Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 54-60

  Marc Overhage, J ^a,b   Ryan, Patrick B ^b,c,d   Reich, Christian G ^b   Hartzema, Abraham G ^b,e   Stang, Paul E ^b,c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

^d University of North Carolina   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SAFETY SURVEILLANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; MODEL; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING SYSTEMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OBSERVATION; PHARMACOVIGILANCE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84856771418     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000376     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1878-86.
2. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1887-92.
3. Moses LE. Measuring effects without randomized trials? Options, problems, challenges. Med Care 1995;33(4 suppl):AS8-14.
4. Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998;317:1185-90.
5. Stang PE, Ryan PB, Racoosin JA, et al. Advancing the science for active surveillance: rationale and design for the observational medical outcomes partnership. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:600-6.
6. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [Internet]. Common Data Model, ETL Process, & Terminologies; c2009-2011. 2009. http://omop.fnih.org/ETLProcess (accessed 25 Jul 2011).
7. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [Internet]. OMOP Standardized Terminologies; c2009-2011. http://omop.fnih.org/vocabularies (accessed 25 Jul 2011).
8. Brown J, Lane K, Moore K, et al. Database Models to Implement the FDA Sentinel Initiative. Final Report [Internet]. 2009. FDA-2009-N-0192-005. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2009-N-0192-0005 (accessed 5 Mar 2010).
9. Ryan PB, Mera R, Merrill GH. Opportunities and Challenges in Leveraging Observational Data for Pharmacovigilance. Washington, DC: AMIA Pharmacovigilance and Informatics Summit, 2007.
10. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center, AHRQ Publication No 07-EHC001-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007.
11. Health Level Seven International [Internet]. HL7 Reference Information Model; c2007-2011. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/rim.cfm (accessed 18 Nov 2010).
12. i2b2: Informatics for Integrating Biology & the Bedside [Internet]. https://www.i2b2.org (accessed 18 Nov 2010).
13. HMO Research Network [Internet]. c2011. http://www.hmoresearchnetwork.org (accessed 18 Nov 2010).
14. Reisinger SJ, Ryan PB, O'Hara DJ, et al. Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:652-62.
15. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [Internet]. OSCARdObservational Source Characteristics Analysis Report (OSCAR) Design Specification and Feasibility Assessment; c2009-2011. http://omop.fnih.org/OSCAR (accessed 3 Dec 2010).
16. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [Internet]. Generalized Review of OSCAR Unified Checking; c2009-2011. http://omop.fnih.org/GROUCH (accessed 11 Jan 2011).
17. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [Internet]. OMOP Cup; c2009-2011. http://omop.fnih.org/omopcup (accessed 11 Jan 2011).
18. Dinu V, Nadkarni P. Guidelines for the effective use of entity-attribute-value modeling for biomedical databases. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:769-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.023.