Allometries, biomass stocks and biomass allocation in the thermophilic Spanish juniper woodlands of Southern Spain

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 270, Issue , 2012, Pages 85-93

  Garcia Morote F A ^a   Lopez Serrano F R ^a   Andres M ^a   Rubio, E ^a   Gonzalez Jimenez J L ^a   de las Heras, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aboveground biomass; Allometry; Belowground biomass; Biomass allocation; Juniperus thurifera

Indexed keywords

ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS; ALLOMETRY; BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; JUNIPERUS THURIFERA;

FORESTRY; SOILS;

BIOMASS;

ALLOMETRY; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; FOLIAGE; FOREST SOIL; GROWTH RATE; PLANT COMMUNITY; ROOT-SHOOT RATIO; SOIL QUALITY; SURVIVAL; THERMOPHILY; WOODLAND;

BIOMASS; DENSITY; FORESTRY; JUNIPERUS THURIFERA; SITES; SOIL; SPAIN;

SPAIN;

CONIFEROPHYTA; JUNIPERUS; JUNIPERUS THURIFERA;

EID: 84856774563     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Albaugh T., Allen L., Fox T. Individual tree crown and stand development in Pinus taeda under different fertilization and irrigation regimes. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 234:10-23.
2. António N., Margarida T., Tomé J., Soares P., Fontes L. Effect of tree, stand and site variables on the allometry of Eucaliptus globulus tree biomass. Can. J. For. Res. 2007, 37:895-906.
3. Badri, W., Gauquelin, T., Bertaudiere, V., Montes, N., 2006. Potentialites ligneuses d́un peuplement a genevrier thurifere (Juniperus thurifera L) du haut Atlas de Marrakech (Maroc), In: García, M. (Ed.), III Coloquio Internacional sobre Sabinares y Enebrales, Tomo II, Junta de Castilla y León, pp. 329-336.
4. Baskerville G. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res. 1972, 2(1):49-53.
5. Belsley D., Kuh E., Welsch R. Regressions diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity 1980, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
6. Bertaudière V., Montès N., Badri W., Gauquelin T. La structure multicaule du genévrier thurifère: avantage adaptatif à un environnement sévère?. écologie 2001, 324:627-634.
7. Bi H., Turner J., Lambert M. Additive biomass equations for native eucalypt forest trees of temperate Australia. Trees 2004, 18:467-479.
8. Bond-Lamberty B., Wang C., Gower S. Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba. Can. J. For. Res. 2002, 32(8):1441-1450.
9. Cairns M., Brown S., Helmer E., Baumgardner G. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia 1997, 111:1-11.
10. Chan S., Radosevich S., Grotta A. Effects of contrasting light and soil moisture availability on the growth and biomass allocation of Douglas-fir and red alder. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33:106-117.
11. Costa M., Gómez F., Morla F., Sainz H. Caracterización fitoecológica de los sabinares albares de la Península Ibérica. Orsis 1993, 8:79-93.
12. Eddleman L., Miller P., Miller R., Dysart P. Western Juniper Woodlands (of the Pacific Northwest) Science Assessment 1994, Rangeland Resources Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
13. Evrendilek F., Berberoglu S., Taskinsu-Meydan S., Yilmaz E. Quantifying carbon budgets of conifer Mediterranean forest ecosystems. Turkey. Env. Mon. Ass. 2006, 119:527-543.
14. FAO, 1988. FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend. World Soil Resources Report 60, FAO, Rome.
15. Farjon, A., 2005. A monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopitys, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
16. Gillespie A., Allen H., Vose J.M. Amount and vertical distribution of foliage of young loblolly pine trees as affected by canopy position and silvicultural treatment. Can. J. For. Res. 1994, 24:1337-1344.
17. Gower S., Gholz K., Nakane K., Baldwin V. Production and carbon allocation in pine forests. Ecol. Bull. 1994, 43:115-135.
18. Gower S., Isebrands J., Sheriff D. Carbon allocation and accumulation in conifers. Resource of Physiology of Conifers: Acquisition, Allocation and Utilization 1995, 217-254. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego. W. Smith (Ed.).
19. Grier C., Elliott K., McCullough D. Biomass distribution and productivity of Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma woodlands of North-Central Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 1992, 50:331-350.
