Paraphilia NOS, Nonconsent: Not ready for the Courtroom

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 555-561

  Frances, Allen ^a   First, Michael B ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEXUAL DEVIATION; UNITED STATES;

COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; PARAPHILIAS; PRISONERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856818931     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997)
2. Kansas v. Crane 534 U.S. 407 (2002)
3. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 2000
4. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994
5. Doren D: Evaluating Sex Offenders: A Manual for Civil Commitments and Beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002
6. Frances A, First MB: Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSMIV- TR and should not become one in DSM-5. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 39:78-85, 2011
7. Frances A, Sreenivasan S, Weinberger LE: Defining mental disorder when it really counts: DSM-IV-TR and SVP/SDP statutes. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:375- 384, 2008
8. First MB, Frances A: Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes-the case of paraphilias. Am J Psychiatry 165:1240-1241, 2008
9. First MB, Halon RL: Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:443-454, 2008
10. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980
11. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987
12. Zander TK: Inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:459-469, 2008
13. Quinsey VL, Chaplin TC, Varney G: A comparison of rapists and non-sex offenders sexual preferences for mutually consenting sex, rape, and physical abuse of women. Behav Assess 3:125-137, 1981
14. Quinsey VL, Chaplin TC, Upfold D: Sexual arousal to nonsexual violence and sadomasochistic themes among rapists and non-sex offenders. J Consult Clin Psychol 52:651-657, 1984
15. Quinsey VL, Chaplin TC: Stimulus control of rapist's and nonsex offender's sexual arousal. Behav Assess 6:169-176, 1984
16. DSM-5 Paraphilia SubWorkgroup: Paraphilic Coercive Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Available at http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid_416. Accessed April 11, 2011
17. Frances A. Opening Pandora's box: The 19 worst suggestions for DSM5. Psychiatric Times. February 11, 2010
18. Lalumière ML, Quinsey VL, Harris GT, et al. Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometric assessments?-sexual coercion: understanding and management. Edited by Prentky RA, Janus E, Seto M. New York: New York Academy of Medicine, 2003, pp 211-224
19. Quinsey VL: Coercive paraphilic disorder. Arch Sex Behav 39: 405-410, 2010
20. Knight RA: Is a diagnostic category for paraphilic coercive disorder defensible? Arch Sex Behav 39:419-426, 2010
21. Thornton D: Evidence regarding the need for a diagnostic category for a coercive paraphilia. Arch Sex Behav 39:411-418, 2009
22. Lohr BA, Adams HE, Davis JM: Sexual arousal to erotic and aggressive stimuli in sexually coercive and noncoercive men. J Abnorm Psychol 106:230-242, 1997
23. Barbaree HE, Marshall WL: The role of male sexual arousal in rape: six models. J Consult Clin Psychol 59:621-630, 1991
24. Levenson J: Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida. Law Hum Behav 28:357- 368, 2004
25. Pincus H, Frances A, Davis W, et al: DSM-IV and new diagnostic categories: holding the line on proliferation. Am J Psychiatry 149: 112-117, 1992
26. Sreenivasan S, Frances A, Weinberger LE: Normative versus consequential ethics in sexually violent predator laws: an ethics conundrum for psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 38:386-391, 2010