Projections from Gudden's tegmental nuclei to the mammillary body region in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis)

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 520, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1128-1145

  Saunders, Richard C ^a   Vann, Seralynne D ^b   Aggleton, John P ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amnesia; Head direction; Hypothalamus; Memory; Primate; Raphe nucleus; Tegmentum

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE; CALBINDIN; CALRETININ; HORSERADISH PEROXIDASE; PARVALBUMIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CELL LABELING; DORSAL TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS; GUDDEN TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS; HAPLORHINI; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MACACA MULATTA; MAMMILLARY BODY; MEDIAL LONGITUDINAL FASCICULUS; MESENCEPHALON; NERVE PROJECTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEGMENTUM; VENTRAL TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS;

ANIMALS; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MAMILLARY BODIES; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PONS; TEGMENTUM MESENCEPHALI;

EID: 84856759248     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: 10969861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22740     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aggleton JP. 1985. X-ray localization of limbic structures in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). J Neurosci Methods 14: 101-108.
2. Aggleton JP, Passingham RE. 1981. Stereotaxic surgery under X-ray guidance in the rhesus monkey, with special reference to the amygdala. Exp Brain Res 44: 271-276.
3. Aggleton JP, Vann SD, Saunders RC. 2005. Projections from the hippocampal region to the mammillary bodies in macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 22: 2519-2530.
4. Allen GV, Hopkins DA. 1989. Mamillary body in the rat: topography and synaptology of projections from the subicular complex, prefrontal cortex, and midbrain tegmentum. J Comp Neurol 286: 311-336.
5. Amaral DG, Price JL, Pitkanen A, Carmichael ST. 1992. Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In: Aggleton JP, editor. The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction. New York: Wiley Periodicals. p 1-66.
6. Bassant MH, Poindessous-Jazat F. 2001. Ventral tegmental nucleus of Gudden: a pontine hippocampal theta generator? Hippocampus 11: 809-813.
7. Bassett JP, Taube JS. 2001. Neural correlates for angular head velocity in the rat dorsal tegmental nucleus. J Neurosci 21: 5740-5751.
8. Bassett JP, Tullman ML, Taube JS. 2007. Lesions of the tegmentomammillary circuit in the head direction system disrupt the head direction signal in the anterior thalamus. J Neurosci 27: 7564-7577.
9. Blair HT, Cho J, Sharp PE. 1998. Role of the lateral mammillary nucleus in the rat head-direction circuit: a combined single unit recording and lesion study. Neuron 21: 1387-1397.
10. Briggs TL, Kaelber W. 1971. Efferent fiber connections of the dorsal and deep tegmental nuclei of Gudden. An experimental study in the cat. Brain Res 29: 17-29.
11. Celio MR. 1986. Parvalbumin in most γ-aminobutyric acid containing neurons of the rat cerebral cortex. Science 231: 995-997.
12. Conde F, Lund JS, Jacobowitz DM, Baimbridge KG, Lewis DA. 1994. Local circuit neurons immunoreactive for calretinin, calbindin-28k or parvalbumin in monkey prefrontal cortex: distribution and morphology. J Comp Neurol 341: 95-116.
13. Crosby EC, Woodburne RT. 1943. The nuclear pattern of the non-tectal portions of the midbrain and isthmus in primates. J Comp Neurol 78: 441-482.
14. Crosby EC, Woodburne RT. 1951. The mammalian midbrain and isthmus regions. Part II. The fiber connections. J Comp Neurol 94: 1-32
15. Dusoir H, Kapur N, Brynes DP, McKinstry S Hoare RD. 1990. The role of diencephalic pathology in human memory disorder. Brain 113: 1695-1706.
16. Gallyas F. 1979. Silver staining of myelin by means of physical development. Neurol Res 1: 203-209.
17. Goldberg E, Antin SP, Bilder RM Jr, Gerstman LJ, Hughes JE, Mattis S. 1981. Retrograde amnesia: possible role of mesencephalic reticular activation in long-term memory. Science 213: 1392-1394.
18. Gonzalo-Ruiz A, Romera JC, Sanz JM, Morte L. 1999. Localization of amino acids, neuropeptides and cholinergic neurotransmitter markers in identified projections from the mesencephalic tegmentum to the mammillary nuclei of the rat. J Chem Neuroanat 16: 117-133.
19. Gudden B. von 1884. Uber das Corpus mammillare und die sogenannten Schenkel des Fornix. 57.Vers. dtsch. Natforsch., Magdeburg, Tagungsblatt.
20. Hanker JS, Yates PE, Metz CB, Rustioni A. 1977. A new specific, sensitive and non-carcinogenic reagent for the demonstration of horeseradish-peroxidase. J Histochem 9: 789-792.
21. Hayakawa T, Ito H, Zyo K. 1993. Neuroanatomical study of the afferent projections to the supramammillary nucleus in the rat. Anat Embryol 188: 139-148.
22. Hayakawa T, Zyo K. 1983. Comparative cyoarchitectonic study of Gudden's tegmental nuclei in some mammals. J Comp Neurol 216: 233-244.
23. Hayakawa T, Zyo K. 1984. Comparative anatomical study of the tegmentomammillary projections in some mammals: a horseradish peroxidise study. Brain Res 300: 335-349.
24. Hopkins DA. 2005. Neuroanatomy of head direction cell circuits. In: Wiener SI, Taube JS, editors. Head direction cells and the neural mechanisms of spatial orientation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p 17-44.
25. Huang X-F, Tork I, Halliday GM, Paxinos G. 1992. The dorsal, posterodorsal, and ventral tegmental nuclei: a cyto- and chemoarchitectonic study in the human. J Comp Neurol 318: 117-137.
