'Microperc' micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Evidence to practice

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 134-138

  Desai, Mahesh ^a   Mishra, Shashikant ^a  

^a MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

All seeing needle; microperc; percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MICRO PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; NEEDLE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROSCOPY; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MINIATURIZATION; NEEDLES; NEPHROLITHIASIS; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856755788     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834fc3bb     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Morgenstern L. George Berci: past, present, and future. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (Suppl 2):S410-S411.
2. Bader M, Gratzke C, Schlenker B, et al. The 'all-seeing needle': an optical puncture system confirming percutaneous access in PCNL J Urol 2010; 183 (Suppl):A1890.
3. Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, et al. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithot-omy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 2011; 186:140-145.
4. Srivastava A, Zaman W, Singh V, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary lower calyceal stone: a statistical model. BJU Int 2004; 93:364-368. (Pubitemid 38253586)
5. Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y, et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearanceafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsy. J Urol 2002; 168(4Pt1): 1344-1347. (Pubitemid 35034118)
6. Riedler I, Trummer H, Hebel P, Hubmer G. Outcome and safety of extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first-line therapy of lower pole nephro-lithiasis. Urol Int 2003; 71:350-354. (Pubitemid 37500525)
7. Poulakis V, Dahm P, Witzsch U, et al. Prediction oflower polestoneclearance after shockwave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network. J Urol 2003; 169:1250-1256. (Pubitemid 36323761)
8. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 2001; 166:2072-2080; (Pubitemid 33065219)
9. Erratum in J Urol 2002; 167:1805..
10. Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retro-grade intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009: CD007044.
11. Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D'A Honey RJ, Pace KT. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent? J Endourol 2011; 25:481-485.
12. Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20mm. J Endourol 2011;25:1131-1135.
13. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 2008; 179 (Suppl 5):S69-S73. (Pubitemid 351492527)
14. Van Hove A, Falco C, Vallier C, et al. Economic evaluation of deflexible ureteroscopy with laser. Prog Urol 2008; 18:1050-1055.
15. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 2006; 176:137-141. (Pubitemid 43833177)
16. Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multiinstitutional clinical trial. Urology 2010; 75:534-538.
17. Zilberman DE, Mor Y, Duvdevani M, et al. Retrograde intra-renal surgery for stone extraction. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2007; 41:204-207. (Pubitemid 46676359)
18. Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, et al., Clinical research officeof the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Study Group. Oper-ating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5537 patients in the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol 2011; 25:933-939.
19. Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, et al. CROES PCNL Study Group J. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 2011. [Epub ahead of print]
20. Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, et al. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol 2010; 24:1075-1079.
21. Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, et al. Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 2010; 24:1579-1582.
22. Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, et al. Prospective comparativestudyofminiperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x. [Epubahead ofprint]
23. Frattini A, Barbieri A, Salsi P, et al. One shot: a novel method to dilate the nephrostomy access for percutaneous lithotripsy. J Endourol 2001; 15: 919-923. (Pubitemid 33136247)
24. Falahatkar S, Neiroomand H, Akbarpour M, et al. One-shot versus met al telescopic dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithot-omy: comparison of safety and efficacy. Endourol 2009; 23:615-618.
25. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Tinmouth WW, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticular calculi: a novel single stage approach. J Urol 2005; 173:1194-1198. (Pubitemid 40380533)
26. String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, et al. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:570-573. (Pubitemid 32500122)
27. Lombezzi R, Galleano R, Lucarini L, Falchero F. New technique for optical control of the first trocar insertion. Minerva Chir 2002; 57:527-529. (Pubitemid 34875581)
28. Gazelle GS, Haaga JR, Rowland DY. Effect of needle gauge, level of antic-oagulation, and target organ on bleeding associated with aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1992; 183:509-513.
29. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, et al. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible uretero-scopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 2004; 18:33-36. (Pubitemid 38295660)