Complex versus simple ankle movement training in stroke using telerehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial

Physical Therapy

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 197-209

  Deng, Huiqiong ^a   Durfee, William K ^a   Nuckley, David J ^a   Rheude, Brandon S ^b   Severson, Amy E ^c   Skluzacek, Katie M ^d   Spindler, Kristen K ^e   Davey, Cynthia S ^a   Carey, James R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b United Hospital   (United States)

^c Aegis Therapies   (United States)

^d NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e St Lucas Care Center/Back in Action Rehab   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ANKLE JOINT; BRAIN MAPPING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84856734262     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20110018     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Dobrez D, Heinemann AW, Deutsch A, et al. Impact of Medicare's prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke patient outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 89:198-204.
2. Granger CV, Markello SJ, Graham JE, et al. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with stroke discharged from comprehensive medical programs in 2000-2007. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:961-972.
3. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, et al. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41: 1016-1102.
4. Carey JR, Durfee WK, Bhatt E, et al. Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:216-232.
5. Holden MK, Dyar TA, Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15:36-42.
6. Huber M, Rabin B, Docan C, et al. Feasibility of modified remotely monitored inhome gaming technology for improving hand function in adolescents with cerebral palsy. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010;14:526-534.
7. Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, et al. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Informatics Internet Med. 2004;29: 119-125.
8. Piron L, Turolla A, Tonin P, et al. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14: 257-260.
9. Deutsch JE, Lewis JA, Burdea G. Technical and patient performance using a virtual reality-integrated telerehabilitation system: preliminary finding. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15:30-35.
10. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:169-174.
11. Mirelman A, Patritti BL, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2010;31:433-437.
12. Kesar TM, Perumal R, Jancosko A, et al. Novel patterns of functional electrical stimulation have an immediate effect on dorsiflexor muscle function during gait for people poststroke. Phys Ther. 2010;90: 55-66.
13. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Sparrow WA. Effect of stroke on step characteristics of obstacle crossing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1712-1719.
14. Waters RL, Mulroy S. The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait Posture. 1999;9:207-231.
15. Kleim JA, Barbay S, Cooper NR, et al. Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;77:63-77.
16. Nudo R, Milliken G, Jenkins W, Merzenich M. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:785-807.
17. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;74:27-55.
18. Pascual-Leone A, Nguyen KT, Cohen AD, et al. Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74: 1037-1045.
19. Doyon J, Korman M, Morin A, et al. Contribution of night and day sleep vs simple passage of time to the consolidation of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning. Exp Brain Res. 2009;195: 15-26.
20. Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92:66-72.
21. Georgopoulos AP, Lurito JT, Petrides M, et al. Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science. 1989;243:234-236.
22. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Inc; 2005.
23. Carey JR. Manual stretch: Effect on finger movement control and force control in stroke subjects with spastic extrinsic finger flexor muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:888-894.
24. Anderson DI, Magill RA, Sekiya H. Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. J Motor Behav. 2001;33:59.
25. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:383-392.
26. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al; for the International Society of Biomechanics. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion, part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech. 2002;35: 543-548.
27. Begg R, Best R, Dell'Oro L, Taylor S. Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. Gait Posture. 2007;25:191-198.
28. Mills PM, Barrett RS, Morrison S. Toe clearance variability during walking in young and elderly men. Gait Posture. 2008;28: 101-107.
29. Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A. Safety of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with titanium skull plates. Clin Neurophys. 2009;120: 1417.
30. Lin PY, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. The relation between ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87: 562-568.
31. Oken O, Yavuzer G, Ergocen S, et al. Repeatability and variation of quantitative gait data in subgroups of patients with stroke. Gait Posture. 2008;27:506-511.
32. Patterson KK, Gage WH, Brooks D, et al. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture. 2010;31:241-246.
33. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988.
34. Dassonville P, Lewis SM, Zhu XH, et al. The effect of stimulus-response compatibility on cortical motor activation. Neuroimage. 2001;13:1-14.
35. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 2002;15:870-878.
36. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518-2527.
37. LaPointe KE, Klein JA, Konkol ML, et al. Cortical activation during finger tracking vs ankle tracking in healthy subjects. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27:253-264.
38. Rao SM, Bandettini PA, Binder JR, et al. Relationship between finger movement rate and functional magnetic resonance signal change in human primary motor cortex. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16:1250-1254.
39. Sadato N, Ibanez V, Campbell G, et al. Frequency-dependent changes of regional cerebral blood flow during finger movements: functional MRI compared to PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17:670-679.
40. Jenkins IH, Passingham RE, Brooks DJ. The effect of movement frequency on cerebral activation: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurol Sci. 1997;151: 195-205.
41. Waldvogel D, van Gelderen P, Ishii K, Hallett M. The effect of movement amplitude on activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:1209-1212.
42. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke. 2002;33:1610-1617.
43. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126:2476-2496.
44. Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1278-1282.
45. Klintsova AY, Dickson E, Yoshida R, Greenough WT. Altered expression of BDNF and its high-affinity receptor TrkB in response to complex motor learning and moderate exercise. Brain Res. 2004;1028: 92-104.
46. Gomez-Pinilla F, So V, Kesslak JP. Spatial learning and physical activity contribute to the induction of fibroblast growth factor: neural substrates for increased cognition associated with exercise. Neuroscience. 1998;85:53-61.
47. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Inc; 1999.
48. Kimberley TJ, Samargia S, Moore LG, et al. Comparison of amounts and types of practice during rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury and stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:851-862.
49. Coren S. The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: norms for young adults. Bull Psychonomic Soc. 1993;31:1-1.
50. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12: 189-198.