghe, and E. Gilon, Design of an autonomic QoE reasoner for improving access network performance, in Proc. Int. Conf. Autonomic Autonomous Syst., 2008, pp. 233-240.
17. M. Garcia and A. Raake, Impairment-factor-based audio-visual quality model for IPTV, in Proc. Int. Workshop Quality Multimedia Exper. (QoMEX), Jul. 2009.
18. G. W. Cermak, Subjective video quality as a function of bit rate, frame rate, packet loss, and codec, in Proc. Int. Workshop Quality Multimedia Exper. (QoMEX), Jul. 2009.
19. P. Calyam, P. Chandrasekaran, G. Trueb, N. Howes, D. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Xiong, R. Ramnath, and D. Yang, Impact of router queuing disciplines on multimedia QoE in IPTV deployments, in Proc. Int. Workshop Quality Multimedia Exper. (QoMEX), Jul. 2009.
20. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11, Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures.
21. ITU-T Recommendation-P.910, Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications, Geneva, Sep. 1999.
22. ITU-T Recommendation-P.930, Principles of a reference impairment system for video, Geneva, Aug. 1996.
23. ITU-T Recommendation-P.931, Multimedia communications delay, synchronization and frame rate measurement, Geneva, Nov. 1998.
24. Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik, A universal image quality index, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 9, pp. 81-84, Mar. 2002.
25. Z. Wang, Rate scalable Foveated image and video communications, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Comput. Eng., Univ. Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Dec. 2001.
26. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, and L. Lu, Why is image quality assessment so difficult, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, Orlando, FL, May 2002, pp. 3313.
27. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. Sheikh, Image Quality Assesment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, No. 4, April 2004.
28. F. Xiao, DCT-based Video Quality Evaluation, 2000.
29. E. O Elliott. A model of the switched telephone network for data communications. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 44:89 109.
30. E. N. Gilbert, Capacity of a burst-noise channel. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 39:1253 1265.
31. http://netgroup.uniroma2.it/twiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/NetemCLG.
32. The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org.
33. Linux Fundantion, http://www.linuxfundantion.org.
34. Graphics and Media Lab (Video Group), http://compression.ru/video/ quality-measure.
35. CamStudio Open Source, http://www.camstudio.org.
36. NCH Software, http://www.nchsoftware.com/videopad.
37. ElektroBit, Propsim C8 Radio Channel Emulator Operator Manual, 2007.