Optimal controller structure reduction for decentralized control

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 43, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 303-308

  Schuler, Simone ^a   Münz, Ulrich ^a   Allgöwer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLERS; CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; STATE FEEDBACK; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

CENTRALIZED CONTROLLERS; CONTROLLER DESIGNS; DECENTRALIZED CONTROLLER; LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME SYSTEMS; MEASUREMENT LINKS; NONCONVEX OPTIMIZATION; NUMERICALLY TRACTABLE; OPTIMAL CONTROLLER STRUCTURES;

DECENTRALIZED CONTROL;

EID: 84856759466     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20100915-3-IT-2017.00017     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bristol, E.H. (1966). On a new measure of interactions for multivariable process control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 11(1), 133-134.
2. Candes, E.J., Romberg, J.K., and Tao, T. (2006). Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 52(2), 489-509.
3. 1 minimization. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 14(5), 877-905.
4. Donoho, D.L. (2006). Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 52(4), 1289-1306.
5. El Ghaoui, L., Oustry, F., and AitRami, M. (1997). A cone complementarity linearization algorithm for static output-feedback and related problems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 42(8), 1171-1176.
6. Fazel, M. (2002). Matrix Rank Minimization with Applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Standford University.
7. 8 control. Int. J. Robust and Nonlinear Control, 4, 421-448.
8. 8 error performance: Continuous- and discrete-time cases. Int. Journal of Control, 79, 604-616.
9. 8 output feedback controllers. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 39(6), 1711-1735.
10. Löfberg, J. (2004). YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in Matlab. In Proc. CACSD Conf., 284- 289. Taipei, Taiwan.
11. Mangasarian, O.L. and Pang, J.S. (1995). The extended linear complementarity problem. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 16(2), 359-368.
12. Qi, X., Salapaka, M.V., Voulgaris, P.G., and Khammash, M. (2004). Structured optimal and robust control with multiple criteria: A convex solution. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 49(10), 1623-1640.
13. Rotkowitz, M. and Lall, S. (2006a). Affine controller parameterization for decentralized control over Banach spaces. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 51(9), 1497- 1500.
14. Rotkowitz, M. and Lall, S. (2006b). A characterization of convex problems in decentralized control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 51(2), 1984-1996.
15. Scherer, C.W. (2002). Structured finite-dimensional controller design by convex optimization. Linear Alg. Appl., 351-352, 639-645.
16. Schuler, S., Zhou, W., Münz, U., and Allg̈ower, F. (2010). Controller structure design for decentralized control of higher order subsystems. Submitted.
17. Shah, P. and Parrilo, P.A. (2008). A partial order approach to decentralized control. In Proc. 47th Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), 4351 - 4356.
18. Sturm, J.F. (1999). Using SeDuMi. Optimization Methods and Software, 11-12(1-4), 625-653.
19. 8 controller design for civil structures: A homotopy method through linear matrix inequalities. In Proc. American Control Conference (ACC), 4549-4556.