26. Kapur N, Crewes H, Wise R, Abbott P, Carter M, Millar J, Lang D. 1998. Mammillary body damage results in memory impairment but not amnesia. Neurocase 4: 509-517.
27. Kocsis B, Vertes RP. 1994. Characterization of neurons of the supramammillary nucleus and mammillary body that discharge rhythmically with hippocampal theta in the rat. J Neurosci 14: 7040-7052.
28. Lavenex P, Lavenex PB, Bennett JL, Amaral DG. 2009. Postmortem changes in the neuroanatomical characteristics of the primate brain: hippocampal formation. J Comp Neurol 512: 27-51.
29. Leichnetz GR, Carleton SM, Katayama Y, Gonzalo-Ruiz A, Holstege G, DeSalles AAF, Hayes RL. 1989. Afferent and efferent connections of the cholinoceptive medial pontine reticular formation (region of the ventral tegmental nucleus) in the cat. Brain Res Bull 22: 665-688.
30. Loftus M, Knight RT, Amaral DG. 2000. An analysis of atrophy in the medial mammillary nucleus following hippocampal and fornix lesions in humans and nonhuman primates. Exp Neurol 163: 180-190.
31. Meibach RC, Siegel A. 1975. The origin of the fornix fibers which project to the mammillary bodies in the rat: a horseradish peroxidase study. Brain Res 88: 508-512.
32. Mesulam M-M. 1982. Tracing neural connections with horseradish peroxidase. New York: Wiley.
33. Paxinos G, Huang X-F, Petrides M, Toga A.W. 2000. The rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Perry VH, Linden R. 1982. Evidence for dendritic competition in the developing retina. Nature 297: 683-685.
35. Petrovicky P. 1971. Structure and incidence of Gudden's tegmental nuclei in some mammals. Acta Anat (Basel) 80: 272-286.
36. Petrovicky P. 1973. Note on the connections of Gudden's tegmental nuclei. I. Efferent ascending connections in the mammillary peduncle. Acta Anat 86: 165-190.
37. Poletti CE, Cresswell G. 1977. Fornix system efferent projections in the squirrel monkey: an experimental degeneration study. J Comp Neurol 175: 101-128.
38. Rose J. 1939. The cell structure of the mamillary body in the mammals and in man. J Anat 74: 91-115.
39. Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. 1977. Hippocampal efferents reach widespread areas of cerebral cortex and amygdala in the rhesus monkey. Science 198: 315-317.
40. Rosene DL, Roy NJ, Davis BJ. 1986. A cryoprotection method that facilitates cutting frozen sections of whole monkey brains for histological and histochemical processing without freezing artifact. J Histochem Cytochem 34: 1301-1315.
41. Saleem KS, Logothetis NK. 2007. A combined MRI and histology atlas of the rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates. London: Academic Press.
42. Saunders RC. 1983. Some experiments on memory involving the fornix-mammillary system. PhD thesis, Oxford University.
43. Shantha TR, Manocha SL, Bourne GH. 1968. A stereotaxic atlas of the Java monkey brain (Macaca irus). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
44. Snider RS, Lee JC. 1961. A stereotaxic atlas of the monkey brain (Macaca mulatta). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Sternberger A, Sternberger NH. 1983 Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80: 6126-6130.
46. Swanson LW, Cowan WM. 1977. An autoradiographic study of the organization of the efferent connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat. J Comp Neurol 172: 49-84.
47. Tago H, Kimura H, Maeda T. 1986. Visualization of detailed acetycholinesterase fiber and neuron staining in the rate brain by a sensitive histochemical procedure. J Histochem Cytochem 34: 1431-1438.
48. Tsivilis D, Vann SD, Denby C, Roberts N, Mayes AR, Montaldi D, Aggleton JP. 2008. A disproportionate role for the fornix and mammillary bodies in recall versus recognition memory. Nat Neurosci 11: 834-842.
49. Valenstein ES, Nauta WJH. 1959. A comparison of the distribution of the fornix system in the rat, guinea pig, cat, and monkey. J Comp Neurol 113: 337-362.
50. Van der Werf Y, Witter MP, Uylings HBM, Jolles J. 2000. Neuropsychology of infarctions in the thalamus: a review. Neuropsychologia 38: 613-627.
51. Vann SD, Saunders RC, Aggleton JP. 2007. Distinct, parallel pathways link the medial mammillary bodies to the anterior thalamus in macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 26: 1575-1586.
52. Vann SD. 2009. Gudden's ventral tegmental nucleus is vital for memory: re-evaluating diencephalic inputs for amnesia. Brain 132: 2372-2384.
53. Vann SD. 2010. Re-evaluating the role of the mammillary bodies in memory. Neuropsychologia 48: 2316-2327.
54. Vann SD, Aggleton JP. 2004. The mammillary bodies-two memory systems in one? Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 35-44.
55. Vann SD, Saunders RC, Aggleton JP. 2007. Distinct, parallel pathways link the medial mammillary bodies to the anterior thalamus in macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 26: 1575-1586.
56. Vann SD, Tsivilis D, Denby CE, Quamme J, Yonelinas AP, Aggleton JP, Montaldi M, Mayes AR. 2009. Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage: convergence across three methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 5442-5447.
57. Veazey RB, Amaral DG, Cowan WM. 1982. The morphology and connections of the posterior hypothalamus in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). II Efferent connections. J Comp Neurol 207: 135-156.
58. Vertes RP, Hoover WB, Viana Di Prisco G. 2004. Theta rhythm of the hippocampus: subcortical control and functional significance. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3: 173-200.
59. Victor M, Adams RD, Collins GH. 1971. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Philadelphia: Davis.
60. Wirtshafter D, Stratford TR. 1993. Evidence for GABAergic projections from the tegmental nuclei of Gudden to the mammillary body in the rat. Brain Res 630: 188-194.