20. IPCC, 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 4), Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, In: Paustian K. et al. (Eds.), IPCC, UNEP, WMO, Geneva, Hayama, Japan.
21. Kershaw J., Maguire D. Crown structure in western hemlock, Douglas-fir, and grand fir in western Washington: trends in branch-level mass and leaf area. Can. J. For. Res. 1995, 25:1897-1912.
22. Köppen W. Das geographische System der Klimate. Handbuch der Klimatologie 1936, C1-C44. Gebr Borntröger I, Berlin. W. Köppen, R. Geiger (Eds.).
23. Landsberg J.J., Gower S.T. Applications of physiological ecology to forest management 1997, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, USA.
24. Lieth H. Primary production of the major vegetation units of the world. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Ecological Studies 1975, 14:203-215. Springer, New York.
25. López, G., 2001. Los árboles y arbustos de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Tomo, I. (Ed.) Mundi-Prensa, Madrid.
26. López Serrano F., García Morote F., Andrés Abellán M., Tendero A., Del Cerro A. Site and weather effects in allometries: a simple approach to climate change effect on pines. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 215:251-270.
27. Maguire D., Bennett W. Patters in vertical distribution of foliage in young coastal Douglas-fire. Can. J. For. Res. 1996, 26:1991-2005.
28. Miller, P.M., 1990. Physiological ecology of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis Hook. ssp. occidentalis). Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
29. Mokany K., Raison J., Prokushkin S. Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biol. 2006, 12:84-96.
30. Montès N., Gauquelin T., Bertaudière V., Badri V., Zaoui El.H. A non-destructive method for estimating above-ground biomass in threatened woodlands. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 130:37-46.
31. Montès N., Bertaudière-Montes V., Badri W., Zaoui El., Gauquelin T. Biomass and nutrient content of a semi-arid mountain ecosystem: the Juniperus thurifera L. woodland of Azzaden Valley (Morocco). For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 166:35-43.
32. Montgomery D., Peck E. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis 1992, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
33. Neter J., Kutner M., Wasserman W., Nachtsheim C. Applied linear statistical models 1996, McGraw-Hill, Chicago. 4th ed.
34. Norris M., Blair J., Johson C., McKane R. Assessing changes in biomass, productivity, and C and N storages following Juniperus virginiana forest expansion into tallgrass prairie. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31:1940-1946.
35. Parresol B. Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons. For. Sci. 1999, 45(4):573-593.
36. Pascual, L., Fernández, M., Pérez, J., Moyano, A., Sanz, A., 2006. Estimación de la biomasa aérea y determinación de sus características químico-energéticas en un monte de Juniperus thurifera en Soria (España), In: García, M., (Ed.), III Coloquio Internacional sobre Sabinares y Enebrales, Tomo II, Junta de Castilla y León, pp 345-353.
37. Porté A., Bosc A., Champion I., Loustau D. Estimating the foliage area of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) branches and crowns with application to modelling the foliage area distribution in the crown. Ann. For. Sci. 2000, 57:73-86.
38. Pregitzer K., Euskirchen E. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Global Change Biol. 2004, 10:1-26.
39. Raven J., Edwards D. Roots: evolutionary origins and biogeochemical significance. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52:381-401.
40. Schmidt T., Wardle T. Impact of pruning Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana). West. J. Appl. Forest. 2002, 4:189-193.
41. Shinozaki K., Yoda K., Hozumi K., Kira T. A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Japanese Journal of Ecology 1964, 14:97-105.
42. Sprugel D., Hinckley T., Schaap W. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1991, 22:309-334.
43. Stat point, 1982-2006. Stat point, Inc., STATGRAPHICS Centurion XV, vers. 15.1.02.
44. Vanninen P., Mäkelä A. Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. Tree Physiology 1999, 19:823-830.
45. Vogt K., Vogt D., Palmiotto P., Boon P., ÓHara J., Asbjornsen H. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 1996, 187:159-217.
46. Zianis D., Mencuccini M. On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 187:311-332.