Chromosome microarray in Australia: A guide for paediatricians

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Palmer, Elizabeth E ^a   Peters, Greg B ^b   Mowat, David ^a,c  

^a SYDNEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

autistic disorder; chromosome disorder; congenital abnormality; genetic counselling; intellectual disability; microarray analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; COUNSELING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FRAGILE X SYNDROME; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DISORDER; KARYOTYPE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PEDIATRICIAN; POINT MUTATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TURNAROUND TIME;

AUSTRALIA; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS, PERVASIVE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYTOGENETICS; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; KARYOTYPE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PEDIATRICS;

EID: 84856845510     PISSN: 10344810     EISSN: 14401754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02081.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rauch A, Hoyer J, Guth S, et al,. Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2006; 140A: 2063-74. (Pubitemid 44522453)
2. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al,. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010; 86: 749-64.
3. Edelmann L, Hirschhorn K,. Clinical utility of array CGH for the detection of chromosomal imbalances associated with mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009; 1151: 157-66.
4. Shaw-Smith C, Higgins JP, Burton H, et al,. Array CGH in patients with learning disability (mental retardation) and congenital anomalies: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies and 13 926 subjects. Genet. Med. 2009; 11: 139-46.
5. Moeschler JB,. Medical genetics diagnostic evaluation of the child with global developmental delay or intellectual disability. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2008; 21: 117-22. (Pubitemid 351644150)
6. Srour M, Rorem EA, Hall N, Shaffer LG,. Array comparative genomic hybridisation in global developmental delay. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2008; 147B: 1101-8.
7. Stankiewicz P, Beaudet AL,. Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay and idiopathic mental retardation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007; 17: 182-92. (Pubitemid 46843553)
8. Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG, et al,. Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010; 19: 1263-75.
9. Lagerberg M, Nordenskjöld M, Schoumans J,. High-resolution molecular karyotyping in patients with developmental delay and/or multiple congenital anomalies in a clinical setting. Clin. Genet. 2011; 79: 147-57.
10. Sebat J, et al,. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 2007; 316: 445-9. (Pubitemid 46651493)
11. Grati FR, Lesperance MM, De Toffol S, et al,. Pure monosomy and pure trisomy of 13q21.2-31.1 consequent to a familial insertional translocation: exclusion of PCDH9 as the responsible gene for autosomal dominant auditory neuropathy (AUNA1). Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2009; 149A: 906-13.
12. Raj A, Rifkin SA, Andersen E, van Oudenaarden A,. Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance. Nature 2010; 463: 913-8.
13. Netzer C, Klein C, Johihase J, Kubisch C,. New challenges for informed consent through whole genome array testing. J. Med. Genet. 2009; 46: 495-6.
14. Schwarzbraun T, Langmann A, Gruber-Sedlmayr U, et al,. Predictive diagnosis of the cancer prone Li-Fraumeni syndrome by accident: new challenges through whole-genome array testing. J. Med. Genet. 2009; 46: 341-4.
15. Evangelidou P, Sismani C, Ioannides M, et al,. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations. Mol. Cytogenet. 2010; 3: 24.
16. Ishikawa S, Fitch KR,. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006; 444: 444-54. (Pubitemid 44809057)
17. Brunetti-Pierri N, Berg JS, Scaglia F, et al,. Recurrent reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications associated with microcephaly or macrocephaly and developmental and behavioral abnormalities. Nat.Genet. 2008; 40: 1466-71.
18. Darilek S, Ward P, Pursley A, et al,. Pre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: genetic counseling perspectives. Genet. Med. 2008; 10: 13-8.
19. Ng SB, Buckingham KJ, Lee C, et al,. Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a Mendelian disorder. Nat. Genet. 2010; 42: 30-5.
20. Hoischen A, van Bon BW, Gilissen C, et al,. De novo mutations of SETBP1 cause Schinzel-Giedion syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2010; 42: 483-5.
21. Lupski JR, Reid JG, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, et al,. Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 362: 1181-91.
22. Choi M, Scholl UI, Ji W,. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009; 106: 19096-101.