Lessons from an integrative research on sustainability urban: The project "Risk Habitat Megacity" in Santiago de Chile, 2006-2010;Lecciones de una investigación integrativa sobre sustentabilidad urbana: El proyecto "risk habitat megacity" en santiago de Chile, 2006-2010

Eure

Volumn 38, Issue 113, 2012, Pages 147-155

  Barton, Jonathan ^a   Kopfmüller, Jürgen ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEGACITY; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN AREA;

CHILE; METROPOLITANA; SANTIAGO [METROPOLITANA];

EID: 84856773026     PISSN: 02507161     EISSN: 07176236     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0250-71612012000100007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bammer, G. (2008). Enhancing research collaborations.?ree key management challenges. Research Policy, 37(5), 875-887. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004
2. Barton, J. & Kopfmüller, J. (2011). Diversity in integrative urban sustainability research. Lessons from the 'Risk Habitat Megacity' project on Santiago de Chile, 2006-10. Working Paper.
3. Barton, J. & Kopfmüller, J. (Eds.) (En prensa). Santiago 2030. ¿Hacia la sustentabilidad? Santiago: EURE Libros.
4. Brunckhorst, D. (2005). Integration research for shaping sustainable regional landscapes. Journal of Research Practice, 1(2), 1-24. Disponible en http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/16/28
5. Corley, E. A., Boardman, P.C. & Bozeman, B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy, 35(7), 975-993. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.003
6. De Jong, S. P. L., Van Arensbergen, P., Daemen, F., Van der Meulen, B. & Van den Besselaar, P. (2011). Evaluation of research in context. An approach and two cases. Research Evaluation, 20(1), 61-72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876346
7. Feller, I. (2006). Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria. Issues in assessing interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 5-15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776020
8. Heinrichs, D., Krellenberg, K., Hansjürgens, B. & Martínez, F. (Eds.) (2011). Risk Habitat Megacity. e case of Santiago de Chile. Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Keiner, M., Zegras, C., Schmid, W. A. & Salmerón, D. (Eds.) (2004). From understanding to action. Sustainable urban development in medium-sized cities in Aica and Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer.
10. Kopfmüller, J. Brandl, V. & Jörissen, J. (2001). Nachhaltige Entwicklung Integrativ Betrachtet: Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Berlin: ITAS.
11. Krellenberg, K.; Kopfmüeller, J., Barton, J. & Heinrichs, D. (2010). Introduction. En VV.AA. How sustainable is Santiago de Chile: synthesis report. Leipzig: UFZ Report.
12. Meagher, L., Lyall, C. & Nutley, S. (2008). Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation, 17(3), 163-173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820208X331720
13. Newman, L. (2006). Change, uncertainty, and futures of sustainable development. Futures, 38, 633-637.
14. Pinson, D. (2004). Urban planning: an 'undisciplined' discipline? Futures, 36, 503-513.
15. Pohl, C. (2005). Transdiscplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures, 37, 1159-1178.
16. Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdiscplinary research. Futures, 43, 618-626.
17. Ramadier, T. (2004). Transdiscplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures, 36, 423-439.
18. Roux, D. J., Stirzaker, R. J., Breen, C. M., Lefroy, E. C. & Cresswell, H. P. (2010). Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environmental Science and Policy, 13(8), 733-741. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.002
19. Sargent, L. & Waters, L. (2004). Careers and academic research collaborations: an inductive process Framework for understanding successful collaborations. Journal of Vocational Behaviour,64(2), 308-319. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2002.11.001
20. Sherren, K., Klovdahl, A. S., Robin, L., Butler, L. & Dovers, R. (2009). Collaborative research on sustainability: myths and conundrums of interdisciplinary departments. Journal of Research Practice, 5(1), 1-29. Disponible en http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ838432.pdf
21. Tremblay, G., Zohar, S., Bravo, J., Potsepp, P. & Barker, M. (2010). Canada Foundation for Innovation's outcome measurement study: A pioneering approach to research evaluation. Research Evaluation, 19(5), 333-345. doi: 10.3152/095820210X12809191250960
22. Van Rijnsoever, F. & Hessels, L. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463-472. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
23. Youngblood, D. (2007). Interdisciplinary studies and the bridging disciplines. A matter of process. Journal of Research Practice, 3(2), 1-8. Disponible en http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ800366.pdf