Evidence for morphological composition at the form level in speech production

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 818-836

  Lüttmann, Heidi ^a   Zwitserlood, Pienie ^a   Böhl, Andrea ^a   Bölte, Jens ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

German compounds; Language production; Lexical selection; Morphology; Picture word interference

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FACILITATION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MORPHOMETRICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84856850610     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.575774     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abdel-Rahman, R., and, Melinger, A. 2009. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24: 713-734.
2. Allen, M., and, Badecker, W. 1999. Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41: 105-123.
3. Allen, M., and, Badecker, W. 2002. Stem homographs and lemma level representations. Brain and Language, 81: 79-88. (Pubitemid 34762020)
4. Andrews, S., Miller, B., and, Rayner, K. 2004. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16: 285-311. (Pubitemid 38133679)
5. Badecker, W., and, Caramazza, A. 1991. Morphological composition in the lexical output system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8: 335-367.
6. Benjamini, Y., and, Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57: 289-300.
7. Bien, H., Levelt, W. J. M., and, Baayen, R. H. 2005. Frequncy effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102: 17876-17881.
8. Bozic, M., Marslen-Wilson, W., Stamatakis, E. A., Davis, M. H., and, Tyler, L. K. 2007. Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: Neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19: 1464-1475. (Pubitemid 47358149)
9. Blte, J., Bhl, A., Dobel, C., and, Zwitserlood, P. 2009. Effects of referential ambiguity, time constraints and addressee orientation on the production of morphologically complex words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21: 1166-1199.
10. Caramazza, A. 1997. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 177-208. (Pubitemid 127523101)
11. Costa, A., Alario, F., and, Caramazza, A. 2005. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12: 125-131. (Pubitemid 40900502)
12. Damian, M. F., and, Martin, R. C. 1999. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25: 345-361.
13. Dell, G. S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93: 283-321.
14. Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P., and, Blte, J. 2004. The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain & Language, 90: 203-212. (Pubitemid 38681135)
15. Feldman, L., Barac-Cikoja, D., and, Kosti, A. 2002. Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory and Cognition, 30: 629-636. (Pubitemid 34832967)
16. Feldman, L., Soltano, E., Pastizzo, M., and, Francis, S. 2004. What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?. Brain and Language, 90: 17-30. (Pubitemid 38681118)
17. Finkbeiner, M., and, Caramazza, A. 2006. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a stroop-like task. Cortex, 42: 790-796. (Pubitemid 46768731)
18. Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., and, Pollatsek, A. 2008. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99: 87-107.
19. Garrett, M. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In The psychology of learning and motivation, Edited by: Bower, G. 133-177. New York, NY: Academic Press.
20. Garrett, M. 1992. Disorders of lexical selection. Cognition, 42: 143-180.
21. Glaser, W. R., and, Glaser, M. O. 1989. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118: 13-42.
22. Gumnior, H., Blte, J., and, Zwitserlood, P. 2006. A chatterbox is a box: Morphology in german word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21: 920-944. (Pubitemid 44650066)
23. Janssen, N., Bi, Y., and, Caramazza, A. 2008. A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23: 1191-1223.
24. Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., and, Libben, G. 1999. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68: 362-369. (Pubitemid 29370248)
25. La Heij, W. 1988. Components of stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory and Cognition, 16: 400-410.
26. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., and, Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-75. (Pubitemid 29207458)
27. Libben, G. 2006. Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In The representation and processing of compound words, Edited by: Libben, G. and Jarema, G. 1-22. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., and, Sandra, D. 2003. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84: 50-64. (Pubitemid 36268704)
29. Longtin, C., Segui, J., and, Hallé, P. A. 2003. Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18: 313-334. (Pubitemid 36817993)
30. Lupker, S. J. 1979. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7: 485-495.
31. Lupker, S. J. 1982. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36: 349-367.
32. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., and, Caramazza, A. 2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33: 503-535.
33. Maxwell, S. E., and, Delaney, H. D. 1990. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
34. Meyer, A. S., and, Schriefers, H. 1991. Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17: 1146-1160.
35. Plaut, D., and, Gonnerman, L. 2000. Are nonsemantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15: 445-485.
36. Roelofs, A. 1992. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42: 107-142.
37. Roelofs, A. 1996. Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 854-876. (Pubitemid 126169356)
38. Roelofs, A., and, Baayen, H. 2002. Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9: 132-138.
39. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., and, Levelt, W. J. 1990. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 86-102.
40. Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., and, Rsler, F. 2009. When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24: 337-375.
41. Starreveld, P. A., and, La Heij, W. 1996. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 896-918.
42. Taft, M. 2004. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57A: 745-765. (Pubitemid 38706833)
43. Taft, M., and, Ardasinski, S. 2006. Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed verbs. Mental Lexicon, 1: 183-199.
44. Taft, M., and, Forster, K. I. 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14: 638-647.
45. Taft, M., and, Forster, K. I. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15: 607-620.
46. Zwitserlood, P. 1994. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9: 341-368.
47. Zwitserlood, P., Blte, J., and, Dohmes, P. 2000. Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15: 563-591.
48. Zwitserlood, P., Blte, J., and, Dohmes, P. 2002. Where and how morphologically complex words interplay with naming pictures. Brain and Language, 81: 358-367. (Pubitemid 34762041)